NorthHawk wrote:I didn't read the link, but I think it became his team last year when Lynch then Rawls went out.
He took the reins and succeeded with a changed Offense.
NorthHawk wrote:As a matter of circumstances, the Offensive load was dumped on him and he excelled.
I hope the run game can return to when Lynch was dominating, but it's good to know they can change things up if needed.
We're now a multi-dimensional Offense, and teams will have to plan for it.
Hawktawk wrote:Its always been Wilsons team, grumbling about excessive whiteness. too much off field pub, whatever, notwithstanding.The guy has been the leader from day one.
NorthHawk wrote:As a matter of circumstances, the Offensive load was dumped on him and he excelled.
I hope the run game can return to when Lynch was dominating, but it's good to know they can change things up if needed.
We're now a multi-dimensional Offense, and teams will have to plan for it.
RiverDog wrote:
I disagree. You wouldn't be hearing rumors about Russell not being black enough, players messing around with his wife, et al if he were the undisputed, unquestioned leader. He was one of many leaders, not 'The Man' in the same way a Brady, Rodgers, or Manning would be thought of. That seems to have changed.
Hawktawk wrote:Wow
a lot of vitriol there. It inst Wilson's fault that some of the guys couldn't crack the starting lineup day one like he did. If they could have maybe they wouldn't have been 7-9 with Hass, Whitehurst and Tavaris?
Jesus, you people are unbelievable in your Wilson bias
.
Hes been the difference maker. You are delusional if you cant accept that.
HumanCockroach wrote:
Who claimed he wasn't a difference maker? No one on any post said that. People simply didn't in general forget the hundreds of moves that built this team because of being enamored with one player. Teams are a collective success, not an individual one.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 159 guests