mykc14 wrote:Can't spot a team 31 points regardless of the field. The pick 6 Wilson threw was the worst play of his career so far.
Hawk Sista wrote:Be mad at Russ if you must. We wouldn't have scored 24 points w/o him.
Hawk Sista wrote:Be mad at Russ if you must. We wouldn't have scored 24 points w/o him.
Seahawks4Ever wrote:"We didn't lose the game, we just ran out of time" -Vince Lombardi
We wouldn't have ran out of time though if Wilson & Co. would have had some sense of urgency. Oh, and clock management by Wilson was really suspect for much of the season. Pete needs to work on his clock management too, he also needs to have someone he trusts so he won't waste challenges and time outs when he loses them.
Note to Pete, TAKE THE FG MAN!!! Coming away with ZERO points at the end of the 1st. half HURT US BIG TIME, today and last week too.
This was a winnable game, but a few players and coaches didn't show up in the first quarter. Bevell and Wilson cost us the game in the first few minutes, it is ALL on RW.
It is going to take me awhile to calm down over this fiasco.
Anyway, Go Panthers, I want the Panthers to go get their first Lombardi!!!
savvyman wrote:I am quite certain that over the next three hours you will see comments about the field and comments how the seahawks probably adjusted\changed their shoes or cleats to adapt.
It was obvious to me that the players shoes were not suitable for that crappy field to start the game. Check out the game thread - I commented on that after the second play of the game.
Note - I am not blaming the field entirely for the loss - I am blaming the field for the Seahawks falling behind 21 - 0....... Which contributed as a cause for the loss more than any other "Factor" in this loss.
monkey wrote:Agreed that the staff needs to make the correction to the field conditions, MUCH earlier.
Points scored in 1st halves of playoff games under Wilson.
at WSH – 13 points
at ATL – 0 points
vs. NO – 16 points
vs. SF – 3 points
vs. DEN – 22 points (9 points off D/ST)
vs. CAR – 14 points
vs. GB – 0 points
vs. NE – 14 points
at MIN – 0 points
at CAR – 0 points
Seattle didn’t lead in the first halves of 7 of those games.
IMO this points to an unwillingness or inability to adjust to the inability to run the ball. I get that we are always TRYING to establish the run, but being stubborn about it, to the point where you are consistently having to dig yourself out of points deficits, is maddeningly silly.
Also, there's simply no reason to insist on slow developing pass pas, (5 and 7 step drops, and deep play action routes) when the run isn't working, and or the offensive line isn't giving enough time, and yet Bevell INSISTS on calling those kinds of plays to start virtually every game.
Drives me up a freakin wall.
Agent 86 wrote:Ya know, for a 4-5 start this season ended up with some hope going forward. The D is still mostly intact, and the O should be better if the O-line can start off the season on the right foot. I believe the window is still wide open, Pete and John are going to have to draft well and sign the right FA's to keep this thing going. A big key will be when to let go of certain players. New England has always shown the ability to let go of players 1 year too early rather than 1 year too late.
savvyman wrote:Well you got to hand it to Carolina - They pulled the fast one with creating a field that would completely neutralize our team biggest strength - Our Speed - and by the time the Hawks had adjusted the hole was way to deep.
However - Props to Pete and the players who battled back to almost be in a position to win. I think they call this "Grit".
Savvy if you look at the official game thread I called the field about post 5. As the quicker team I knew it would affect us more and its simply horseshit to have an NFL field in a billion dollar industry look remotely like that. I manage a golf course and have to create playable conditions on about 90 acres of turf. It astounds me how bad some of these 2 acre fields are with what's available in terms of technology and the advances in agronomy. I could make it look like a pool table in my sleep. The NFL should have an agronomist who evaluates these natural turf fields much the same as the USGA polices courses that hold PGA events. If they aren't right control should be seized by the league. Players health is on the line as much as the competitive advantage I will volunteer. Between these guys and the redskins Its as bad as I have ever seen.
obiken wrote:That's why they call it HOMEFIELD HT. Their circus, their monkeys. They can whatever they want folks.
burrrton wrote:
How about if they seal the edges and have the game played in 2 feet of water?
Old but Slow wrote:I agree with Monkey's comment about the slow developing plays. Note that when Russell was given plays where he got the ball out of his hand quickly, we began to move the ball. That has been a pattern all year, with slow developing screens, 7 step drops, and looking for the big play. If protection would allow it, that works, but with the center of the line being gashed by the defensive line, it makes no sense. It can work only if mixed in with a few quick hitters.
Again it was frustrating to see how slowly we get plays called and how many delay penalties and unnecessary times out we incur. Bevell can be very good, but when he's bad, he's really bad.
RiverDog wrote:
No kidding about the play calling. I've never seen a Hawks team have so much difficulty getting plays in. It's embarrassing to have to spend your timeouts on a 3rd and 18 to avoid a delay of game penalty. You can't be doing that when you're behind by multiple scores and are almost certainly going to need those timeouts if we were to have any chance at all of coming back and winning.
Russell's penchant for holding onto the ball too long on the 7 step drops is the flip side of all those amazing Houdini escapes and ad lib plays. We can't have it both ways, on the one hand complaining about Russell holding onto the ball too long while on the other hand lauding him for his scrambles and extending plays.
Hawktawk wrote:Savvy if you look at the official game thread I called the field about post 5. As the quicker team I knew it would affect us more and its simply horseshit to have an NFL field in a billion dollar industry look remotely like that.I manage a golf course and have to create playable conditions on about 90 acres of turf. It astounds me how bad some of these 2 acre fields are with whats available in terms of technology and the advances in agronomy.I could make it look like a pool table in my sleep. The NFL should have an agronomist who evaluates these natural turf fields much the same as the USGA polices courses that hold PGA events. If they aren't right control should be seized by the league.Players health is on the line as much as the competitive advantage I will volunteer. Between these guys and the redskins Its as bad as I have ever seen.
savvyman wrote:Well you got to hand it to Carolina - They pulled the fast one with creating a field that would completely neutralize our team biggest strength - Our Speed - and by the time the Hawks had adjusted the hole was way to deep.
However - Props to Pete and the players who battled back to almost be in a position to win. I think they call this "Grit".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 134 guests