Uppercut wrote:4 games and 0 iNT's
Uppercut wrote:4 games and 0 iNT's
4a- Graham gives up on plays way too early. Hopefully it's just a matter of adjusting to Wilson, but he can't stop and stand straight up while Russ is still scrambling.
Distant Relative wrote:
Graham is a major Liability when it comes to blocking. I don't care how good of a receiver you are... BLOCK! for F sake. I was disgusted by his lack of effort on nearly every block he attempted. He's gonna get Wilson killed. What pisses me off is he wants the ball so much but doesn't seem interested in helping someone else out. Dude doesn't seem like a team player to me and IMO isn't a good fit for the Hawks.
obiken wrote:I was one of those that said, with no happiness being a prophet, that picking up a 34 year old RB was a huge waste. I like Rawls and it Lynch comes back for Cincy we will be fine.
We have to win this game otherwise we could be 2-4 in a hurry, and too far behind to catch up. Our OL has to improve, period.
The good news is that we won the game, one that we should have won much easier, and that could be a wakeup call for the team that you can't just mail it in against a team you are expected to beat.
burrrton wrote:I don't think we mailed anything in- we simply had an overmatched offensive line.
It's concerning to be sure, but I think the gloomy feeling surrounding the game is due to that single weakness. If they can manage to be merely mediocre against Cincy, I think we win.
obiken wrote:Steven A Smith called our offense anemic, bland, pedestrian, vanilla.
I'm a little less optimistic about the Cincy game than you are.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 128 guests