govandals wrote:Sure wish we knew what the other trade packages were. Maybe John had Philly and Washington in a bidding war that was greater than the Denver package. I'd bet Hurts was part of the Philly deal, that would have been real interesting. Let's not forget the year prior John had a deal in place to send Russ to the Bears but supposedly Pete nixed the deal. Considering Russ wanted to go to only Denver, it's amazing the capitol John got in return. The trade now reminds me of when Ken Griffey Jr want to go to Cincnnati only, I'd say the Hawks got way more value than the M's did.
Pardon me for quoting my old man again, but it sure seems to apply here:
"Don't look a gift horse in the mouth." I never did fully understand that saying, but it seems to mean not to find fault with unexpectedly good luck. It would be damn difficult to improve on the trade we made with Denver as it's shaping up as one of the most one-sided deals since the Herschel Walker trade some 35 years ago.
It's debatable whether or not Philly would have had as good of a season as they did with Russell Wilson as their QB, but I think it's fair to assume that they wouldn't have done the huge belly flop that the Broncos did last season. 5-12 is damn hard to beat. I'm happy as a lark with the way things turned out.
The Hawks had quite a bit of leverage in their trade negotiations with Denver. They had Russell under contract for 2 more years, not to mention the possibility of tagging him. In addition, it was clear that Russell had other teams he would have been willing to go to besides Denver, including the aforementioned Bears. But obviously, I agree that we got a very good deal.