Hawktawk wrote:Did I read Asea say Trump isn’t “ physical “ enough to have raped her . He’s 6’3” 240 lbs. several other of his likely hundred or victims have described him as looming over them, towering . He raped her and was found liable by 12 peers of sexual battery . You good old boys make me throw up a little .
Donald has victims , not accusers . In most countries he would be in prison . As a former leader doing what he did and continues doing he might be facing a firing squad .
Evil man but some want to give him a little wiggle room . Well he didn’t “ rape “ her . If he put hands on her with the intent it’s the same thing . Just like a certain zit faced puke scotus trying to rip a swimsuit off a 14 year old girl .
I don’t believe every woman. I believe these ones 100 percent .
Aseahawkfan wrote:Yeah. I said Trumps' a weakling. His physical size is irrelevant. Man don't have it in him to physically pull off that kind of crap. He'd run from anyone trying to fight him and cry to his security. Never heard that dude fighting, lifting weights, doing anything physical in his life.
I have no idea if Trump was a weakling/chicken or not, but we're talking about 30 years ago when he was in his 40's. He outweighed his victim by close to 100 pounds and was about 6" taller, so he certainly had the physical capability to overpower the typical female of the accuser's height/weight. But I still am not convinced that he had intercourse with her. It was a department store dressing room, a very confined space, so they had to both be standing upright. He would have had to disrobe a struggling female, keep her from escaping while exposing himself, and get the point where he could penetrate her seems physically problematic. She and Trump would have had to experienced significant bruising, scratches, and torn clothing, none of which was presented as evidence. That doesn't mean that I'm sure that he didn't, but in my mind, it lowers it below the 50% more likely than not threshold.
Aseahawkfan wrote:No. He doesn't have victims. He has transactional relationships and opportunistic women trying to bleed him for cash and fame, just like he's had his entire life. That's why he dates models, supermodels, pornstars, and the like because he's into transactional relationships where he pays them or gives them a Hollywood opportunity or let's them mix with his rich friends. He's always been the typical rich guy using his money and influence to get women and crap he wants.
There's no reason why he can't have both victims and gold-digging women trying to bleed cash out of him. Besides, the sheer number of complaints lodged against him, as it was in DeShawn Watson's transgressions, is a strong indicator of a sexual predator. You can rationalize away a few accusers as gold diggers, but not 18. Add into the equation the proven fact that many women are extremely reluctant to come forward and file charges in sexual-related crimes and his own statements bragging about his conquests and behavior.
Aseahawkfan wrote:As far as who should be in jail in most nations, that's just rubbish. The political scandals in other nations are just as bad and politicians get away with just as much garbage if they are wealthy and powerful enough. It's just how it works. That's why Epstein had rich men from around the world coming to visit his island and enjoy his offerings as wealthy and powerful men used young women as prostitutes.
I agree. The United States is far from alone when it comes to rich and powerful men taking advantage of at-risk women. Take a look at Prince Andrew. I have no doubt that similar crimes are committed in places like China and Russia.
