Aseahawkfan wrote:Seems the stock market may be predicting a Republican win of both the House and the Senate. If Republicans win both the House and Senate, then Biden's agenda is all done and he's likely to be under investigation. Tax increases will be off the agenda and tax cuts likely back on as the Republicans do everything to make Biden look bad and take back the White House. I guess we'll find out in a few days.
RiverDog wrote:Yeah, I saw that, too. I'm heading to Vegas tomorrow, and although I don't plan on betting on the election results, it will be interesting to see what their line is.
Biden himself admits that if the R's re-take the House, that it's quite possible that he could be impeached. This country went over 200 years and had just one impeachment, and now there's the prospect that we'll have 4 in the past 25 years.
RiverDog wrote:The jobs report for November is out this morning, and it was a much stronger job market than expected with a healthy increase in job openings. Plus, wages are up, another indication that the jobs market is still red hot. That sounds like good news, but what it means is that people still have lots of money to spend, and that's going to cause demand and prices to remain high. Indeed, consumer savings are down, meaning that people are still spending in spite of high interest rates meant to discourage spending. Inflation is going to be with us for some time to come.
There was speculation that the Fed wouldn't hike interest rates the full 3/4 point maximum, that it had seen enough signs that inflation was cooling, but this jobs report might change their minds. The Fed meets again on 12/14.
Fortunately, in a rare act of bipartisanship, Congress and the POTUS agreed to end the potential railroad strike, which would have been a huge blow to the economy. Not exactly the act of a person that promised in his campaign to be "the most pro union President you've ever seen." But there won't be the same outrage that there once was when another POTUS said "Read my lips: No new taxes!" Biden will get a pass.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Layoffs are just starting. But it seems more like it will be a labor shift. I see prices dropping all over the place. Gas under 5 dollars a gallon in Washington State. The Housing market is cooling off substantially. Even the normal ground beef I buy has gone back to pre-Covid sale prices. Chicken breast is still up. Eggs and milk have come down quite a bit.
Fed is indicating it plans to slow pace of rate hikes and the next one is looking to be .50 rather than .75.
Definitely some mixed signals, but inflation seems to be coming down.
RiverDog wrote:The Fed has been raising interest rates for 9 months yet the job market remains as strong as it's ever been. I can't see anything that would suggest that things will change in the next few months. A labor shift, yes. But unemployment will remain where it has all along, around 3.5-4.0%. It doesn't matter where or how people get their money, the fact is that they are, and as long as they are making money, they will continue to spend it. I don't see prices coming down much if at all.
It's hard to gauge inflation by groceries and gas prices because they're too volatile. That's why they factor out those things out of the core inflation rate, the stat that most economists put their faith in to judge if inflation is under control or not. We'll have to wait another week or so for that information along with the consumer price index to be released to get a better idea what inflation is doing.
The housing market has cooled off and new car sales decreased 4% from the previous month, but that was to be expected as those industries are very interest rate sensitive.
Aseahawkfan wrote:You don't undo the damage done by nearly two years of stuffing stimulus and printing money in a year, so it won't change much in a few months. The process of lowering interest rates by reversing policy from a few years of the biggest economic stimulus in history doesn't get fixed in a few months or even a year. This is a multi-year process and I'm saying there are signs it is working and things are starting to come down. We're a year or more from anything like we were pre-stimulus and re-opening.
RiverDog wrote:I agree with most of that.
One of the problems in that jobs report is the rise in wages. They're up 5.1%, an increase in the 4.9% rise in October. That means that prices aren't likely to come down anytime soon as employers will have to raise prices to cover the added labor expense. It's the same vicious cycle from the 70's-80's. You get a good raise only to see it eaten up entirely by inflation. I'm not sure how this is all going to end since the economy would really have to tank in order to put a dent into employment and force people to quit spending.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Prices are coming down. You can see the gas prices coming way down. Wages will affect certain industries more than others. We'll get another inflation reading soon and see how fast it comes down. The Fed right now plans to slow rate increases, which means they must be seeing a serious drop in inflation.
I'm thinkin another year or two to get things under control with a new higher equilibrium point by which we judge the inflation rate. Some depends on if we get a real recession, but it's real hard to have a real recession with employment this strong.
RiverDog wrote:You can't use gas prices as an indicator for overall prices because they're too volatile. Same with grocery prices. They are necessities where demand doesn't change very much because people need to use them for their everyday life. They are not a good measure of overall inflation, at least not on a month-to-month basis.
“Core inflation is considered an indicator of underlying long-term inflation”— Paul Ebeling
Food and Fuel prices are exempt from this calculation because their prices can be too volatile or fluctuate wildly. Food and Fuel are necessary staples, meaning demand for them doesn’t change much even as prices rise.
For example, gasoline prices may rise with the price of Crude Oil, but you will still need to fill up the tank in order to drive your car. Similarly, you will not be pushing off buying your groceries just because prices are rising at the markets.
Also, Crude Oil, Nat Gas and gasoline are commodities traded on exchanges where traders can buy and sell them. Food too is traded including wheat, corn, beef and pork.
The speculation of energy and food commodities leads to volatility in their prices, causing wild swings in the inflation figures.
https://www.livetradingnews.com/what-is ... 11633.html
I could go on, but I'm sure that you get the point. But I do agree with you that it's going to be many months before we get this thing under control. That's one of the reasons why I'm pessimistic about Biden's re-election chances and hope to hell that Trump isn't his opponent in 2024. Whether it's fair or not, people blame the party in power for their economic woes, and it's quite possible, if not probable, that we'll be saddled by inflation and rising prices even by then.
RiverDog wrote:What you say is true for the long run. But you can't just drive by the gas pump and note that the prices have dropped and hence, inflation will drop because the main cost component, crude oil, is traded on the worldwide market and can fluctuate wildly while demand remains constant. Same with food. Coming from the potato industry, I understand how seasonal food costs can be, that they are much cheaper in the summer and fall during harvest when we can manufacture product direct from the field, get higher recoveries, and don't have to pay for storage, double handling, and product degradation during storage like we do with products we produce in April and May. The same is true with most other agricultural products. And like the article says, a lot of food products are traded as commodities where speculation can drive up prices.
Here's an article with a graph that shows why gas prices are not a good way to measure short term inflation:
The Federal Reserve carefully reviews and analyzes the available inflation measures to monitor how well it is achieving its price stability goal. One common way economists use inflation data is by looking at “core inflation,” which is generally defined as a chosen measure of inflation (e.g., the Consumer Price Index or CPI, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index or PCEPI, or the Gross Domestic Product Deflator) that excludes the more volatile categories of food and energy prices.
Why are food and energy prices typically more volatile than other prices?
To understand why the categories of food and energy are more sensitive to price changes, consider environmental factors that can ravage a year’s crops, or fluctuations in the oil supply from the OPEC cartel. Each is an example of a supply shock that may affect the prices for that product. However, although the prices of those goods may frequently increase or decrease at rapid rates, the price disturbances may not be related to a trend change in the economy’s overall price level. Instead, changes in food and energy prices often are more likely related to temporary factors that may reverse themselves later.
https://www.frbsf.org/education/publica ... -headline/
The graph in that article can explain better than I can why gas prices aren't used in core inflation calculations.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I understand why they take food and fuel out of core CPI, but investors watch it closely because food and fuel inflation lead to some of the biggest problems. You need to think about it in practical terms. If you have 10 bucks and you spend 5 bucks on food, gas, and housing (rent/mortgage), then you have 5 dollars to spend on other items like electronics, vacations, cable, football games, and the like. If your food, gas, and rent suddenly cost 7 bucks and your income stays 10 bucks, now you only have 3 dollars to spend on non-necessities.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Wages can rise at a rate relative to inflation and we'll be ok. If wages rise faster than inflation, then we're in a real golden spot for workers. If wages rise slower than inflation, then we're in a bad spot. So wages are a factor in inflation, but rising wages don't usually hurt as bad as stagnant wages with insane fuel and food inflation.
Aseahawkfan wrote:If oil triples like it did in the 70s, we are screwed. Can you imagine oil from 80 to 240 a barrel? Terrifying.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I been watching the oil prices, food, and housing for a while. Increased interest rates should reduce housing demand, though it might push more people into rentals increasing rents until more rental housing is built. I get the feeling that the government through zoning is pushing for more rental building as it allows a higher level of taxation and a smaller imprint on the landscape than a housing zoned block. There is some discussion that the 1% with the blessing of the government intend to turn America into a land of renters where they are the landlords. Given how slow government is to allow home building, I get the feeling that is partly the plan. People are going to have to push back to force the government to build more houses at a faster rate or allow more houses to be built. With interest rates high, going to be downward pressure on building since most home and property developers rely on loans. Then again the government may be planning for the mass death of the boomer generation which will free up a lot of housing and assets that must be absorbed.
Aseahawkfan wrote:We should see next year if we get a bad recession. Then we'll have some good info to talk about, RD.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Inflation dropped to 6 percent this reading absent food and energy. So continuing good signs of a slowdown. Interest rate increase likely .50 next boost.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests