RiverDog wrote:I disagree completely. Even if you take a vaccine with a 95% efficacy as has been reported does not prevent you from acquiring the virus. There is still a 5% chance that you will get sick from it and become a spreader. The more people that get vaccinated, the less probability for that 1 out of 20 individual will pass it to someone else. The virus cannot find a host and dies on the vine. That's how we eradicated polio, through a very aggressive vaccination program.
Please point to me in the Constitution where it is that you have a right to refuse taking a vaccine? How is the government able to dodge those rights for those serving in the military? Did they sign them away during their enlistment? If you are convicted of a crime, do you lose your right to refuse a vaccine?
If you have ever drank water out of a tap or a drinking fountain, then someone has put chlorine and perhaps fluoride into your body without your knowing or approving of it. I see no difference between that and making a vaccine mandatory.
I wouldn't propose to make taking the vaccine mandatory forever, perhaps sunset it after 2 years. Once the crisis has past, when hospitals get back to normal, when we've developed more effective measures to treat those infected with it, then I would be OK doing away with the mandatory part. Extraordinary times require extraordinary measures.
RiverDog wrote:Oh, come off it! There's not a snowball's chance in hell of that happening.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Our Constitution supports individual liberty. That includes a right not to inject something into my body.
I-5 wrote:I guess we can be assured, the emergency meeting between the Michigan GOP leaders in Washington DC at Trump's request is about Covid-19, not the election, according to the White House. Anyone interested in buying a bridge from me?
https://www.freep.com/story/news/politi ... 357607002/
RiverDog wrote:So how is it that the government can treat our drinking water with chlorine and fluoride? What's the difference between ingesting something through your mouth that the government has put in your drinking water and poking you with a needle? How is it that Cbob can be given vaccinations he did not consent to simply because he volunteered to serve his country? How can our public schools require that any student in attendance has to have been vaccinated against polio and small pox as I was?
But even after a personal invitation to the White House by the president, the state’s top two GOP lawmakers notably did not endorse his (Trump's) baseless claims of widespread fraud in the state and instead said they used the meeting to press Trump for more coronavirus relief funds.
“We have not yet been made aware of any information that would change the outcome of the election in Michigan,” Shirkey and Chatfield said in their joint statement.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Because joining the military is voluntary. You can choose not to join the military and sign away your Constitutional rights. Just like you sign away your ability to support a particular candidate publically and do a lot of things when you join the military. Because drinking tap water is voluntary. You can buy bottled water. You can build a well. You can pay for an alternate water system. A lot of people avoid tap water and buy water specifically without chlorine or fluoride.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Look, before we go off on any more tangents, I want you to know I am not anti-vaccine. I want this vaccine to work. I want people to adopt it and use it. I will even use it myself once it is clear we have enough for everyone if the cases aren't dropping and we're out of the woods. I read up on how to manage my immune system and have had this COVID19 managing my way through it. I know my immune system can handle it if I do what I know to do to recover from sickness and I won't take vaccine from people who are higher risk.
That being said a government mandate would slow adoption of the vaccine, not improve it. It would immediately start a legal and political war in the nation that would cause a huge release of information by lawyers fighting against the vaccine mandate that would undermine it. It might slow adoption by months or years if mandated. That would suck.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I don't mean to get a little pissy with you, but I'm working a lot of lately and been on edge from this environment. I know you don't support government tyranny and you just hate and fear this whole situation with a daughter in healthcare and a wife with underlying issues. Don't worry, it's going to be adopted without a mandate as fast as they can produce it. They'll surely be some grousing from the usual suspects, but even they will eventually take it if the data continues to be good and things re-open. People want life to return to normal and if this vaccine offers that, they'll be waiting in lines to get the vaccine.
c_hawkbob wrote:Having failed does not not mean the idea wasn't pitched to them.
c_hawkbob wrote:I found it funny as hell that at the last moment he tried to claim that he summoned them to the Whitehouse to discuss Covid 19.
I found it funny as hell that at the last moment he tried to claim that he summoned them to the Whitehouse to discuss Covid 19.
Hawktawk wrote:I'm just afraid when he's exhausted it all the bombs will start flying and who is gonna stop him. The man is desperate and crazy.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Trump is ridiculous. Because of this narcissistic idiot I have to watch this election play out until January. Hopefully once December 14th goes and they haven't seeded the electoral college with faithless electors, he will finally accept he has lost. But who knows with this total selfish, ridiculous, narcissistic idiot.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I am starting to reach much higher levels of hate for Trump than I have had previously. He is really starting to piss me off. Am I really going to have purchase a weapon and prepare for a fight because this idiot can't accept he lost an election? For real? This narcissistic scumbag is so unable to accept losing he is trying to pull every scumbag, dictator like option to retake the election and expecting everyone to go along with it?
Aseahawkfan wrote:I had better see the GOP start stepping up after December 14th to send the message to Trump that the Republican Party isn't planning to support this scumbag and tear apart the nation during a global pandemic because this dumb mfer's ego can't take an election loss.
Normally I wouldn't post the Huff Post, but this is them reposting Trump's idiot tweets. I am really starting to hate Trump.
RiverDog wrote:Day by day, as Trump's legal challenges are exhausted, more and more Republicans are jumping ship. The Michigan contingent he invited to the White House is a good example. One of his staunch supporters in Gov. Brian Kemp just certified Georgia's election. The end of the road is near.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Any GOP that don't fully turn against Trump once the December 14th vote occurs, they are just treasonous scum at that point.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Any GOP that don't fully turn against Trump once the December 14th vote occurs, they are just treasonous scum at that point.
