The POPE wrote:You made no mention of the catches the receivers did make to help Rus pile up those stats. He played well but he didn’t do it all on his own. The defense played poorly, but also came away with 3 picks, just enough to help seal the deal. the end result is the total of the whole, not just one. When I watch a game I watch the Seahawks...not just Russell. Remember, worshiping false gods is a sin. A matter of fact it is the #1 commandment. See you in the confessional.
The Pope
Aseahawkfan wrote:Russell's a bad man.
Defense did score 6 points. For all Russell did, we don't win without Earls' pick six. Receivers did step up today, while the RBs were stepped on.
Anthony wrote:LOL it always amazes me how if the defense plays well and we win it does not matter what the offense does we won by Defense, or if a defensive player plays well its all about him, but when its the offense and specifically Wilson we have to downplay it. Sure glad the players see it for what it is as they all come have out and said RW carried the team. At least they appreciate him. There is a difference between making a play and carrying the team. ET made a play, Rw carried the team.
Aseahawkfan wrote:
As Russell would tell you, this is a team game. He's not throwing to himself. No player carries the team or wins alone in football or any team sport. Period.
Russell had a great day. No one denies it. You can't seem to accept when he has bad days. You make excuse after excuse after excuse.
Anthony wrote:hmm and yet I was saying how he missed 2 wide open guys last week, meanwhile you are still double talking, so if this is team game when he plays great, then it must be when he plays bad, yet you only say it when he plays well hmm.
Seahawks4Ever wrote:Tony; I believe, unless I am mistaken, that you were pointing out that RW is an elite QB whereas most of the pundits don't put him into the same category as Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, or Drew Brees. They will of course now search to find that one or two that do ignoring the word "most". Just keep pointing out their hypocrisy, it drives them nuts. Wait for it, wait for it, wait for it, for their next act they will claim we are one in the same...
It is sad that they feel the need to bully others, maybe they do it in order to validate themselves.
Seahawks4Ever wrote:Tony; I believe, unless I am mistaken, that you were pointing out that RW is an elite QB whereas most of the pundits don't put him into the same category as Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, or Drew Brees. They will of course now search to find that one or two that do ignoring the word "most". Just keep pointing out their hypocrisy, it drives them nuts. Wait for it, wait for it, wait for it, for their next act they will claim we are one in the same...
It is sad that they feel the need to bully others, maybe they do it in order to validate themselves.
Aseahawkfan wrote:
I rarely say anything bad about Russell Wilson. Russell Wilson is a stud.
You're so psychotic about supporting him that you take anything you deem even slightly critical of Wilson and start repetitively posting across several different forums. It's pretty nutty.
Aseahawkfan wrote:
What rich hypocrisy that last statement.
NorthHawk wrote:That win was Russell Wilson, nobody else.
The Defense had one of, if not its worst day in the last 5 years and the Offense couldn't run the ball.
Consider Wilson threw for 450+ yards and the team could only muster 33 yards running. Oh yeah, Wilson ran for 31 of those rushing yards, so in reality the Offense ran for 2 net yards.
Wilson was the Offense on Sunday, even if he did make some mistakes.
Another observation is that the pass blocking is better than the run blocking.
It doesn't usually work that way, but it has to be fixed. We can't consistently win with 2 yards by our RB's.
It makes you wonder why we let Alex Collins go as he's leading the league in rushing average and making some real good plays for the Ravens.
I guess it's just another odd evaluation on the Offensive side of the ball.
RiverDog wrote:Yea, it will be a cold day in hell when Anthony makes a complete post that includes the negative parts of Russell's game and/or highlight efforts made by our receivers or OL (which gave him an above average amount of time) to go along with his usual blowing of smoke up Russell's hind end.
Russell played a great game yesterday, statistically the best of his career, but to be fair, he nearly lost it for us when he threw a very ill advised pick late in the 4th quarter, and either through instruction from Bevell or his own decision making, had lots of opportunities to keep the ball and make some substantial yardage off the read option, perhaps open things up for our running backs.
But I'm not complaining, as IMO Russell's negatives were far outweighed by his positives.
obiken wrote:I think RW is a great QB, he's our guy. However, Watson will be the Michael Jordan of the NFL.
obiken wrote:I think RW is a great QB, he's our guy. However, Watson will be the Michael Jordan of the NFL.
RiverDog wrote:
And he seems to be a great guy as well. He donated his first ever paycheck to hurricane relief, and in doing so, instantly became my favorite non Seahawk player, and yes, he played very well yesterday, especially when you consider he was going up against the best defense in the league in the toughest environment in the league.
But the Michael Jordan of the NFL? He's not going to acquire that status by throwing 3 interceptions.
obiken wrote:I think RW is a great QB, he's our guy. However, Watson will be the Michael Jordan of the NFL.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests