OK GM's... Explain This.

Official Seahawks Forum, for the 12th man, by the 12th man.

OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby jshawaii22 » Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:35 pm

http://www.seattlepi.com/sports/footbal ... 201983.php


Not one, but two trades for safeties, and I thought the depth of the back 4 of the D was the 'strength' of the team... evidently the GM and Coaches had a different opinion.
User avatar
jshawaii22
Legacy
 
Posts: 1948
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:32 am

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby MackStrongIsMyHero » Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:40 pm

Only thing I can figure, and this is without any research either player, is that they are looking for someone to fill the role they tried to create for Brandon Browner.

Even that doesn't make a lot of sense; I don't know why else they would do this, especially right before final cuts. So you're going to cut guys that have been in training camp and played in all the preseason for two guys that have had zero reps with the defense. Head-scratcher.
User avatar
MackStrongIsMyHero
Legacy
 
Posts: 1095
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 5:26 pm
Location: Baton Rouge, LA 70802

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby burrrton » Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:48 pm

Head-scratcher.


Yup- I can't explain this, either. Anyone?
User avatar
burrrton
Legacy
 
Posts: 4213
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:20 am

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby c_hawkbob » Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:50 pm

We were expecting BB to be in the mix at Safety but Pete said he "ran out of time" learning the position so we find ourselves in need of shoring up our depth there.

Secondary will always be the least of my concerns while Pete's around.
User avatar
c_hawkbob
Legacy
 
Posts: 6976
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 3:34 pm
Location: Paducah Kentucky, 42001

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby NorthHawk » Sat Sep 03, 2016 5:43 pm

They also don't have many LB's.
I wonder if the Defense is evolving into some type of hybrid with Safety's playing LB roles.

Edit
On 2nd look, they have enough LBs, but I still wonder if they are going to use more DBs like said above in the Browner role.
NorthHawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 10648
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:57 am

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby FolkCrusader » Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:57 pm

My guess is the injury report may have some surprises.
FolkCrusader
Legacy
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:51 am

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby mykc14 » Sat Sep 03, 2016 7:00 pm

I'm guessing they like them as special teams players?
mykc14
Legacy
 
Posts: 2753
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 8:45 am

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby jshawaii22 » Sat Sep 03, 2016 8:01 pm

Trade draft picks for, at best, special teams players.. I hope not. Kelcie was a real good p/u last year. I hope these kids prove as valuable.
User avatar
jshawaii22
Legacy
 
Posts: 1948
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:32 am

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby mykc14 » Sat Sep 03, 2016 8:31 pm

jshawaii22 wrote:Trade draft picks for, at best, special teams players.. I hope not. Kelcie was a real good p/u last year. I hope these kids prove as valuable.


I am not saying that they would only be special teams players their whole careers or that JS and PC don't like their upside. At the same time teams use draft picks for special teams players all the time. If they gave up 6th or 7th rounders and these guys became very good special teamers for us I would say it was a pretty good move!
mykc14
Legacy
 
Posts: 2753
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 8:45 am

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby jshawaii22 » Sat Sep 03, 2016 11:16 pm

The PI reported exactly that the team liked them for special teams, and that was the main interest for now.
User avatar
jshawaii22
Legacy
 
Posts: 1948
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:32 am

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby obiken » Sun Sep 04, 2016 12:15 am

Maybe they have a concern about KC and his contract. BTW I have never been a big fan of Simon's. He has had a lot of time and I see nothing special there. Am I wrong??
obiken
Legacy
 
Posts: 3962
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:50 pm
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon 97070

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby HumanCockroach » Sun Sep 04, 2016 12:43 am

Simon was long on potential, short on production...

In coaching the word potential in my book was always a dirty word.. Players tease you with physical ability, but have trouble transitioning that on to the field..
User avatar
HumanCockroach
Legacy
 
Posts: 5133
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: Woodinville, Wa

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby RiverDog » Sun Sep 04, 2016 3:14 am

HumanCockroach wrote:In coaching the word potential in my book was always a dirty word.


