Earl wasn't flipping off the fans or his teammates.
One gesture and some contract unhappiness does not change eight years of amazing play and good leadership.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Earl wasn't flipping off the fans or his teammates. Anyone following this situation knows he's flipping off Pete Carroll. Some of you are like man-pansies taking umbrage like some lady that heard a curse word. Please stop with the offended sensibilities and stop acting you like you haven't been as pissed as Earl about a bad situation. The man broke his leg and lashed out at the guy he blames.
Some of you turn on a guy so quickly. Do everything right for 8 years, but as soon as you do a few minor things people take issue with and they write you off and act offended. I have no real understanding or sympathy because I'm a fan looking to get offended. If you can't give a guy a break that just broke his leg after a frustrating year of dealing with contract issues, then you're just an unsympathetic jerk.
Earl been since 2010. He's been a cornerstone of the team for 8 years. He had a blow up and a rough year dealing with contract issues. A guy does everything for that long for the team you love, you can show some understanding for an angry reaction. One gesture and some contract unhappiness does not change eight years of amazing play and good leadership.
And if I accept your theory that Earl was flipping off Pete, that makes it even worse. Pete arguably made Earl. He drafted him #13 overall, surrounded him with All Pro talent, was with him when they went to two straight SB's and winning one, and gifted him with a defensive philosophy that played to Earl's strengths. So do I hear you right that you think it's all fine and dandy that Earl flipped him off? If that's the case, that Earl was flipping off Pete, then I've lost a lot of respect for Earl unless he offers some type of apology.
RiverDog wrote:A few minor things? Is that how you characterize holding out while you're still under contract?
And if I accept your theory that Earl was flipping off Pete, that makes it even worse. Pete arguably made Earl. He drafted him #13 overall, surrounded him with All Pro talent, was with him when they went to two straight SB's and winning one, and gifted him with a defensive philosophy that played to Earl's strengths. So do I hear you right that you think it's all fine and dandy that Earl filpped him off? If that's the case, that Earl was flipping off Pete, then I've lost a lot of respect for Earl unless he offers some type of apology.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Holding out under contract doesn't a make a guy a piece of garbage or flipping the bird in a state of anger and pain. I don't care how some of you try to characterize Earl. All he did was make an angry gesture and do what he could to get a contract so that he would have some security against something like this. Not sure why you all keep bringing up the amount of money rather than the situation. Any one of you would not enjoy being in his situation as far as playing in the last year of a contract and risking the loss of millions due to exactly what happened. He literally lost millions of dollars getting injured.
I still don't like how eight of years of giving it his all on the field and being a model citizen is all forgotten for one year of being angry with a hard situation. The way some of you tossed out all he had done after one instance of anger is exactly why players cannot worry about fans. They turn at the drop of a dime. One thing some fans don't agree with and suddenly they're tossing out insults, wanting to get rid of them, and talking about them like they're subhuman and did some horrible crime. I guess in this era of outrage, it's par for the course.
I have no desire or reason to participate, This is nothing more to me but a guy venting after losing millions of dollars and possibly his career due to a team playing hardball in business. He played eight years of great ball. He was a very instrumental part of Seattle's first Super Bowl, the best player on a legendary secondary that made it all work. I'm more sad to see his career here end the way it did than angry at Earl. After a broken leg and a frustrating financial year that probably had him stressed out, I can sympathize with his reaction and not take it personally.
Earl seems like a good guy to me. No off the field troubles. He takes care of his family. I never once saw less than 100% from him on the field. It's more than most humans do, even most taking shots at him right now while he's down.
HumanCockroach wrote:Not for nothing, but I was just reminded that Thomas left millions on the table when he signed his last contract... between 2 and 5 million a year, to help Seattle retain their talent.
Not an argument, just something pertinent imho... I had completely forgotten about it.
HumanCockroach wrote:What you or I "believe" is irrelevant.
HumanCockroach wrote:Lmao... it is if you can leave the Seahawks and get more money, which is exactly what happened. When you are setting the bar, there isn't a "limit", you get what the market pays, insisting that because he was the highest paid FS for a month or a year so he couldn't have been paid more somewhere else, so he didn't give a hometown discount, is ridiculous, but more than that, it's false.
HumanCockroach wrote:Lmao...
Sure, whatever makes you feel better about your hate.
obiken wrote:ID I feel your feelings and I agree with a lot of them. However, the Hawks have own a lot this as well. They caved on the Kam Chancellor situation and it bit them in the AZZ, Now He expected the same treatment, not a bad expectation. 2 things however, 1 with all the rule changes in the NFL, the dynamic has changed. Offense rules, defense drools. 2. No way that they were going back to the original policy after Cam got hurt. The players who want guaranteed contract, better be prepared to strike or be a QB, or NOT play defense. What Earl forgot is how lucky they all are to be making millions instead of scratching the earth for a living like the rest of us chickens. Those who pay 200 bucks minimal for seats at QF, (I am guessing never been there) are for the most part, in the latter category. When I lived in Seattle in 76-84, tickets were 20 bucks. My wage was 5 bucks an hour. The tickets were 4X the cost of my wage. Now unless you make 50 bucks an hour, its more like 8X the cost of a good wage. Earl is done, I wish him well, but too bad!
