RiverDog wrote:Could it actually be that unemployment dropped for 80 straight months under Obama, and that people are actually working?
ITS ABOUT OUR VERY SURVIVAL.
So you're comfortable with the lunatic holding the nuclear football and having an irrational love affair with Putin and Russia then?
I'm trying to address your points, but quite frankly, it's difficult for me to sift them out through all the hyperbole that's strewn about in your posts.
Ain't nothing compared to the handoff Jimmy Carter gave to Ronald Reagan, or Herbert Hoover to FDR.
There's no way of telling who would have been elected had the election been determined by direct popular vote vs the electoral college.
burrrton wrote:[So you're comfortable with the lunatic holding the nuclear football and having an irrational love affair with Putin and Russia then?
I'm trying to address your points, but quite frankly, it's difficult for me to sift them out through all the hyperbole that's strewn about in your posts.
So now you're blaming the EC delegates?
burrrton wrote:"There's no way of telling who would have been elected had the election been determined by direct popular vote vs the electoral college."
This, plus the EC exists for valid reasons in a country with 50 united states. The tards who whine about it because their preferred candidate didn't win expose themselves as partisan ignoramuses. Gets old.
burrrton wrote:"EVERYBODY'S DUMB EXCEPT ME! By the way, what degree can I get at an electoral college??"
What I would like to see changed is to make the electoral college votes counted by congressional district rather than winner-take-all.
burrrton wrote:"What I would like to see changed is to make the electoral college votes counted by congressional district rather than winner-take-all."
Yeah, I've heard a lot of reasonable EC modifications suggested, and that's one of them.
c_hawkbob wrote:Blame the Dems for Trump?
Boy that's rich ... you guys never cease to amaze with your capacity for blaming everything on the the left. Like the freaking SNL Church Lady; just replace "satan" with "Democrats" ...
Sorry but Trump's on you. You guys started embracing the divisiveness and bigotry of the religious right and hate politics (with bombastic, facts be damned talk radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh) and now that you've got a bombastic facts be damned president you want to blame it on the left?
You can say this election was lost by the left for a variety of ailments of their own doing, but Rush, I mean Trump is all yours.
c_hawkbob wrote:Blame the Dems for Trump?
Boy that's rich ... you guys never cease to amaze with your capacity for blaming everything on the the left. Like the freaking SNL Church Lady; just replace "satan" with "Democrats" ...
Sorry but Trump's on you. You guys started embracing the divisiveness and bigotry of the religious right and hate politics (with bombastic, facts be damned talk radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh) and now that you've got a bombastic facts be damned president you want to blame it on the left?
You can say this election was lost by the left for a variety of ailments of their own doing, but Rush, I mean Trump is all yours.
What do you mean by a false choice?
burrrton wrote:
What do you mean what do I mean? It's as simple an informal fallacy as there is. Look it up, I guess.
NorthHawk wrote:It looks like there is some push back from Republicans growing and I think it will become more prevalent if Trump forces out Sessions.
What's already happened is the bill that limits the President's ability to soften measures against Russia as well as North Korea and Iran.
It's just one bill, but the near unanimity shows the Republicans in the House and Senate have some backbone and might just be getting fed up with his antics.
Hawktawk wrote:No its not a false choice Burrton.
Or, could it be that mid terms are approaching and they KNOW their jobs are being scrutinized now more than ever?
This election woke people up, and guys like Turtle Boy McConnell are on their way out thank Gawd.
Largent80 wrote:Hey guys. Sorry I've been an ass lately. A lot of pressure on me from all angles, and add health issues.
burrrton wrote:[
*sigh*
Yes, HT, it is. You presented two choices:
1. The end of the planet is nigh.
2. You're comfortable with Trump in the White House.
One can be 'not comfortable' with Trump in the WH while disagreeing the apocalypse has arrived. You created a false dilemma.
You make yourself sound like a crank doing that.
If that's a false choice in your mind I guess you just don't want to answer the question of whether you specifically feel safe with Trump as commander in chief forgetting all his other responsibilities so whatever.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests