Mostly positive article by a very prestigious magazine.
http://www.rollingstone.com/sports/feat ... e-20150826
c_hawkbob wrote:I would guess its editorial focus. But whatever you want to call Rolling Stone, it's cachet is undeniable.
monkey wrote:This article was nothing more than a way of taking a shot at Wilson for his faith and a smear at the "personality type" that would believe as Wilson does.
I thought this article was loathsome, poorly written, rambling, nearly incoherent, and overtly anti religious.
monkey wrote:This article was nothing more than a way of taking a shot at Wilson for his faith and a smear at the "personality type" that would believe as Wilson does.
I thought this article was loathsome, poorly written, rambling, nearly incoherent, and overtly anti religious.
Seahawks4Ever wrote:RD; what do you have against Rolling Stone magazine??
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests