Hawk Sista wrote:I heard Richard say in his post game interview that he did not get a jump on this one as it would have given them a first down. That would have (or I guess after yesterday's outcome - I should say could have) sealed the deal. With 20 seconds left, we had a teensy bit of a shot. I had already shifted to Lockett's return, field position and Hauschka was warming up.
RiverDog wrote: I'll bet that there's more than a couple Cincinnati fans that wish their players had game smarts like Sherm has.
Seahawks4Ever wrote:...Walsh said that he didn't follow through the kick but I saw what you all saw, that his plant foot was forward of the ball, never a good idea. He obviously felt rushed...
Never understood defending a bad call.
BillA wrote:An article (with pictures) explaining the Blair Walsh missed field goal.
http://insidethepylon.com/film-study/film-study-nfl/special-teams-film-study-nfl/2016/01/10/explaining-blair-walsh-missed-field-goal/
Go Hawks,
BillA
burrrton wrote:I don't think Kam's PI was a great call, but it's definitely defensible.
The bigger argument against the Vikings' claims to deserving the win are that they didn't do sht all day, either, and were only gifted their 3 FGs due to cold-related errors and miscues.
When all your 'scoring drives' total ~60 yards *combined*, you don't get to call us "lucky" because you missed a FG kicking into a 25-below wind with your holder wearing gloves.
Said it before: you lived by the bizarre conditions, you died by the bizarre conditions.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 138 guests