NorthHawk wrote:The teams you noted are all dangerous teams and could easily win if we are beat up and not playing some of our core players.
RiverDog wrote:I'm never going to be accused of counting my chickens before they hatch, but we have the easiest schedule of all 32 teams in the league....and this was supposed to be a backloaded schedule with our toughest games coming in the 2nd half. But as of today, we don't have a single team in our stretch run that has a winning record.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... -schedule/
The Panthers, Cards, ands Packers, all playoff participants last season, are all floundering while the 49'ers and Rams both suck as we expected them to.
Just goes to show you the difficulty of trying to handicap an NFL schedule in August.
RiverDog wrote:I have to defend the media and talking heads. As far as these predictions go, they were simply reflecting the opinion of the masses.
Hawk Sista wrote:If Britt and ET are both out, I can see us losing to the Bux. It won't be the end of the world if we do - & I hope I'm wrong. But this is the sort of game we lose. East coast, heavy faves etc..
Hawk Sista wrote:If Britt and ET are both out, I can see us losing to the Bux. It won't be the end of the world if we do - & I hope I'm wrong. But this is the sort of game we lose. East coast, heavy faves etc..
Hawktawk wrote:Then came the Monday after....
I think a reassessment of the NFC is in order.
Somewhat quietly the conference is suddenly littered with legitimate contenders. Anyone watching yesterday could see Tampa is coming on.
Frankly I was stunned we were 6 point faves after they had gone in and knocked off KC.
The Falcons are red hot as are the Saints. The Giants are on a roll,currently in second in the conference. Detroit is lights out right now. The Redskins are for real.
Even foundering Caroliina put up 32 points on the road in a close loss to one of the best teams in the AFC.Ill be there next Sunday night but i'm not going to just pencil in seattle after what I just saw.
I'm not even half as confident as I was sunday morning at anything more than a likely division title. Beyond that Seattle will beat nobody with a putrid offensive embarrassment like that.
Rambo2014 wrote:My Take Now after calling the Seahawks game!
Dallas vs Oakland in the SB...Cowboys 24, Oak 13
Hawk Sista wrote:
If Britt and ET are both out, I can see us losing to the Bux. It won't be the end of the world if we do - & I hope I'm wrong. But this is the sort of game we lose. East coast, heavy faves etc
Hawk Sista wrote:I hate to say it, but I felt like we were ripe for a loss....In addition to the aforementioned reasons, a) everyone in our division lost, b) the Bux are no joke - they just went into Arrowhead and beat a very good home Chief team, and c) not that it is an excuse....but the injuries killed us. Make no mistake, Tampa Bay whupped the Hawk's butts - just saying reasons, not excuses. I just wish I would have picked that way in our pool. As I said, those are the kind of games we lose and if the Carolina game were away, I'd say we would lose that one too.
But, my friends, the sky is NOT falling....check it out:
1. ET, Shead, Bennett, Morgan, Coyle, Britt all have a legit chance for being back at the CLINK this weekend......under the lights at the CLINK.
2. The Hawks simply play better when THEY must, and they MUST.
3. RW the perfectionist will not post another shI++y-A$$ game like that for the rest of the season.
4. There is no Seahawk team under any other coach in my memory that can take a loss like that and teach to it, adjust, and come out better for it.
It is ALL still in front of us. All of it.
Hawk Sista wrote:NO game is ever a gimmie, particularly on the road, but NO GAME is ever easy. I think we, as fans check games off as wins more easily than the players and coaches who put a ton of time into preparation.
Remember our super bowl year?? We nearly lost to the Texans (thank you, Mr. Sherman) but overcame a deficit to make it to OT and win? Remember we nearly chocked one out at home to the crappy Titans (yeah, the Titans) when Hauschka got hurt and Ryan tried a FG that was returned for a TD? Remember when the winless BUX came into our house and had a 21 - 0 lead (or something) before we stepped it into gear and won in OT? We lost to the Colts, we lost to the Niners, and we lost to the Cards in one of RW's worst games ever. Had any of those almost12 losses been a loss, SF would have had the #1 seed and who knows. Every game we lost that year was winnable. Every game we won was "losable" - all this to say while we fans may sometimes take our team's success for granted, I don't think they do....and I don't think we will see RW have another outing like the one last Sunday.... at least not tis year.
Uppercut wrote:many on sports radio shows are having euphoria over the Raiders O-Line? I was not watching close but how did they build that up so fast? Guess they had the wallet out.
HumanCockroach wrote:Anyone missing Okung haven't watched him play this year... Just saying..
Hawk Sista wrote:One does not have to have HFA to win the Lombardi.
In fact, outside of the last few years - they haven't. Since 2000 - only 5 top seeded teams have won in those 16 games. The average seed is 2.94 (really, 3rd). Since 1975, the top seed has won only 37% of the time. YES, it is clearly good to be the top seed. Each of our team's trips to the Super Bowl, we have had the top seed.
I am disappointed we lost. I saw it coming. I thought our record would be worse than it is right now given the o-line and RW's health. I still maintain that it is ALL out there in front of this talented team; I really believe it. There is NOTHING counting us out and I'm gonna keep on believing we make a big dent in these playoffs.
That said, there are some legit teams that I thought were benefitting an easy schedule or being opportunistic. I think the Skins, Cowboys, Bux, Falcons, maybe Lions are all legit threats in the NFC...maybe even the Saints if they get it going.
True, HFA is not a requirement for winning a Lombardi.
But in our case, it damn sure helps one helluva lot. The only three times we had HFA just happens to coincide with the only three times we've made it to the Super Bowl. That's not just some random coincidence.
HumanCockroach wrote:So does having officials in your back pocket ala the Pats, but ultimately, anyone can win any game on any given day. That's how the NFL works, and has always worked. I don't see a problem with Seattle "getting up" for a big game, and haven't seen that as a problem in Carrolls tenure, and I'd be hard pressed to find a "bigger" game save one, than an NFCCG on the road against self professed "America's team". You?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests