NorthHawk wrote:That's certainly a lot of talent to lose in one year, but sometimes adversity brings out the best in people.
Any depth they had will be tested, and they still have some talent on the team.
With parity in the NFL, they can't be taken lightly by any team. By that I mean on any given Sunday...
That being said, it will take a huge effort to have a winning record, in my opinion.
NorthHawk wrote:Yeah, but the Seahawks also have a lot of talent, too.
NorthHawk wrote:Yeah, but the Seahawks also have a lot of talent, too.
Old but Slow wrote:The rivalry has been awesome, and I hope that it can reignite in the future. I may be wrong, but the Niners may drop into the cellar in this tough division this year.
Old but Slow wrote:Future, I feel bad for your team losing so many key elements. The rivalry has been awesome, and I hope that it can reignite in the future. I may be wrong, but the Niners may drop into the cellar in this tough division this year. If they can find a way to battle themselves out, more power to them. But there are cycles in the league, as teams rise to the top only to sink as salary cap issues, injuries, retirements, and such take effect. The strength of a front office is the ability to avoid the severe drops that occur when contracts come due, and players leave for financial reasons. So far, the Seahawks have been able to avoid the kind of salary traps that result in huge dead money, and money payed to players long gone.
The Chancellor issue is a big one for the franchise, because although he is a big cog in the machine, changing his contract at this point is like opening a gab in the dam. If they can find a way to give him some guarantees without increasing the bottom line, something might get done. But, finally, no one player is the difference. I love Kam, but to crumble the team to satisfy one player? Not likely.
Old but Slow wrote:Future, I feel bad for your team losing so many key elements. The rivalry has been awesome, and I hope that it can reignite in the future. I may be wrong, but the Niners may drop into the cellar in this tough division this year. If they can find a way to battle themselves out, more power to them. But there are cycles in the league, as teams rise to the top only to sink as salary cap issues, injuries, retirements, and such take effect. The strength of a front office is the ability to avoid the severe drops that occur when contracts come due, and players leave for financial reasons. So far, the Seahawks have been able to avoid the kind of salary traps that result in huge dead money, and money payed to players long gone.
The Chancellor issue is a big one for the franchise, because although he is a big cog in the machine, changing his contract at this point is like opening a gab in the dam. If they can find a way to give him some guarantees without increasing the bottom line, something might get done. But, finally, no one player is the difference. I love Kam, but to crumble the team to satisfy one player? Not likely.
jshawaii22 wrote:Future,
Personally, I think the difference between the 49ers and Seahawks is pretty evident after this off-season.
Kaep will need to score 30 points a game to win
Russell will need to score 17 points a game to win
How many wins each team gets is dependent on their QB's to perform at that level. Now who do you think has a better chance to meet those goals over 16 games?
HumanCockroach wrote:Crabs indeed was, was Gore as well? He never struck me that way, and he was attempting to avoid casting shade on Kaps deficiencies, but certainly did. That's two key offensive players that directly question Kaps ability, desire and leadership.
Futureite wrote:
BTW - and speaking of leadership - I just read an NFL.Com article about a "deep rift" (direct quote) that had developed between Wilson and his teammates last yr, to the point that he called a meeting in Hawaii to resolve it.
mykc14 wrote:Yeah, Crabtree is a moron. Sure you left the niners because you wanted a better QB... so you PICKED the Raiders. I like what Carr did last year but that is not why you went to Oakland. They were the ones who gave you the most $. He has always been about the benjamins and will continue to be. If the niners offered him more he easily would have signed with them.
kalibane wrote:Crabtree was a flop before Kaep so this seems weird, if anyone should be complaining it's Vernon Davis.
RiverDog wrote:Ya and for the record RW is a better QB than Kap.
And that's some sort of revelation or admission? Half of the starting quarterbacks in the league are better than Kaepernick.
RiverDog wrote:Your appraisal of Kaepernick isn't what needs amending. What you need to amend is your appraisal of Russell Wilson. He's more than just a little bit better than Kaep, he's a lot better, so much better that the two should not be mentioned in the same breath. But you keep cherry picking RW's bad performances, posting false or misleading information about his leadership qualities, and so on, anything you can think of to bring him down a couple of notches. That's what needs to be corrected if you want to be taken seriously and quit being thought of as a troll.
Futureite wrote:Please just shut the hell up with your fact citing.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests