c_hawkbob wrote:Competitive intensity is exactly what I told my wife it was in real time. Would you have had Andy blow up back at him? Pulled him from the game?
c_hawkbob wrote:Competitive intensity is exactly what I told my wife it was in real time. Would you have had Andy blow up back at him? Pulled him from the game?
trents wrote:Yes! Besides disrespecting the leadership of the team, Kelce was saying, "Hey, I'm so good that if I had been in the game for that play I would have blocked him and it wouldn't have happened." Ego, ego. Sorry, I'm just old school. Kelce was doing his best Metcalf imitation today.
trents wrote:Andy Reed behaved like an adult and remained focused on the game. But he should have sat Kelce on the pines for the remainder of the quarter and then there should have been further repercussions decided in the offseason. There are some thing more important than winning a superbowl. Overlooking such a gross act of disrespect for authority will become a cancer in a team in the long run.
Aseahawkfan wrote:And Kelce was pretty key in that win. You remove him, you likely lose that game. That would be a worse breach of behavior than what Kelce did. You absolutely do not ruin people's chance at history.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests