MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:Carroll’s contract is guaranteed for 2024. Assuming a forced retirement or asking him to step down comes with a buyout. Not sure if that will carry any weight in the discussions.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:Carroll’s contract is guaranteed for 2024. Assuming a forced retirement or asking him to step down comes with a buyout. Not sure if that will carry any weight in the discussions.
NorthHawk wrote:I don't think one years salary will affect the decision. If he had 3 or 4 years then I suspect it would.
4XPIPS wrote:Pete isn't going anywhere, and he already stated he wants to coach in 2024, so buckle up for another above average year. There is a lot of chatter of what should happen vs what is reality, and the reality is that Pete is still here for next year and possibly the year after. Had we gone 7-10 then I would believe there is a small change Pete hangs it up. However, just speculating here but I believe Team Ops see this a building stone for the future after the way this year ended.
As for the defense, and I chattered about it back in the preseason where we couldn't stop the run, and we still can't. I believe Pete is trying his best, but I believe his best can't do it anymore. Had we lost the Cards game would could have been picking closer to 10th or 11th in the draft, but now we are further from that.
Roster desperately needs an overhaul as well as the coaching staff.
Agent 86 wrote:Here is a list of pending UFA's/RFA's the Seahawks have, who comes back and who do they let walk?
UFA's
L. Williams(DE)
M. Edwards (DE)
B. Wagner (ILB)
D. Bush (ILB)
J. Brooks (LB)
D. Lock (QB)
D. Dallas (RB) - not a fan of Deejay a
P. Haynes (G)
D. Lewis (G)
E. Brown (C)
C. Parkinson (TE)
D. Taylor (OLB) - RFA
M. Jackson (CB) - RFA
4XPIPS wrote:Pete isn't going anywhere, and he already stated he wants to coach in 2024, so buckle up for another above average year. There is a lot of chatter of what should happen vs what is reality, and the reality is that Pete is still here for next year and possibly the year after. Had we gone 7-10 then I would believe there is a small change Pete hangs it up. However, just speculating here but I believe Team Ops see this a building stone for the future after the way this year ended.
As for the defense, and I chattered about it back in the preseason where we couldn't stop the run, and we still can't. I believe Pete is trying his best, but I believe his best can't do it anymore. Had we lost the Cards game would could have been picking closer to 10th or 11th in the draft, but now we are further from that.
Roster desperately needs an overhaul as well as the coaching staff.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I just don't see how you can be ok with a defensive coach having a terrible defense this many years in a row. I don't see any accountability if you aren't looking at the results of the money spent (most on the defensive side of the ball), draft, and overall management of talent from coaching to trades to drafting and be ok with this type of defensive performance for going on five plus years and multiple coordinators. Ownership should not tolerate such a poor performance from a coach who is supposed to know defense as well as anyone in the league.
Unless you are talking specifically to one individual, you might consider substituting the word "anyone" for "you" in your first sentence. For a second, I thought that you were addressing me as my post was directly above yours.
I wanted Pete gone after last season. I hardly think that this season's results would alter that opinion.
Old but Slow wrote:Perhaps a letter campaign to Jody Allen to make a change could work. Nah. In the meantime, if there are not some major changes in the coaching staff (cough: coordinators), I may barf over all my furniture I have broken.
The team currently lacks any kind of imagination. While other teams are adapting to changes, the Seahawks stay the course. Unfortunately, the course seems to be toward the mid-Atlantic doldrums.
Pete loves being a head coach. He will continue as long as he is upright. It will take a move by management to remove him. John? Not likely, but it would be brilliant.
Old but Slow wrote:Perhaps a letter campaign to Jody Allen to make a change could work. Nah. In the meantime, if there are not some major changes in the coaching staff (cough: coordinators), I may barf over all my furniture I have broken.
The team currently lacks any kind of imagination. While other teams are adapting to changes, the Seahawks stay the course. Unfortunately, the course seems to be toward the mid-Atlantic doldrums.
Pete loves being a head coach. He will continue as long as he is upright. It will take a move by management to remove him. John? Not likely, but it would be brilliant.
NorthHawk wrote:Haven't we had 2 OCs and 3 DC's in the last 6 or 7 years? It seems to me that we've tried that and the single common denominator is Pete Carroll. He's the guy who stifles the Offense and he's the guy who keeps frittering away draft picks for questionable players or players that don't stay after being traded for.
I think we can only hope that Jody makes a change. Sadly I don't think she has it in her to do so.
NorthHawk wrote:Didn't Gruden, Siefert, and Reid come from Bill Walsh's tree along with Holmy?
NorthHawk wrote:But your point is essentially correct. In his latest tenure in the NFL, there haven't been any real successful HCs coming from Pete's staff. It actually might look like this is where Coordinators come to disappear.
Users browsing this forum: Stream Hawk and 71 guests