RiverDog wrote:We need to quit throwing around the word "treason". Call it unAmerican or undemocratic but it's not treason unless we are at war.
But I do agree that the longer the R's hold out and don't acknowledge Joe Biden as the duly elected POTUS, the worse they look.
RiverDog wrote:We need to quit throwing around the word "treason". Call it unAmerican or undemocratic but it's not treason unless we are at war.
But I do agree that the longer the R's hold out and don't acknowledge Joe Biden as the duly elected POTUS, the worse they look.
RiverDog wrote:We need to quit throwing around the word "treason". Call it unAmerican or undemocratic but it's not treason unless we are at war.
But I do agree that the longer the R's hold out and don't acknowledge Joe Biden as the duly elected POTUS, the worse they look.
Aseahawkfan wrote:If undermining legal elections is not treasonous and threatening to rouse your followers into some kind of Civil War is not treasonous, then what do you call it? Explain to me a president who is not accepting the results of election, is pushing to undermine confidence in American elections, and is looking for ways to overturn a legal election up to and including seeding the electoral college with faithless electors? What do you call that then? He's just a sore loser?
Aseahawkfan wrote:It is done. Trump has finally come to his senses. The transition has been authorized. It is over. Good. Someone with some power forced this move or Trump realized what he was doing was causing his own base to turn on him. Either way it is done.
c_hawkbob wrote:Would have? It DID! It just would have continued to.
RiverDog wrote:I read an opinion piece out of the NYT which explains why I wasn't nearly as concerned that we would have anything less than a 'peaceful transition' than some of my friends were:
At times, a president can seem all-powerful, and Trump’s presidency had an especially consuming quality to it, for both his supporters and detractors. Even members of Congress, especially Republicans, liked to claim during the past four years that they were powerless to change Trump’s behavior.
But that’s not how the U.S. government really works. As Matt Glassman, a Georgetown University political scientist, has told me: “Presidents compete with numerous actors — Congress, the courts, interest groups, political appointees in the departments and agencies, and career civil servants — for influence over public policy. The president must rely on his informal ability to convince other political actors it is in their interest to go along with him, or at least not stand in his way.”
When a president fails to do so, he often ends up being powerless to act. And that’s what happened to Trump. Hundreds of local election officials refused to bend to him. Over the past few days, several congressional Republicans publicly told him that he needed to acknowledge reality. (Many other congressional Republicans were only mildly supportive of him, giving credence to his lies but doing nothing concrete to support his efforts to change the result.) Business groups — traditional Republican allies — also told him to begin the transition.
In the end, Trump did as they told him to do.
RiverDog wrote:I don't know if you can believe anything that Donald Trump says, but yesterday he committed to leaving office if the Electoral College votes him out:
President Donald Trump acknowledged for the first time Thursday that he would leave the White House if the Electoral College votes – as it will – to make Democrat Joe Biden the next president, but said it would be “very hard” to concede the contest.
“Certainly I will, and you know that,” Trump told reporters at the White House on Thursday when asked if he would leave the presidency once Biden is formally chosen by the electors. Taking questions from reporters for the first time since he lost the Nov. 3 election to Biden, Trump used the Thanksgiving appearance to level a new round of baseless claims about voting fraud, arguing without evidence that Republicans were “robbed.”
Though he indicated he would continue to fight the outcome in states such as Pennsylvania and Michigan, Trump's remarks were the first time he recognized the need for a peaceful handover of power. States must certify their votes before the Electoral College meets on Dec. 14 -- many already have -- and resolve all challenges to the outcome by Dec. 8.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 430438002/
The next red letter date is Dec. 8th, a week from next Tuesday, the "safe harbor" deadline after which all state certified election results are protected from legal challenge, followed by the actual Electoral Vote the following Monday, Dec. 14th.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Oh gee. How magnanimous of him to agree to leave once he is confirmed to have lost by the electoral college. Sarcasm as deep as The Grand Canyon should be noted.
He's waiting like myself and many Americans to see if Faithless Electors engage in some shenanigans that he can build on. Something I don't think any president previously has tried, but I haven't fully investigated. December 14th. About 2 and a half weeks.
c_hawkbob wrote:Now the Repubs are saying there IS NO "Safe Harbor" and are refusing to certify the election results ... still think it's nothing Riv? I mean, this was supposed to be the day wasn't it? All supposed to be over today?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/as-biden-pas ... 57668.html
c_hawkbob wrote:still think it's nothing Riv?
RiverDog wrote:Yup.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Hypothetically, what would you do if enough electors refused to vote or voted for Trump to prevent Biden from gaining enough electoral votes to win? Do you take up arms against the Trumpbots or do you let Trump steal the election?
Aseahawkfan wrote:Hypothetically, what would you do if enough electors refused to vote or voted for Trump to prevent Biden from gaining enough electoral votes to win? Do you take up arms against the Trumpbots or do you let Trump steal the election?
RiverDog wrote:It's silly to speculate on something like that, and I'm not going there with you. It's like asking me what I would do if a dinosaur killing meteor were about to strike the Earth, and it has about the same probability of happening.
c_hawkbob wrote:Like I said, it's just a whole different atmosphere down here. Your POV would be laughed at here.
c_hawkbob wrote:I sure hope you're right, but with each passing milestone he brushes off it's looking more and more like all these "you wait till inauguration day, it'll be Trump getting inaugurated" idiots I have to contend with at work and at the gym (yes, they're still open here) just might get their way.
Like I said, it's just a whole different atmosphere down here. Your POV would be laughed at here.
RiverDog wrote:It's silly to speculate on something like that, and I'm not going there with you. It's like asking me what I would do if a dinosaur killing meteor were about to strike the Earth, and it has about the same probability of happening.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests