Page 1 of 1

Making History at the Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 9:06 am
by Eaglehawk
This kid has balls.

http://www.99rise.org/media_center


The non violent revolution has begun, and its the kids that are finally waking up. Good, especially since working America is fast asleep. Maybe our young generation will be able to change things and restore at least some of our democracy.

My only fear is that the gvt sees this and accelerates plans for another false flag(this time radiological). And Americans cower in fear, and gvt promises to protect us, and we lose even more freedoms. Savvy and Monkey, you get my drift.

Re: Bursting the Supreme Court Bubble

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 10:08 am
by burrrton
...accelerates plans for another false flag


What was the last 'false flag', Eag?

Re: Making History at the Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:09 am
by Eaglehawk
Burr,

I have no idea, you tell me.My silly answer to a silly question. When you are ready to seriously tell me what you think, let me know Burr. ;)

Re: Making History at the Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:23 pm
by burrrton
I have no idea


Give Alex Jones a call, then.

Re: Making History at the Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 2:21 pm
by savvyman
burrrton wrote:
I have no idea


Give Alex Jones a call, then.



Sure - Can you post her number?


Image

Re: Making History at the Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:20 pm
by Eaglehawk
burrrton wrote:
I have no idea


Give Alex Jones a call, then.

Who is Alex Jones? ;) Never heard of the guy. Thanks for not answering my question bruh. That was nice of you. :roll:

Re: Making History at the Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 1:04 pm
by Seahawks4Ever
Any Supreme Court justice that agreed with the ruling that a corporation is the same as a human being should have been impeached and removed. But congress was already bought by the corporations so it didn't happen. Roberts says he sees no problem with either Pelosi or Boener from requesting 1 million or more money from a constituent, and he also says that he doesn't see why that would or could lead to corruption. Really? Is Roberts that naïve or is he just that corrupt? My guess he is that corrupt. I mean, if someone lays down that kind of money they are not going to do it if there is even a remote chance the politician they gave the money would vote against an issue they are for. I mean, lets say Boeing has something before a committee chaired by Patty Murray and they give her millions of dollars in campaign money (all the money she doesn't have to spend on her reelection she is free to put in to her pocket!) to be sure she will make sure that legislation will go Boeings way. How is that not corrupt? But, it happens every day in both political parties.

Re: Making History at the Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2014 11:02 am
by savvyman
Seahawks4Ever wrote:Any Supreme Court justice that agreed with the ruling that a corporation is the same as a human being should have been impeached and removed. But congress was already bought by the corporations so it didn't happen. Roberts says he sees no problem with either Pelosi or Boener from requesting 1 million or more money from a constituent, and he also says that he doesn't see why that would or could lead to corruption. Really? Is Roberts that naïve or is he just that corrupt? My guess he is that corrupt. I mean, if someone lays down that kind of money they are not going to do it if there is even a remote chance the politician they gave the money would vote against an issue they are for. I mean, lets say Boeing has something before a committee chaired by Patty Murray and they give her millions of dollars in campaign money (all the money she doesn't have to spend on her reelection she is free to put in to her pocket!) to be sure she will make sure that legislation will go Boeings way. How is that not corrupt? But, it happens every day in both political parties.



Yes I remember reading about this over a year ago and thinking how the entire country of the USA is being turned into a corporation and all citizens rights (such as free speech. privacy, protection from search and seizure, etc...) will be the same outside of their jobs as they are inside (i.e. none).

Now......Since Corporations are now considered "as people" (I am sure that they wanted to be considered as people only when it suits them) - should not the CEO and all the top GM executives be brought up on first degree criminal charges for the recent deaths of GM vehicle owners? Yeah right.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/04/general_motors_defective_ignition_switches_why_carmakers_cause_preventable.html?wpisrc=burger_bar


Cue for Burton to bring in his Tea Party - Fox news talking points memos.....

Re: Making History at the Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:30 am
by burrrton
Cue for Burton to bring in his Tea Party - Fox news talking points memos.....


LOL. Pot-decriminalization and SSM-supporting atheists make up a big part of the Tea Party/Fox News demographic in your caricature?

As for the "corporations are people" stuff, I'm reticent, so relax.

Re: Making History at the Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 7:04 am
by savvyman
burrrton wrote:
Cue for Burton to bring in his Tea Party - Fox news talking points memos.....


LOL. Pot-decriminalization and SSM-supporting atheists make up a big part of the Tea Party/Fox News demographic in your caricature?




Fair enough - My Bad - I did not realize that you were a pot smoking, married gay man traveling on the highway to hell via the atheist express lane.

I will refrain from making such generalized assumptions in the future.

Re: Making History at the Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:04 am
by burrrton
I did not realize that you were a pot smoking, married gay man traveling on the highway to hell via the atheist express lane.


Pot smoking? No.

Married? Yes.

Gay? No.

Going to h3ll? Not according to my beliefs, and I doubt any God would send me there anyway. I'm a heck of a guy!

Re: Making History at the Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 1:46 pm
by Eaglehawk
savvyman wrote:
burrrton wrote:
Cue for Burton to bring in his Tea Party - Fox news talking points memos.....


LOL. Pot-decriminalization and SSM-supporting atheists make up a big part of the Tea Party/Fox News demographic in your caricature?




Fair enough - My Bad - I did not realize that you were a pot smoking, married gay man traveling on the highway to hell via the atheist express lane.

I will refrain from making such generalized assumptions in the future.


classic!

Re: Making History at the Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 1:49 pm
by Eaglehawk
burrrton wrote:
I did not realize that you were a pot smoking, married gay man traveling on the highway to hell via the atheist express lane.


Pot smoking? No.

Married? Yes.

Gay? No.

Going to h3ll? Not according to my beliefs, and I doubt any God would send me there anyway. I'm a heck of a guy!

I think both you and Savvy are great folks and posters.

Going to hell? Now that one keeps me up at nights. (Maybe for just a minute or two, but just saying). :lol: :ugeek: