Irish Greg 2.0 wrote:Have fun, Whiners!
The good news for SF is they get to play the Packers defense, and without Clay Matthews. They will be able to score.
Mo the Toe wrote:I've just can't decide if it's an advantage for either team. All I can come up with is it's a disadvantage to both teams. It will be tough to throw or kick so I guess the team that runs the ball and is most physical will win. Important to keep the hands, feet and balls warm.
Mo the Toe wrote:I've just can't decide if it's an advantage for either team. All I can come up with is it's a disadvantage to both teams. It will be tough to throw or kick so I guess the team that runs the ball and is most physical will win. Important to keep the hands, feet and balls warm.
Steady_Hawk wrote:Would it be something like this HC?
http://www.thegoofygiftshop.com/weenie_warmers.php
Irish Greg 2.0 wrote:Carlos Rogers? He hasn't been ruled out yet.
Niners have owned the Packers the last 3 times they have played. Discount Daaaaable check needs to put up or shut up.
Steady_Hawk wrote:Eagle,
Seriously, my hatred for the Niners didn't come into full bloom until I went to the Webzone and spent hours there reading. Their fans are the most arrogant pompous jackasses I have ever seen. I now go to the NFL.com site and post in the comment section just to get under their skin.
Just today, and I'm dead serious, I was having a discussion with a monster hardcore Niner fan and after we went rounds he told me to practice safe sex and go F myself. LOL! Of course all of my retorts were "G" rated just to make it worse for him.
I have very high expectations for Wilson, and that's six Lombardi's. Just one more so we can stop hearing those jackknobs keep bellowing about their history channel victories.
Rams fans were NEVER this bad.
Zorn76 wrote:SF 24
GB 20
Steady_Hawk wrote:Eagle,
Seriously, my hatred for the Niners didn't come into full bloom until I went to the Webzone and spent hours there reading. Their fans are the most arrogant pompous jackasses I have ever seen. I now go to the NFL.com site and post in the comment section just to get under their skin.
Just today, and I'm dead serious, I was having a discussion with a monster hardcore Niner fan and after we went rounds he told me to practice safe sex and go F myself. LOL! Of course all of my retorts were "G" rated just to make it worse for him.
I have very high expectations for Wilson, and that's six Lombardi's. Just one more so we can stop hearing those jackknobs keep bellowing about their history channel victories.
Rams fans were NEVER this bad.
Distant Relative wrote:Screw the football, I just hope the can keep the cameras on. Can you imagine being a cameraman in this game?
monkey wrote:Of all the games this post season, IMO this game is the one absolute stone cold lock, the one game that if I was forced to bet my life on, I'd be most confident I would survive.
In spite of how much I hate the Niners, and in spite of how much I would LOVE to see them lose in Green Bay, the Packers defense isn't just bad, it's HORRIBLE!!!
There's virtually ZERO chance of the Packers stopping the Niners run game. No way is that wretched defense going to stop Gore, in the cold no less.
I expect a Niners blowout actually, in spite of everyone and their dog picking this to be the hard fought close game, I think everyone and their dog is wrong, this one will be the blowout, the Packers are about to get creamed.
Disclaimer: this is just a prediction, but one I feel strongly about, I hope like CRAZY that I am completely wrong though!!! I'd love nothing more than to see the Niners get smashed in the face, and exit the playoffs in embarrassing fashion.
savvyman wrote:Monkey good to see you posting here.
HumanCockroach wrote:GB does match up well in one area, and it is the area I thought would allow them a victory, unfortunately at-30 to-50 bellow that area becomes kind of irrelevant. GB needed to be able to pass the ball, and do so early and often, going to be hard to accomplish that by throwing around a frozen rock......
savvyman wrote:The Over/Under for the game is at 47.
Wish I was in Vegas - I would place a bet on the Under.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests