burrrton wrote:How about we meet at Twigs (I'll buy drinks), and you have your wife go into the men's room and drop trow in the stall. I'll walk in and if I can tell you the color of her undies, you make my next house payment.
Of course I'm being a bit facetious (I would never disrespect your wife like that), but I'm confident I'd win that bet (and I will buy drinks if you ever want to meet up).
obiken wrote:Riv, do you still live in the Tri-Cities?
burrrton wrote:Hate bumping old threads unless they're moving some nut's thread down the page, but: the solution, alluded to here by many, expressed in some blog post as excerpted here but also by others:
If a company or public facility truly feels that they must jump into this entire “degendering” fiasco, then in addition to traditional facilities for each gender, simply add on a third, gender neutral bathroom or other facility. Then anyone going in can be informed that there is no gender requirement for occupancy and, likewise, the owner/management offers no guarantee as to the gender of the other patrons you may encounter in there. Alternately, when new facilities are constructed, put in multiple, single user facilities and just label them as “shower” or “bathroom” or “changing room.”
It's not cheap, but it has the advantage of not being comically asinine.
You want to be 'forward thinking', Target? Put *your* money where your mouth is (something the modern left is almost 100% unwilling to do these days).
burrrton wrote:Hate bumping old threads unless they're moving some nut's thread down the page, but: the solution, alluded to here by many, expressed in some blog post as excerpted here but also by others:
If a company or public facility truly feels that they must jump into this entire “degendering” fiasco, then in addition to traditional facilities for each gender, simply add on a third, gender neutral bathroom or other facility. Then anyone going in can be informed that there is no gender requirement for occupancy and, likewise, the owner/management offers no guarantee as to the gender of the other patrons you may encounter in there. Alternately, when new facilities are constructed, put in multiple, single user facilities and just label them as “shower” or “bathroom” or “changing room.”
It's not cheap, but it has the advantage of not being comically asinine.
You want to be 'forward thinking', Target? Put *your* money where your mouth is (something the modern left is almost 100% unwilling to do these days).
But see, the problem is, there are people who are leading this charge who really don't WANT a solution, what they want is the continued controversy. It's how they make money.
It's no different than all the race baiters out there whose very income is reliant on NOT solving the racism problem. They are actively looking for things to complain about, so that they make money.
monkey wrote:Yep, that's been the solution I've advocated to everyone who will listen. But see, the problem is, there are people who are leading this charge who really don't WANT a solution, what they want is the continued controversy. It's how they make money.
It's no different than all the race baiters out there whose very income is reliant on NOT solving the racism problem. They are actively looking for things to complain about, so that they make money.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 124 guests