Hawk Sista wrote:I half way get the questions on Bevel, Graham and even Beast Mode, but now Pete? The last three years represent the winning-est stretch in FRANCHISE HOISTORY and includes two trips to the SB with our one and only Lombardi. Now is the time to quit with the panic and stop questioning the shelf life of the man who has brought a winning culture to Seattle. We may not win the Super Bowl this year (I think we still may) but I seriously doubt we have a losing record, or even miss the playoffs.
Before you answer your own question, answer this one...do you remember the 90s? Look at the historic win-loss records for the Hawks and ask that again.
Hawk Sista wrote:I half way get the questions on Bevel, Graham and even Beast Mode, but now Pete? The last three years represent the winning-est stretch in FRANCHISE HOISTORY and includes two trips to the SB with our one and only Lombardi. Now is the time to quit with the panic and stop questioning the shelf life of the man who has brought a winning culture to Seattle. We may not win the Super Bowl this year (I think we still may) but I seriously doubt we have a losing record, or even miss the playoffs.
Before you answer your own question, answer this one...do you remember the 90s? Look at the historic win-loss records for the Hawks and ask that again.
c_hawkbob wrote:Problem is you're adapting the OP to fit your 'plausible' box. The way I read the OP Obi was positing that adding Pete's years at USC together with his years here put him at or near his expiration date as a viable head coach, not that he may chose to leave.
savvyman wrote:I nominate this thread title as the dumbest topic yet here at the shack.
obiken wrote:
Sorry you feel that way. This is not what I was trying to say. I am not trying to force Pete out at all. I was throwing out a theoretical discussion, with a practicum example. Just forget it.
Users browsing this forum: Oly and 135 guests