depaashaas wrote:competitiveness is one thing River but I understand why they do it this way, they are trying to sell a product (game/advertisement) to the largest audience out there and I can cry all I want about that we are better, more passionate, nicer fans LOL etc, etc. But let's face it whiners, packers, steelers have larger fan base than Hawks and as a tv network you want as many people to tune in as possible to get more $$$ for advertisement and unfortunately the Hawks are not at the same level as some other teams as fan base goes or enemy base for that matter but I know we are closing in on the enemy base LOL. I guess he is trying to put it nicely, I think this was a couple of years ago in the news to and I did not buy into it back then either, it's all about the $$$ at the end of the day and it's fine with me just don't come up with B.S. story
While I agree the money is the driving force, that doesn't explain away the lack of home games, or matchups like the Titans/Jags, or numerous other "competitive" crappy games throughout the season ( and there are many) Seattle had as many PT games as any other team ( and more than all but 3) so the "home" thing matters. Baltimore, NE and Denver all have records at home in prime time comparable to us, and yet all three get the bulk of those games at home, so the large fan base, nor home success, or even money explains it really.
This isn't "new" information, whether some chose to believe it when it was reported the last two years or not, it was known.