Hawktawk wrote:You need to give it a rest Anthony. The defense got turnovers. The defense scored MOF it was the defense that staked out the 17 point lead. The game was served up on a platter to the offense to just get a few first downs and close the deal. Instead its a 2-1 TOP for the Bengals in the 4th quarter and Seattle 3 and outs its last 5 possessions including 2 in overtime. Its pathetic.You are suspending your disbelief to say it isn't.
Crappy teams point fingers and play the blame game. Great teams have 3 phases of guys who have each others 6 and pick them up when they need to. Our offense has not done that this year, sorry they bear plenty of the blame for our record.
HumanCockroach wrote:So the fact that Seattle's TOP two of those three losses was greater than 8 minutes ( and the third loss it was two to one in OT and the fourth quarter) has no baring on anything? Ok. Yep, sure.
RiverDog wrote:OK, Factsman. We've scored 111 points this season, with 28 of those, or a full 25% of our production, courtesy of the defense and special teams. Factor out those 28 points and we are scoring 16.6 PPG, good enough to be tied for 29th best in the league (not accounting for other team's D/ST scoring).
I don't care how good our defense is, we are not going to win more than 50% of our games with an offense that scores less than 17 points per game.
The #1 reason for our 2-3 record has been the performance of our offense and with it, the leader of all offenses, the quarterback.
Anthony wrote:Thats great but non of that changes the fact they had a 17 point lead with under 15 minutes to go and could not hold it. period
RiverDog wrote:But the fact is that there was more than one reason why we did not hold that 17 point lead with 15 minutes to go.
Period.
Anthony wrote:And yet all y9ou and others want to do is blame wilson and the offense, and the fact show it is as much if not more on the defense, Let me guess we los to today because of Wilson and the offense too, right? The reality is until PC gets it through his think skull that you cannot hand this defense a lead of any kind and except them to hold it we will continue to loose.
kalibane wrote:But if you watched Russell Wilson tuck and run for 7 yards instead of pushing the ball down the field with 29 seconds left and think he doesn't need to step it up, you are smoking crack.
The 4 minute drill used to be one of the things this team did best. Now it's terrible at it.
kalibane wrote:On defense the lack of depth in the secondary is killing us. Cary Williams is terrible and Shead is showing why he's a backup (that TD was his fault, he was supposed to carry Olson up the seam to Thomas).
That being said. Anthony, you need to stop with the pathological defense of Russell Wilson. I'm not going to change my tune from the fact that the Offensive Line is the absolute biggest issue on the team. And I think that Bevell's crunch time play calling is #2. But if you watched Russell Wilson tuck and run for 7 yards instead of pushing the ball down the field with 29 seconds left and think he doesn't need to step it up, you are smoking crack.
The 4 minute drill used to be one of the things this team did best. Now it's terrible at it.
Anthony wrote:I am not defending Wilson I am trying to let a few people get that the defense is a problem this year as well. The reality is we never should have been in the situation for his to tuck and run, what would you like him to do get sacked. throw the ball to ahh no one since the announcers said no one was open? I am not saying the Wilson has not been part of the issue, to me eveyr9one has but he is far down on the list. When you consider play calling is an issue, play design is an issue, oline is an issue, Just how can you expect much more out of any QB. That is a lot to overcome for anybody. That is why if the oline was great and this was happening I would be more on Wilson, but when your oline sucks, your play calling sucks, your play design sucks what exactly can any Qb do. No QB in the league can over come all of those things. So that is why I put him near the bottom of my list but he is still on it. To me it starts with the HC, then Dc, and OC, then oline and you can keep going from there and some were below 5 is were Wilson is.
RiverDog wrote:
Stop it, Anthony! You are too defending Wilson, in just about every thread, including this one!
On first down from the 10 with 29 seconds left, even with no one open, Russell would have been better off to throw it up for grabs and hope for a defensive pass interference penalty that would have gotten the ball out close to midfield. If he was successful in drawing a penalty, it would have stopped the clock with about 20 seconds, saved a timeout, and given us at least two and probably 3 more plays, meaning he would not have had to even thrown a Hail Mary. He could have thrown another 20-30 yard pass, and if that was successful, taken one or two legitimate shots at the end zone. Tucking the ball and running had a much, much less of a chance of improving our situation.
RiverDog wrote:OK, Factsman. We've scored 111 points this season, with 28 of those, or a full 25% of our production, courtesy of the defense and special teams. Factor out those 28 points and we are scoring 16.6 PPG, good enough to be tied for 29th best in the league (not accounting for other team's D/ST scoring).
I don't care how good our defense is, we are not going to win more than 50% of our games with an offense that scores less than 17 points per game.
#1 reason for our 2-3 record has been the performance of our offense and with it, the leader of all offenses, the quarterback.
HumanCockroach wrote:Actually, you are being generous there RD. The offense has provided less points than that, as there are multiple times the defense or STs provided the ball in FG range, the offense did nothing, and they kicked a FG. I have them at 15.6 points a game ( Less per game than the 2-14 Seahawks offense, that had Stouffer, Gelbaugh and McGwire at the reigns).
Are you worried yet Bob? Or do I need to wait three more weeks still?
Are you worried yet Bob? Or do I need to wait three more weeks still?
c_hawkbob wrote:
You can throw in the towel whenever it suits you Roach, you don't need my permission ... but as long as you asked ; man up buttercup, hold your water. When the math says we're out of it, we're out of it.
I'm sick to death of waiting for this O-line to gel and watching our defense evaporate in the 4th quarter too, but I can still easily see us making a move. There's a lot of season left. There's still time to get this year turned around and even if this year doesn't get turned around that doesn't mean next year has to follow the same script as this year has.
The biggest problem most teams (and all fan bases) have is the inability to resist the urge to 'blow it all up' and start over at the first hint of adversity.
5 year rule. (year 2)
You can throw in the towel whenever it suits you Roach, you don't need my permission ... but as long as you asked
out of it, we're out of it.
obiken wrote:We lose Thursday then is over and if I'm betting its a tough bet to bet against SF at this point in time. IF we can then we win, then win the following week we will be 4-4 going into Zona. Lose this and it is really over.
obiken wrote:Sure, the big ones River are the mediocre teams on the road, you know as well as I do that average teams play well at home and against us!
c_hawkbob wrote:[
You can throw in the towel whenever it suits you Roach, you don't need my permission ... but as long as you asked ; man up buttercup, hold your water. When the math says we're out of it, we're out of it.
I'm sick to death of waiting for this O-line to gel and watching our defense evaporate in the 4th quarter too, but I can still easily see us making a move. There's a lot of season left. There's still time to get this year turned around and even if this year doesn't get turned around that doesn't mean next year has to follow the same script as this year has.
The biggest problem most teams (and all fan bases) have is the inability to resist the urge to 'blow it all up' and start over at the first hint of adversity.
5 year rule. (year 2)
savvyman wrote:Bob - Just because people are pointing out the Obvious short coming in offensive and defensive execution and some terrible coaching decisions - it does not mean that they are advocating "Blowing it all up" or that they are abandoning the team - it means we support our team while keeping a critical eye and mindset for the performance and behavior that is less than championship quality.
obiken wrote:Yeah Savvy you've gotten mean lately. Tone it down or else, you could be out, all the way out, know what I mean.
Seahawks4Ever wrote:OK, did I miss something? I didn't think Savvy was being mean at all, just sarchastic.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 142 guests