NorthHawk wrote:Many of these low level signings are of players that are the glue for positional areas. They aren't stars, but they get the job done at a salary that is beneficial relative to the Cap space available.
He might be a good signing for a year and maybe more if he's up to it.
RiverDog wrote:It's an OK signing if all you are thinking about is 2018, but at 34 years old, this is not getting younger and building for the future.
Largent80 wrote:And spending 12 million on a 31 year old Suh is different how?
RiverDog wrote:Largent80"]And spending 12 million on a 31 year old Suh is different how?
Largent80 wrote:But you said it was just an "OK signing"..It's not just an ok signing, it gives us exactly what S. Richardson gave us and for 2 million instead of 8 or 12 that Suh wanted..
It doesn't matter that it is a 1 year deal. How many 1 year deals did the Hawks have last year. It's a solid signing for our DL and CHEAP.
HumanCockroach wrote:Yup, smart, intelligent, BETTER move. Sinking that much of the cap for a downhill DT with so many other holes to fill, would have been moronic.... especially when you've signed a better pass rush, and run stuff, that's more disciplined, for 1/4 the damn cost.... you much name worship, not enough evaluation amongst fans.
HumanCockroach wrote:Well since three days after I said that, multiple other men paid to evaluate talent for NFL teams past and present saying the same exact thing, almost verbatim makes me ok with my evaluation skills, at least in regards to Suh...
RiverDog wrote:And now the Rams might be making a move to get their hands on Odell Beckham:
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/why- ... oth-teams/
RiverDog wrote:And now the Rams might be making a move to get their hands on Odell Beckham:
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/why- ... oth-teams/
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 14 guests