burrrton wrote:Might be misinterpreting you, rott, but the Niners are the 5th-seed, and NO is 6th-seed. However, we don't play either of them unless they win next week.
That said, I might take NO at PHI, meaning we'd get a rematch with NO at home in 2 weeks.
HawkWow wrote:burrrton wrote:Might be misinterpreting you, rott, but the Niners are the 5th-seed, and NO is 6th-seed. However, we don't play either of them unless they win next week.
That said, I might take NO at PHI, meaning we'd get a rematch with NO at home in 2 weeks.
Someone just TMed me saying the Pack is the 6th seed. I've been celebrating by huffing paint and sniffing glue. You can only imagine my confusion.
rottweiler wrote:HawkWow wrote:burrrton wrote:Might be misinterpreting you, rott, but the Niners are the 5th-seed, and NO is 6th-seed. However, we don't play either of them unless they win next week.
That said, I might take NO at PHI, meaning we'd get a rematch with NO at home in 2 weeks.
Someone just TMed me saying the Pack is the 6th seed. I've been celebrating by huffing paint and sniffing glue. You can only imagine my confusion.
That was comic GOLD, bro!!!
RiverDog wrote:EDIT: So Packer contact calls and says SF @ GB and N.O plays (I assume) the Eagles. Winner of GB/SF to Seattle. Is this right? Damn...wish I'd seen that Packer ending after hearing it described. Too bad Harvin isn't the man Rodgers or Cobb is.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests