c_hawkbob wrote:Absolutely a clean shoot. Idiot probably had a Bon Jovie "Blaze of Glory" soundtrack running through his head ... at least he got out of the car.
Hawktown wrote:http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/donald-trump-takes-on-federal-land-control/article/2579978
Donald trump talking out his ass again. BUT HE'S RIGHT!!!
Do your homework people!!! Know your constitution AND DEFEND IT FOR ALL!!! Don't assume just because they are "public officials" that they are in the right!!! Think FREELY!!!
RiverDog wrote:
Federal control of public lands in the west is a legitimate issue, but I see no Constitutional matters involved. If anything, it should be turned over to local control, ie under the jurisdiction of state or county governments, so that the citizens that live in those areas have more influence over the management of it. As an avid hunter and outdoorsman, I like the idea of having large areas of land open for the public to use.
"Alas for the Knight of the Woeful Countenance, the windmills prevailed"
Hawktown wrote:http://cspoa.org/we-support-sheriff-tom-rummel-press-release-cspoa-org/
Sorry RD and C-bob , I know you cannot stand this "KOOKY" nonsense but this is much bigger than most realize. Don't believe me? Maybe you'll listen to the CONSTITUTIONAL SHERIFFS.
I realize that this whole debacle "SEEMS" to be a bunch of BS to the regular Joe, but it has MUCH, MUCH more to do with keeping the authorities in line with the law and to quit abusing the people of this country, including physical, mental, financial harm and then some.
People need to do their homework. This is no joke.
RiverDog wrote:
I'm not sure who the "Constitutional Sheriffs" are, but I know a thing or two about the US Constitution and I don't see any violations in this current struggle that you've been harping on for the past couple of months. There is nothing in the Constitution that says the federal government can't own property, including but not limited to real estate.
I do sympathize with some of your agenda. I do think that the federal government controls way too much land, particularly out here in the west. IMO the public would be better served if at least the management of some of that property were to be given to the states or counties. But it is not a hot button issue with me as it is with you. IMO there's a lot more important things to worry about than a bunch of sagebrush, such as global terrorism, over population, the cost of health care, and so on, and so on.
Time to move on. Not only is this is my last post in this thread, it's my last visit to it. It's old news.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests