HumanCockroach wrote:And yet after Sowell went out, less pressures, no sacks and triple the amount of production by the offense...
Your claim was the worst line in 40 years... Now you want to claim worst tackles? OK.
You want to vent, go right ahead, I really am not offended by it. The proof is in the pudding do to speak, Seattle has allowed less pressures, and less sacks than recent lines. Just the way it is... Have you forgotten so much history? How about 10 sacks against KC ( wonder what the reaction was after that game? Probably not much as they won)or the Seahawks record number of sacks in 92'?
This line played poorly tonight, no doubt about it, exaggeration to claim them the "worst" Hawks line in history.
NorthHawk wrote:So what happens now if we don't make any additions?
I suspect Gilliam would move to LT where he was expected to play this year and Webb would be in the picture as well, either at G or T with Ifedi moving to RT if Webb moves to G.
That would give us a huge right side of the line that should be able to move opposing DLs for the run game, not to mention some big obstacles on the right to at least have the DE go around them on passing downs.
I think what this last game showed us was what Lynch brought to the team. One big run where he broke tackles and pushed the pile could have ignited the Offense to greater things. That can't be replaced, so the OL has to make up for the difference.
I think what this last game showed us was what Lynch brought to the team. One big run where he broke tackles and pushed the pile could have ignited the Offense to greater things. That can't be replaced, so the OL has to make up for the difference
While I miss Beast Mode as much or more than anyone, the number one reason we are running the ball less effectively this year is Wilson's injuries. Pete did not even try to qualify that last night.... whereas in past weeks he and RW would both go on and on about how fine he was, Pete said the numbers are the numbers and "it's (RW's limited ability due to being injured on both legs) a factor." It is not only a factor, it is THE factor. When #24 went down last year, Rawls and later Michael did quite fine pounding the rock. Go back to Marshawn's numbers before and after RW came to town and compare. It is the threat of RW's legs that helps our run game into the upper echelon - and without it, we are predictable and one-dimensional...or less-dimensional anyway. This is not to undersell what Beast Mode meant to this team. He was important, he was a once in a generation type back who I think deserves a gold jacket. And yes, we miss him. What's killing us is that RW is hurt AND the O-line is crappy. If only one of those were true, we could move the ball better than we do.
NorthHawk wrote:So what happens now if we don't make any additions?
I suspect Gilliam would move to LT where he was expected to play this year and Webb would be in the picture as well, either at G or T with Ifedi moving to RT if Webb moves to G.
That would give us a huge right side of the line that should be able to move opposing DLs for the run game, not to mention some big obstacles on the right to at least have the DE go around them on passing downs.
I think what this last game showed us was what Lynch brought to the team. One big run where he broke tackles and pushed the pile could have ignited the Offense to greater things. That can't be replaced, so the OL has to make up for the difference.
I just don't see how we're going to compete with teams featuring strong pass rushes like Philly, Minnie, the Lambs, and Arizona if we don't get some immediate help at tackle. I have to believe that even though the HC's for Thomas and Staley, the two most often mentioned possibilities, have come out and said publically that they're not on the trading block, that Schneider is working behind the scenes to cut a deal. I don't see us getting back to the SB with our current tackles, a problem made even worse now that Sowell is going to be out a couple of games.
NorthHawk wrote:Are you suggesting they have been looking for replacements all year? I somehow doubt it as the most players available were at the start of the year before the injuries hit across the league. If they thought it was a problem early, they would have made a move then.
I think they are going to try to ride this out for a few games until Sowell returns. But I could be wrong as trade deadlines often create more focus and bigger gambles.
The problem is the money and age of the better OL that MIGHT be available.
Hawkstar wrote:Saw a mention on ESPN that Russ was limited in practice today because of a new injury - Pectoral. The guy isn't going to last with his mobility limited.
obiken wrote:Sadly I agree, and I predicted it, to the hatred of Human. WISH I WAS WRONG!! our OL just sucks.
c_hawkbob wrote:Russ is clearly physically hampered with injuries to each leg and his throwing shoulder. A very big part of the reason he is clearly hampred is the offensive line, whether it be the hits he takes due to ineffective blocking - which BTW I do agree is clearly better this year than last (boy is that a low bar) or his feeling like he has to "carry" the offensive load now in the absence of Marshawn. To "blame Wilson" is also an indictment of the O-line and by extension John and Pete. As it should be; this is a team game, our team's shortcomings are a team issue.
The sky really isn't falling though, we're still solidly in first place in our division, we're getting healthy and whether you want to acknowledge it or not the O-line really does look like they could be a decent group as the season goes on.
As for the article linked above, I hope they are correct that the current makeup of our cap distribution pie is more a function of which stars came due for their contracts first and not a team philosophy of skimping on the O-line. Looking back on how it all shook out I can accept that for now. We'll see going forward.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests