Uppercut wrote:Beasts Mama called for Bevell to be fired! LOL
http://blog.seattlepi.com/football/2015/09/15/marshawn-lynchs-mother-thinks-seattle-seahawks-offensive-coordinator-darrell-bevell-should-be-fired/
Very Unimaginative Coach. Has been getting by because of the D!
Mike Martz maybe be rested and ready
Anthony wrote:
My son knows her and they talk a lot. Some interesting things, did you know when Wilson is calling the plays he checks with Lynch to make sure they are on the same page. Did you also know Mama Lynch thinks the offense would run much much better if Wilson called all the plays. Also Wilson is not allowed to audible at all unless hurry up, up tempo, 2 minute drill which is the only time he gets to call the plays. Also even during those times if Bevel radios in a play he has to go with it. She said you can tell when Wilson calls the plays because they move the ball. LOL
mykc14 wrote:
That's some good inside info. The Hawks do seem to play their best offensively in the hurry up, sometimes they even seem unstoppable. With that being said Peteball calls for the offense to grind the ball and control the clock so I would be surprised to see them employ this on a regular basis, expect for obvious 2 minute situations and possibly when the offense is looking for a spark.
SalmonBB wrote:What's frustrating is that we have not played the read option since the regualr season last year. It was effective. They lined up a few times like they were running it this past weekend, but you're not really running it if only the RB runs the ball. I got it ... there's all types of excuses not to run the QB, like "we can't risk our franchise QB getting hit," and "defenses are 'spying' RW now." Regarding the first, if running RW is what opens up the offense and it is effective, and it is what he does well ... then why pay him the money we're paying him to be an okay pocket passer? Plus we don't have to run him all the time ... maybe just 2 or three times a game. Regarding not running him because he's being "spied," since when has RW had a hard time getting around someone "spying" him?
Simply put, when RW runs, we get first downs. We open up the run game for Beast-Mode. We open up the pass. Our offense gets better. But someone is insisting that our QB try to sit tight and be Peyton Manning. When we go into the game with that mentality, this offense becomes very frustrating to watch ... because they are not getting to play to their strengths.
GO SEAHAWKS!!!
SalmonBB wrote:Simply put, when RW runs, we get first downs. We open up the run game for Beast-Mode. We open up the pass. Our offense gets better. But someone is insisting that our QB try to sit tight and be Peyton Manning. When we go into the game with that mentality, this offense becomes very frustrating to watch ... because they are not getting to play to their strengths.
GO SEAHAWKS!!!
obiken wrote:There is no way that you allow a just paid Franchise QB to run around like the past 3 years. I agree, its good for the team but with this OL can you really afford to get him hurt? Clay Mathews is just waiting to lay the wood to this guy.
SalmonBB wrote:And Clay Matthews is waiting to lay the wood to him no matter where he is.
From what I saw last week, RW may be safer on the outside running around than he is inside, anyway. If RW doesn't run, and they know he's staying home, then all the defense does is collapse the pocket, and they send one or two extra than if they didn't know what was coming. Then we've just reduced him from being a great QB that this offense was made for - and that we are paying for - into to a mediocre pocket passer. One who is getting sacked over an over. Because of fear, we will settle for mediocrity. Because we fear Clay Matthews. And because we'll fear whoever it is the next week. It is not the right way to think.
If, on the other hand, we let RW run a few times a game on deliberate run plays (I'd be happy with twice in a game at this point), I think we'll see the return of our running game, and our passing game - from in and out of the pocket.
Did we just buy a Mercedes, only to keep it in the garage? Boy, isn't that great!
I don't believe in living in fear. It's tough enough to win any given Sunday, but if you're playing conservatively, then goodbye to the possibility. I know Pete Carroll doesn't believe in that either, which makes me think that instead of being fearful, maybe he and Bevell are trying to prove something about RW's ability as a pocket guy. But that's idiotic, and that would go against Carroll's philosophy of planning around the individual strengths of his players. I don't know why they are making RW stay home, but whatever the reason, they need to drop it and let him play.
GO SEAHAWKS!!!
SalmonBB wrote:And Clay Matthews is waiting to lay the wood to him no matter where he is.
From what I saw last week, RW may be safer on the outside running around than he is inside, anyway. If RW doesn't run, and they know he's staying home, then all the defense does is collapse the pocket, and they send one or two extra than if they didn't know what was coming. Then we've just reduced him from being a great QB that this offense was made for - and that we are paying for - into to a mediocre pocket passer. One who is getting sacked over an over. Because of fear, we will settle for mediocrity. Because we fear Clay Matthews. And because we'll fear whoever it is the next week. It is not the right way to think.
If, on the other hand, we let RW run a few times a game on deliberate run plays (I'd be happy with twice in a game at this point), I think we'll see the return of our running game, and our passing game - from in and out of the pocket.
Did we just buy a Mercedes, only to keep it in the garage? Boy, isn't that great!
I don't believe in living in fear. It's tough enough to win any given Sunday, but if you're playing conservatively, then goodbye to the possibility. I know Pete Carroll doesn't believe in that either, which makes me think that instead of being fearful, maybe he and Bevell are trying to prove something about RW's ability as a pocket guy. But that's idiotic, and that would go against Carroll's philosophy of planning around the individual strengths of his players. I don't know why they are making RW stay home, but whatever the reason, they need to drop it and let him play.
GO SEAHAWKS!!!
SalmonBB wrote:Got ya' Obi! We're on the same sheet! Man, I hope the Seahawks put something together this weekend.
GO SEAHAWKS!!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests