HawkShack.com

Was 2.65 so sorry not holding to long. https://mobile.twitter.com/JosinaAnders ... 1061270528

For one game, but after two games he's the 8th slowest (https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/stats/pass ... e-to-throw) and last year his 3.05 seconds was second worst in the league. Just because he was about league average for one game doesn't mean that he's doing a good job of getting rid of the ball quickly.

Oly wrote:For one game, but after two games he's the 8th slowest (https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/stats/pass ... e-to-throw) and last year his 3.05 seconds was second worst in the league. Just because he was about league average for one game doesn't mean that he's doing a good job of getting rid of the ball quickly.

You are missing the point, the point was some here was saying in this last game the sacks were because he was holding the ball to long all game. Obviously, that is in error as I just showed. So thanks for trying to hijack my point with info not relevant so you can push your narrative.

Anthony wrote:You are missing the point, the point was some here was saying in this last game the sacks were because he was holding the ball to long all game. Obviously, that is in error as I just showed. So thanks for trying to hijack my point with info not relevant so you can push your narrative.

Dude, calm down. I don't have a narrative to push. I rarely post and certainly have never gone to the mat to argue over any of this.

But here's the thing: you started a new thread and didn't provide any context that indicates you were talking specifically about whether "in this last game the sacks were because he was holding the ball to long all game." If you wanted to talk about what "some here were saying," then post in the thread where people are saying that. If you want to start a new thread, fine, but make your point clear, because a fresh thread with no context other than "time to throw" indicates that you're talking about how much time Wilson takes to throw.

I didn't miss the point because you never made it.

Oly wrote:
Dude, calm down. I don't have a narrative to push. I rarely post and certainly have never gone to the mat to argue over any of this.

But here's the thing: you started a new thread and didn't provide any context that indicates you were talking specifically about whether "in this last game the sacks were because he was holding the ball to long all game." If you wanted to talk about what "some here were saying," then post in the thread where people are saying that. If you want to start a new thread, fine, but make your point clear, because a fresh thread with no context other than "time to throw" indicates that you're talking about how much time Wilson takes to throw.

I didn't miss the point because you never made it.

Fair enough my apologies, this was in reference to last game and the narrative he was holding the ball to long

Yes.... Wilson, time to throw...

Anthony wrote:Fair enough my apologies, this was in reference to last game and the narrative he was holding the ball to long

No worries

You peeps watch baker last night?

Thats what a QB should be doing

Browns ahead of Sea now in standings LOL

Rambo2014 wrote:You peeps watch baker last night?

Thats what a QB should be doing

Browns ahead of Sea now in standings LOL

That is what happens when you actually put a system in for your QB instead of making your QB run a system that does not fit him or the players you have.