10-4. Saying that a player, particularly one that's been around for a few years, has a lot of potential is the PC/coachspeak way of saying that they're either lazy, stupid, or both.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby FolkCrusader » Sun Sep 04, 2016 5:56 am

I think keeping 12 DBs (over 10 last year) and 5 LBs could signal an intention to use 6 or 7 DBs in coverage situations. I agree with the special teams view point as well. The loss of Ricardo Lockette was pretty clear on special teams, they need people to step up.
FolkCrusader
Legacy
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:51 am

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby monkey » Mon Sep 05, 2016 7:15 am

The only thing I can say is, they are both good special teams players, and we honestly needed an upgrade there, and maybe they are still trying to find the right players to implement that role they wanted Browner to play?
Other than that, I'm scratching my head.
User avatar
monkey
Legacy
 
Posts: 1777
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:40 pm

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby HumanCockroach » Mon Sep 05, 2016 4:16 pm

And McCray trade rescinded...
User avatar
HumanCockroach
Legacy
 
Posts: 5133
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: Woodinville, Wa

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby Agent 86 » Mon Sep 05, 2016 5:24 pm

HumanCockroach wrote...And McCray trade rescinded




Yep, McCray trade rescinded due to trade conditions not being satisfied.

The empty roster spot was filled by the signing of fullback/DT Tani Tupou, who was waived on Saturday by the Seahawks as part of the 53 man cuts.

Also some practice squad info in the link below.

http://www.seahawks.com/news/2016/09/05/seahawks-make-roster-moves-and-sign-eight-players-practice-squad
User avatar
Agent 86
Legacy
 
Posts: 684
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:40 pm
Location: Sooke B.C.

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby HawkandBalls » Tue Sep 06, 2016 7:15 am

Agent 86 wrote:
Yep, McCray trade rescinded due to trade conditions not being satisfied.

The empty roster spot was filled by the signing of fullback/DT Tani Tupou, who was waived on Saturday by the Seahawks as part of the 53 man cuts.

Also some practice squad info in the link below.

http://www.seahawks.com/news/2016/09/05/seahawks-make-roster-moves-and-sign-eight-players-practice-squad


I don' t get it. How did he pass a physical for the Niners but not us? Can he play for them after failing a physical?
User avatar
HawkandBalls
Legacy
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 6:49 am

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby NorthHawk » Tue Sep 06, 2016 7:36 am

Welcome HawkandBalls. It's good to see some new posters here.

That's always confused me with the passing or rejecting of players because of physicals.
I wonder if the teams are permitted to have different standards or maybe it's just each doctor has a different opinion?
You often hear about getting a 2nd opinion, so maybe it's that simple.
NorthHawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 10648
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:57 am

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby Seahawks4Ever » Thu Sep 08, 2016 8:58 pm

We had problems on Special Teams last year so maybe that was it. I had really liked Burley and couldn't understand them cutting him either.
Seahawks4Ever
Legacy
 
Posts: 1480
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:56 pm

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby jshawaii22 » Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:02 am

NorthHawk wrote:Welcome HawkandBalls. It's good to see some new posters here.

That's always confused me with the passing or rejecting of players because of physicals.
I wonder if the teams are permitted to have different standards or maybe it's just each doctor has a different opinion?
You often hear about getting a 2nd opinion, so maybe it's that simple.


or.. we traded for him and a few hours later found the other guy to trade for, so decided we really didn't need him, so we gave him back via the 'didn't pass our physical' routine.

js
User avatar
jshawaii22
Legacy
 
Posts: 1948
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:32 am

Re: OK GM's... Explain This.

Postby c_hawkbob » Fri Sep 09, 2016 7:11 am

Either that or he just didn't pass the physical.
User avatar
c_hawkbob
Legacy
 
Posts: 6976
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 3:34 pm
Location: Paducah Kentucky, 42001


Return to Seahawks Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: c_hawkbob, Oly and 109 guests