NorthHawk wrote:They can't spend $40+ Million on 3 Safties. Something has to give as we don't have any Cap space.
The best way is to jettison Adams as a post June 1st cut along with extending Diggs with a voidable year. They've put themselves in this mess and it's going to take a bold move to get out of it along with a couple more years of dead Cap space.
Maybe their plan is to draft a Safety and let that cost mitigate the dead cap hit and Diggs salary. What has been shown is Adams isn't a very good Safety or maybe fit here in Seattle. He's simply not worth the money that he's been given so best to cut ties now and move on.
c_hawkbob wrote:Well it looks like Neal is the odd safety out, we just rescinded his tender.
NorthHawk wrote:I’d rather they had cut Adams and kept the tender on Neal.
It’ll probably happen later because we’re still paying $40 Million or more for 3 Safeties even with Neal not on the books.
NorthHawk wrote:I’d rather they had cut Adams and kept the tender on Neal.
It’ll probably happen later because we’re still paying $40 Million or more for 3 Safeties even with Neal not on the books.
HawkSis wrote:When healthy (can hardly remember when he was), JA is a huge difference maker. HUGE. With the injuries that he's suffered, shoulders and the bad leg injury last year, I just don't know how much we can count on him. Still count me amongst the few that still appreciates this trade. It didn't work out, but only due to strange and atypical injuries (for a normally healthy DAWG). if he can return to even 3/4 of the dude he was his 1st season with us, it would be great. That's a pretty big IF, however.
NorthHawk wrote:There’s talk that we could see a lot of a 3-3-5 Defense this year. That might be the reason for signing Love to go with Diggs and Adams. If it happens it will be interesting to see what each’s responsibility is and how they would be used. In that scheme, Adams might be the weak link even if he can last for the year.
HawkSis wrote:When healthy (can hardly remember when he was), JA is a huge difference maker. HUGE. With the injuries that he's suffered, shoulders and the bad leg injury last year, I just don't know how much we can count on him. Still count me amongst the few that still appreciates this trade. It didn't work out, but only due to strange and atypical injuries (for a normally healthy DAWG). if he can return to even 3/4 of the dude he was his 1st season with us, it would be great. That's a pretty big IF, however.
Hawktawk wrote:I agree . Injuries are my main disappointment. He was playing well before hurt in 21 including improving coverage and 2 picks . In the opener he got hurt sacking Wilson . Seattle isn’t lucky in general . Put he and Penny on last years team . Yeah I know aunts and uncles and balls and the lack thereof. The move with Neal tells me they like love and they feel Adams will be ready . Not holding my breath on that .
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:It's fair to say he was overused in the QB pressure role. We had virtually zero effective options. Adams did have a really nice season as an all-rounder in 2018. 115 tackles, 1 int, 15 pd, 3.5 sacks. I don't know if that we'll ever happen again with him. Seattle needs a D-line that can keep him clean more often than not, but that still might not matter. He messed up his quad on a free run to Russel Wilson. I'm sure we all hope he can get on the field and stay there for the season while playing well, but I'm sure well share a healthy dose of skepticism on that actually happening.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:It's fair to say he was overused in the QB pressure role. We had virtually zero effective options. Adams did have a really nice season as an all-rounder in 2018. 115 tackles, 1 int, 15 pd, 3.5 sacks. I don't know if that we'll ever happen again with him. Seattle needs a D-line that can keep him clean more often than not, but that still might not matter. He messed up his quad on a free run to Russel Wilson. I'm sure we all hope he can get on the field and stay there for the season while playing well, but I'm sure well share a healthy dose of skepticism on that actually happening.
NorthHawk wrote:Exactly. We had zero options. It just points out the horrendous personnel management that happened during that 4 or 5 year stretch where every off season Pete said we had to improve the pass rush then did nothing about it in FA or the draft.
The year we traded the farm for Adams? We had Irvin and Mayowa as starting DE's. We don't have to look any farther than that to see how the pass rush was bungled.
His injury history points to increased possibility of drafting a Safety. Hopefully we can re-sign Neal, but that isn't a given and considering our Cap space issue, well we've discussed that before...
NorthHawk wrote:There’s talk that we could see a lot of a 3-3-5 Defense this year. That might be the reason for signing Love to go with Diggs and Adams. If it happens it will be interesting to see what each’s responsibility is and how they would be used. In that scheme, Adams might be the weak link even if he can last for the year.
NorthHawk wrote:At this point I think of Jerrick Reed as this years Ryan Neal. He's a bit smaller, but really competes. I don't know if he will end up on the team or ever starting, but from what I've read about him and how others who know him talk, he's of a similar mind set.
I think Adams is a lot of hot air. There's a reason the Jets wanted to rid themselves of him and even when healthy he hasn't been that good, so he really has to show something to prove he's worth his contract even discounting what we gave up for him.
tarlhawk wrote:Seems like I'm always lately defending Jamal in our posts...but really? The Jets wanted to rid themselves of a young all-pro they drafted #6 in the first round?? My take was it was all financial/ugly business end of it with Adams claiming he and their GM had a verbal agreement that never materialized...heated passion led to ET leaving us...so why is it hard to imagine heated passion led to Jamal being offered in a trade. Both Adams and Grahm came to our team as a result of contract wars between the players and their frustrated GM's...we have bad luck "swooping" in on tempting bounty!
tarlhawk wrote:Seems like I'm always lately defending Jamal in our posts...but really? The Jets wanted to rid themselves of a young all-pro they drafted #6 in the first round?? My take was it was all financial/ugly business end of it with Adams claiming he and their GM had a verbal agreement that never materialized...heated passion led to ET leaving us...so why is it hard to imagine heated passion led to Jamal being offered in a trade. Both Adams and Grahm came to our team as a result of contract wars between the players and their frustrated GM's...we have bad luck "swooping" in on tempting bounty!
Aseahawkfan wrote:We really haven't had luck doing this unless the cost was real low like the Marshawn trade.
Every high cost, high profile trade we made ended badly or mediocre. The best trades we've made have been low cost, high reward trades like Marshawn or Diggs. No one is complaining we traded for Diggs because he was a 5th round pick. We picked up Chris Clemons and a 4th round pick for Darryl Tapp. Some of John's early, low cost trades were amazing. These recent high cost trades have sucked and been some of the worst in Seattle history or at least not worth doing in retrospect.
RiverDog wrote:I'm with ASF on this one. Three expensive, high-profile trades, ie Percy Harvin, Jimmy Graham, and Jamal Adams, while we may argue over semantics like "bust", for one reason or another did not yield expected results. We've had much better luck with the under the radar type trades.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 95 guests