Hawktawk wrote:
My fear is Rawls ankle will not be the same. If it is he will lead the league in rushing. If not Micheal may be starting. I'm rooting hard for option A.If Rawls is ready and plays 16 games Seattle may not lose.
monkey wrote:Today Rawls said that he will for sure be ready for training camp.
http://www.fieldgulls.com/2016/7/10/12142210/seahawks-rb-thomas-rawls-says-hell-be-full-go-by-start-of-training
I don't know about y'all, but man that gets me excited!
Choo choo! Thomas the Train is back on track 12.
Hawktawk wrote:Not too many guys are as strong as the Beast was but Rawls isnt weak by any means. I saw him level a few people when he had to. MOF the play he got hurt on he was playing die hard with about 4 guys when he got his ankle rolled up on. If the schwerve is still there the guy may lead the league in rushing.
If he plays like that for 10 years hes going to have HOF credentials and the Hawks are going to have a lot more hardware. I'm drooling at the mouth with the potential of this franchise.
monkey wrote:I too agree that he had uncanny balance, (that's inarguable), because of his wide stance. I agree also that his tenacity was second to none.
I don't agree that there are "a lot of running backs with Beast's strength".
Name one. Seriously, name just one. I cannot think of one running back as strong as Marshawn, not one playing at the time he played anyway.
Adrian Peterson is the closest. He is an incredibly strong athlete. But Marshawn is BRUTALLY strong.
RiverDog wrote:.Eddie Lacy is IMO every bit as strong as Beast. Same height (5'11), same speed (4.44), but significantly heavier (234 vs 215). More than any other back currently playing, Lacy is the one that reminds me the most of Beast.
monkey wrote:Interesting. No offense meant but, I couldn't disagree more strongly.
Lacy is a fat, slow, wannabe Jerome Bettis with not even half the talent. He's not even in Marshawn's league in terms of strength, and run power. The league is littered with guys who run harder and weigh less than the grossly overrated Lacy.
He reminds me nothing whatsoever of Lynch. The last player to truly remind me of Lynch was the Cowboys Marion Barber. The biggest difference was, Marshawn was faster, and stayed healthier longer.
It's all good though We can disagree on this.
HumanCockroach wrote:http://www.nfl.com/player/eddielacy/2540168/careerstats
http://www.nfl.com/player/marshawnlynch ... areerstats
Interesting, when looking for the back currently playing most similar to Lynch, I ALWAYS point to Lacy ( though to be fair, it's the productive Lacy, not the plodding two tons of fun version the Pack rolled out last season).
Their running styles are incredibly similar, power, refusal to go down etc. That isn't an insult to Lynch, as Lacy isn't even approaching his production or success, that doesn't remove the similarities.
Lacy was fantastic his rookie year, and followed that with an impressive sophomore season. The only thing holding Lacy back is Lacy, the talent is undeniable, and from all reports he's lost a ton of that fat. Whether he approaches Lynch is a question, however in two of his three seasons he's rushed for more than 1100 yards.
I'm not dismissing Lynch in any way, just find those knocks so far out of whack as to say something. You don't GET to the NFL being fat, slow and lazy, and if you become that way you're on a one way ticket the hell out of the league fast.
Lacy has weight concerns, but until last season, it didn't in any way limit his success ( anymore than Lynch chronic back pain). Even last season was a "productive" if unspectacular year with nearly 800 yards rushing in a limited role.
monkey wrote:OK, so, I'll give you Lacy, (it's really subjective isn't it) and say he's got enough similarities to Marshawn to be a fair comparison (though with a LOT less talent than Lynch!), but then you have to give me this one.
Thomas Rawls = Curt Warner
I'll just post this here, as it's good, related to Rawls, and is what reminded me of the similarities between those two again. (I've often thought Rawls should wear #28.)
http://www.fieldgulls.com/2016/7/17/12187034/curt-warner-thomas-rawls-seahawks-running-back-rookies-injury-ypa-dvoa
Zorn76 wrote:IMO, Rawls is the biggest x-factor for this season.
The OL needed the overhaul it received. A healthy, explosive RB, will help offset the pressure they'll be facing in a big way, especially during the first few games.
Hawktawk wrote:Well Oj Simpson had some pretty good cut moves too, on and unfortunately off the field. The Hawks signed a veteran lineman whose name escapes me who had blocked for the juice in buffalo. He said Warner had the moves but didn't quite have the same speed..
Lynch is the greatest Hawks back ever.#2 SA, #3 Warner #4 ?
NorthHawk wrote:Rawls and Graham not participating in the first practice.
Don't know if it's just an abundance of caution or not.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 89 guests