Retired Chicken!
obiken wrote:ID I feel your feelings and I agree with a lot of them. However, the Hawks have own a lot this as well. They caved on the Kam Chancellor situation and it bit them in the AZZ, Now He expected the same treatment, not a bad expectation. 2 things however, 1 with all the rule changes in the NFL, the dynamic has changed. Offense rules, defense drools. 2. No way that they were going back to the original policy after Cam got hurt. The players who want guaranteed contract, better be prepared to strike or be a QB, or NOT play defense. What Earl forgot is how lucky they all are to be making millions instead of scratching the earth for a living like the rest of us chickens. Those who pay 200 bucks minimal for seats at QF, (I am guessing never been there) are for the most part, in the latter category. When I lived in Seattle in 76-84, tickets were 20 bucks. My wage was 5 bucks an hour. The tickets were 4X the cost of my wage. Now unless you make 50 bucks an hour, its more like 8X the cost of a good wage. Earl is done, I wish him well, but too bad!
Retired Chicken!
RiverDog wrote:
Regarding the exponential increase in ticket prices, a friend and I bought two Seahawk season tickets in 1984 for $15/seat for 10 games. They were pretty bad seats, at the very top of the 300 level and off the corner of the end zone, but not behind the goal posts. Each year, we gradually moved up in seating priority, and when we finally cried uncle and gave them up in 1996, our seats were on the 100 level, 35 yard line, and about 25 rows up from the stadium floor. Those seats would be considered club seats in today's NFL, and cost around $500/game.
Your $200 for minimal seats are about right, at least tickets bought off the secondary markets, which didn't exist when my buddy and I gave up our season tickets. It used to be that similar to baseball, you could take a family of 4 to a game and not spend more than $100 for tickets. Nowadays, it's cost prohibitive for a working stiff to take his family to an NFL game.
I share Obi's sentiments about multi million dollar players holding out for more money. It simply does not resonate with Joe Six Pack, which is one of the reasons why I contend that the modern day professional athlete is out of touch with their fans.
RiverDog wrote:You're exagurating again. No one called Earl a piece of garbage. For my part, I have said that I understand that it was perhaps an emotional, hot blooded response and that he's just venting his frustration at being injured. I'm just differing from you and several others that are making excuses for him and think that it's acceptable behavior to make obscene gestures on national TV.
Aseahawkfan wrote:burtonnn called him a piece of garbage. Did he change his earlier post?
HumanCockroach wrote:I'd agree with that argument about it not belonging on TV, but find the fire to get offended when multiple beloved Seattle stars and coaches have done the same, without a peep from various offended people... there's a hypocracy there I can't get on board with.... what Thomas did certainly wasn't classy, but surely it's no less classy than Baldwin pooping out a football in the SB, lynch grabbing his junk, or both of them flipping off people during various games ( not to mention the head coaches itchy nose middle finger gestures towards officials) if those instances are an "eh, whatever" without the amount lost, injury etc as Thomas' ..then I lack the ability to be upset.
I don't hate a businessman for doing what Joe Sixpack would and has done ( ie get what he can, while he can) nor do I lose it when a team does what they have to, but the ire directed at a person doing so, is quite frankly shocking, and disappointing. Villafying someone because they make more, and are attempting to do what every single working person does, simply out of jealousy of the amount they already make ( while ignoring moves by billionaires) seems to be "less in touch with Joe sixpack " than the players...
I've often wondered if it's more of a "how dare you not get used by your employer, or at the very least, suck it up, and forgo your opportunities" resentment instead of some sort of induced upon moral question...
burrrton wrote:*sigh*
It's an old proverb, but I'll admit to a bit of overreaction. Only a bit (I still say good riddance to his ass if he wants to say "F you" to my team), but I could have chosen my words more advisedly.
Better?
You mean like a person feeling angry for what they perceive as a wrong directed towards them?
All it took was one finger to set you and Idhawkman off, yet Earl had a lot more reason to be angry.
Aseahawkfan wrote:You mean like a person feeling angry for what they perceive as a wrong directed towards them? Imagine that. Someone making an offensive comment or gesture in a moment anger must be fairly common, eh, especially after someone broken their leg and having their entire career in question as well as losing millions of dollars of market value. All it took was one finger to set you and Idhawkman off, yet Earl had a lot more reason to be angry.
People can complain about holdouts and such all they like. If they lost millions of dollars on a twist of fate, they'd be just as unhappy and pissed off even if they did manage to control expressing their anger in the heat of the moment. Joe Six-Pack don't like to lose money any more than millionaire athlete. No matter how it is framed, Earl lost millions from that injury.
burrrton wrote:Early was flipping off the organization, not Pete. Oops.
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/2491 ... individual
RiverDog wrote:Thanks for the lesson, Earl. The next time I get mad at the owner for their outrageous beer prices, I'll flip off the bartender. I'll let you know how it goes.
RiverDog wrote:Thanks for the lesson, Earl. The next time I get mad at the owner for their outrageous beer prices, I'll flip off the bartender. I'll let you know how it goes.
burrrton wrote:And to take the analogy further, the owner had to raise beer prices because alcohol taxes went up.
Sox-n-hawks wrote:Who cares who he was flipping off? What a classless way to go out. He could have bowed out graciously and taken a contract with another team. His attitude in this situation may impact any future contracts with other teams.
Sox-n-hawks wrote:Bob...
Then why is Kaep jobless?
Sox-n-hawks wrote:Fake news
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests