RiverDog wrote:My first impression isn't good, either. Looks a little too Demonic. But it's better than the stoned seagull.
Oly wrote:I think that if you're going to turn the logo into a more totem-styled image, you need to return to the stoned seagull...or, as I prefer to think of it, the more authentic Native style of art . I don't think the new logo looks good this way.
That old Hawks logo is still my favorite, probably in all of sports.
RiverDog wrote:I understand how the first logo got its start, and as a rule, I wouldn't object to it if not for the fact that it's representing of a football team. It's not too dissimilar to Tampa Bay's original logo featuring the winking pirate. Rather than 11 men dressed in armor preparing to go into battle, it conjured up images of actors in a musical dancing around on a stage wearing leotards.
burrrton wrote:It looks like a chicken with hydrocephaly. My gawd.
burrrton wrote:It looks like a chicken with hydrocephaly. My gawd.
c_hawkbob wrote:
Feez wrote:I hope to one day refer to this time period as "remember when the Seahawks had that really stupid alternate logo for a week? "
EmeraldBullet wrote:Might be the only one here that likes it, but I do.
Irish Greg 2.0 wrote:Hate it.
Hey Seahawks, if you are looking for marketing ideas... bring back the classic uniform for throwbacks.
A quarter of our bandwagon fan base probably has no idea we used to wear silver helmets ...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 85 guests