RiverDog wrote:Cam's side of the story is a little different, says he didn't pack a shirt and that they stayed out on the west coast for the whole week, complained about buying a shirt when you're 6'5", that he wore a turtle neck that wouldn't accommodate a tie.
I'm a lot more likely to believe Cbob's scenario than I am Cam's. There's no way that Rivera would have benched him if he thought that it was accidental or excusable. There has to be something else to the story, it had to be more flagrant than what Cam is claiming.
On the other side of the ledger, Russell Wilson, while at Wisconsin, once borrowed a dress shirt from a teammate because he wasn't expecting to have to do a post game locker room interview in front of the camera and didn't want to do it in his tee shirt.
Oly wrote:That said, I much prefer Pete's philosophy. As long as guys put the team first, let them be individuals. It's always struck me as paternalistic when a coach tells men who play a game for a living that they have a dress code for traveling. (And I say this as a guy who chooses to wear a tie to work every day even though very, very few of my colleagues do so.) The rule is there, so it has to be followed, but I think the rule is stupid.
c_hawkbob wrote:I understand (Fox sports radio as source) that wearing a tie while traveling is an ownership rule, not a Rivera rule.
RiverDog wrote:[
It might not have been Rivera's rule, but it was still his decision to bench him.
Hawktawk wrote:RD what is your opinion other than being amazed it happened? Do you agree with coach Riveras decision?
My friend Dale and I were having a nightcap at edgewater and encountered some Carolina fans.
They didn't say much about the benching other than it probably wasn't too smart having the backup throwing on the first play of the game.
To that I would agree.
Hawktawk wrote:"As far as the rule itself goes, it sounds kinda silly to be requiring players to wear ties in this day and age.
As far as having the backup start out the game with a pass play, I see no problem with it. The backup is Derek Anderson, a 10 year veteran that's thrown a lot of passes in the NFL. That INT was a safe pass that bounced off the receiver's hands. You can't blame him."
Maybe it looked better on TV than live but the throw looked a bit low and hot for an underneath throw to a fullback.
Regardless the results were horrible and set the tone for the game.
And that's on Newton whether he accepts it or not which he does not....
Oly wrote:That said, I much prefer Pete's philosophy. As long as guys put the team first, let them be individuals. It's always struck me as paternalistic when a coach tells men who play a game for a living that they have a dress code for traveling. (And I say this as a guy who chooses to wear a tie to work every day even though very, very few of my colleagues do so.) The rule is there, so it has to be followed, but I think the rule is stupid.
RiverDog wrote:Pete has rules, too. Here's Richard Sherman's take on Cam and the benching over the no tie thing:
http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/ric ... spartanntp
RiverDog wrote:Pete has rules, too. Here's Richard Sherman's take on Cam and the benching over the no tie thing:
http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/ric ... spartanntp
Oly wrote:Sherman's comments seems close to what several of us have been saying here. The benching was necessary because the rule is there, but Pete wouldn't have a rule like that. I didn't mean to suggest Pete doesn't have rules--obviously he does--it's just that his rules give a ton of freedom for guys to still be individuals, certainly more freedom than Rivera seems to have.
Heard on the radio this morning that Rivera talked to Cam *the night before* and told him if he didn't wear a tie he'd sit him the first series.
Then dummy shows up the next day with no tie.
Either no respect for Rivera or too stupid to dress by the team's rules.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests