The other stunning thing here is how Wilson looks as a conventional quarterback. The naive, shortsighted knock on Wilson -- as much as you can knock a guy who has two Super Bowl trips in three chances -- has always been that he's a quarterback who has to rely on various gimmicks (such as the read-option), wild improvisational scrambles and a dominant running game to serve as an effective quarterback. At 5-foot-11, even after having proved himself as an elite quarterback, Wilson wasn't the sort of prototypical pocket passer the league fetishizes as their platonic ideal of a quarterback.
c_hawkbob wrote:Meh, wearing a jersey is no different than wearing a Led Zepplin or Bob Marley shirt, or having a Marilyn Monroe print on your wall.
What about having Chip Foose or Boyd Coddington signature series wheels on your Hot Rod, or a Summit Racing sticker? Is that OK?
c_hawkbob wrote:Meh, wearing a jersey is no different than wearing a Led Zepplin or Bob Marley shirt, or having a Marilyn Monroe print on your wall.
What about having Chip Foose or Boyd Coddington signature series wheels on your Hot Rod, or a Summit Racing sticker? Is that OK?
Hawk Sista wrote:HEY!!!! Is the "eye test" thing a dig at me for saying Bailey was better than Gilliam? Tell me now
The naive, shortsighted knock on Wilson
Hawk Sista wrote:HEY!!!! Is the "eye test" thing a dig at me for saying Bailey was better than Gilliam? Tell me now
obiken wrote:Thats it. You also have to remember, these are not elite defenses we are beating. Our guys got a lot of yards on runs after catches, and they Browns dropped a boatload of balls tonight, you dont get those against good teams.
obiken wrote:Thats it. You also have to remember, these are not elite defenses we are beating. Our guys got a lot of yards on runs after catches, and they Browns dropped a boatload of balls tonight, you dont get those against good teams.
obiken wrote:Thats it. You also have to remember, these are not elite defenses we are beating. Our guys got a lot of yards on runs after catches, and they Browns dropped a boatload of balls tonight, you dont get those against good teams.
Hawktawk wrote:Russell is in a zone by himself. Where he used to look like a deer in the headlights, nothing seems to bother him now.
Ive never seen Russell Wilson look like a deer in the headlights, ever. He isn't always successful but he is never overwhelmed or panicked.Not sure where you got that one.....
As for starting sooner I think in hindsight 4 of our 5 losses were to very good playoff teams who currently have a TOTAL of 9 losses after 14 weeks and Seattle still could have won all of them.Seattle was unsettled on the line, our stud back was hurt and ineffective and the defense was in disarray. Russ is the only reason we are sniffing the playoffs eking out the amount of offense he did with that train wreck.
Winning the division would have been nice but I actually love the slot Seattle is in. It is now conceivable Seattle will be the team resting players in week 17. At any rate a date with the NFC least winner awaits, followed by a likely rematch with AZ. Seattle has played Carolina so many times its like a division game if they dont stub their toe vs the North winner first. The nice thing is Seattle is red hot when it matters most, late Dec.They have been dominant on the road, playing some of their best football of this era the last couple of outings.
If Russ keeps playing like this we are winning the Superbowl.
RiverDog wrote:
Are you sure that you're not really Anthony? Russell is the only reason this team is sniffing the playoffs? LMAO. Tell that to the defense.
The first 9 games, Russell to me a lot of times looked like a deer in the headlights... or maybe a duck in a shooting range. He was holding onto the ball passing up open receivers, scrambling when he didn't have to scramble, ran into sacks etc. His TD's and first downs were way, way down. He choked away 4th quarter leads. IMO he was playing the worst football of his career up until the last 5 games.
In hindsight, we weren't playing well even against the horrible teams, such as the Lions and Cowboys, two teams that shouldn't have been on the same field as us yet the games were razor thin. Heck, even at home against the Bears our offense struggled in the first half. It wasn't just a matter of a play or two not going our way or a bad call here and there. We were way out of whack, at least offensively. We sucked. That's why I took down my #12 flag. I haven't been that disgusted since the days when Dave Krieg used to fumble without a sole around.
mykc14 wrote:Yeah, the first half of the season we looked bad in general. That has been the only real head scratcher for me with this team. Year in and year out we have to have face adversity, have a come to jesus speech/team meeting, and then we turn it on and go on a 7-1 streak going into the playoffs. The fact that this team needs adversity to reach their potential is a little weird to me. IMO the only thing that really makes sense is most of the roster is made up of guys who have always had their back against the wall. Un-drafted and under-drafted guys who thrive when they face adversity, but maybe lose focus a bit when things are going well. I don't know, but its a head scratcher. It would be really cool to see what this team could do if they played to their potential for a full season.
RiverDog wrote:Are you sure that you're not really Anthony? Russell is the only reason this team is sniffing the playoffs? LMAO. Tell that to the defense.
The first 9 games, Russell to me a lot of times looked like a deer in the headlights... or maybe a duck in a shooting range. He was holding onto the ball passing up open receivers, scrambling when he didn't have to scramble, ran into sacks etc. His TD's and first downs were way, way down. He choked away 4th quarter leads. IMO he was playing the worst football of his career up until the last 5 games.
In hindsight, we weren't playing well even against the horrible teams, such as the Lions and Cowboys, two teams that shouldn't have been on the same field as us yet the games were razor thin. Heck, even at home against the Bears our offense struggled in the first half. It wasn't just a matter of a play or two not going our way or a bad call here and there. We were way out of whack, at least offensively. We sucked. That's why I took down my #12 flag. I haven't been that disgusted since the days when Dave Krieg used to fumble without a sole around.
I define a quarterbacks play largely on what the team achieves, or at least the offense, especially in this day and age. The quarterback is by far the most influential player on the field. He doesn't get all the blame, but he gets a disproportionate share of it when we lose as well as a disproportionate share of the credit when we win.
c_hawkbob wrote:[Oh stop it already. The major difference between Russ now and early in the season is the fact that he's getting enough protection to function the way he's capable of. It's not as though it took him till the last 5 game to finally pull his head out of his arse.
Football starts in the trenches, without decent line play nothing works, but it takes a special talent to do what Russ has been able to do one the guys up front give him the room to operate. We're damn lucky to have him.
Hawktawk wrote:Football starts in the trenches, without decent line play nothing works, but it takes a special talent to do what Russ has been able to do once the guys up front give him the room to operate. We're damn lucky to have him.
Hear Hear Bob..
I agree that a very large reason for Russell's woes was poor play up front. But even so, he was still screwing up. Those offensive linemen didn't suddenly pull their heads out and start playing like Pro Bowlers anymore than Russell did.
Jeez RD you sure you aren't Future/Savvy? Id love to have seen Brady, Manning(benched), Luck (LMAO)Rodgers(very average this year), any of them do any better than Russ with what was happening most of the first 10 weeks in general.
Now the guy is breaking all time records and you still cant lose the chub. Its gone on for 4 weeks too long and you should consult a physician.
Way to much complaining and unrealistic expectations from you as pulling down ones flag would demonstrate.....
Unlike some, my opinion about Russell's first 9 games hasn't changed because of his past 5.
burrrton wrote:Mine hasn't either- he was actually playing pretty well, even in the first 9-10 games, despite the fact that he did run into a couple sacks here and there and missed some open receivers. He was still on pace to have career highs in completion % among other things, wasn't he?
My question to you would be: do you think RW finally figured out it was OK to stand in the pocket to deliver passes, and finally learned where the open receivers were, and finally worked hard enough on his accuracy that he didn't miss them very often?
Or do you think 99% of the improvement came from the o-line which allowed RW to be the same RW without having to panic about a collapsing pocket, etc?
I think the answer's obvious.
Scrambling when he didn't have to, holding onto the ball too long ala TJack, not throwing short to open receivers.
He just wasn't taking that next step and adjusting to the changes in our offense like he has recently.
monkey wrote:Two things I believe. First, Russell Wilson is RIGHT NOW, the single best Qb in football. Period. Browns coaches who are about to be fired for not being good at their job can put him in any teir they like, but unless they are saying that Wilson is the nfl's best Qb, they are wrong.
Second, the idea that suddenly Wilson has just turned it on, or has suddenly "gotten it", is a bunch of nonsense.
Wilson has always had this level of play in him, he just hasn't had the opportunity until now.
What's happening is more a combination of improved line play, and a change in what is being asked if Wilson by the coaches than it is Wilson suddenly getting it, though he has improved. Mostly because he's trusting his line more now.
Simply put, the coaches are asking more of him up compensate for the losses of Lynch and Rawls, and to a lesser d degree, Graham.
This is no mirage either, He's just this good.
burrrton wrote:Right- the question is: did RW suddenly learn he didn't have to scramble, could get rid of the ball more quickly, and hit open receiver on short patterns? Or did the line gel and afford him the opportunity to do all those things without panic and self-preservation overriding it all?
I agree with you that "improved QB play" has been a factor, but my opinion is that the "improved play" was there all along but had no environment in which to shine. You seem to be placing the blame for those shortcomings on RW, rather than on the line, when those shortcomings only exist when the line sucks.
I don't know- maybe it's just a semantic game or picking nits.
The only change I've seen is an o-line blocking well (and maybe better play design, but I don't know that).
HumanCockroach wrote:I'll go with Warren Moon, Pete Carroll and the rest of the coaches, and Wilson himself. BOTH improved. Why people still can't admit that Wilson held the ball to long and wasn't delivering it quickly is beyond me. The coaches have said it, Wilson has said it, HOF QBs have said it, Baldwin even eluded to it.
The Line wasn't playing well, that's a fact, but Wilson certainly wasn't doing them any favors by refusing to deliver the ball underneath to OPEN receivers. By all means, go back and watch some of the all 22 films from earlier in the season. In all honesty, Wilson HAS figured something out. Something CRITICAL for sustained success, IMHO he was so desperately attempting to lose that "game manager" moniker, that he forgot a critical QB basic. That is to take what the defense gives you. QBs like Brady, Manning, Montana etc. Made their CAREERS doing it. Big plays are great, but holding the ball forever waiting for them will sink an offense. Rothlisberger holds the ball forever to, but even he checked down to secondary reads far more often than Wilson was for the first nine games.
Ultimately, Wilson AND the line improved, BOTH created this success, BOTH deserves credit, and BOTH deserved blame. This "Wilson deserves all credit, and never deserves blame" mantra, is the battle cry of fanboys, the SAME battle cry of Luck jock sniffers, or Futures claims about Kaepernik.. Truth is, no QB is perfect, none, none ever have been, none ever will be. The trick is consistency, week in and week out, and Wilson for all of his magic, wasn't that until recently. He was consistent enough for success, and certainly made your jaw drop multiple times, the difference IMHO is that he seems to have grown to the point now of being able to recognise WHEN that needs to happen, and takes what is given the rest of the time.
His short and midrange decision making has improved drastically, he is getting the ball out of his hand, trusting his receivers and reads, and making quick decisive throws.
But neither did the offensive linemen suddenly learn how to hold their blocks.
burrrton wrote:Perhaps 99% is over the top, though. RW was doing some uncharacteristic things early on that can't fairly be laid at the line's feet.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 126 guests