Irish Greg 2.0 wrote:
Enough said that is from an expert who knows more than you and me combined
You need to pay attention - I discussed the Xs and Os aspect in an earlier post:
My comments:"By the way, it is not just the O line. Bevell's game plans make no sense. This offense has no identity... they talk about wanting to run the ball, but don't have the personnel to do it. Eddie Lacy makes no sense in this offense. I'd rather see Mike Davis on the team. Hopefully, Rawls comes back healthy (I know, I know) and has his burst back.
We have smallish, quick wide receivers. This offense needs to feature roll outs and quick throws. 7 step drops are a death knell.
Do they ever practice screen passes? The way this line turnstiles defenders through, screens should be an easy hit.
Where was Prosise in the passing game? Swings, angle routes... nowhere to be found in Bevell's same old, tired playbook. No innovation, no refreshing....the same plays every game, every season."
----------
There is a poster with the name "Anthony!" on Seahawks.Net that is an incredibly sensitive, overly-biased Wilson apologist. It just looks awfully suspicious that your name is Anthony and you seem to want to give Wilson a pass.[/quote]
So I will just address the last part, as I said I looked on that site and saw the person you are talking about, I actually agree I can see how you might think we are the same, but we are not as I would never be part of that site. I know too many who were and say it sucks and from what I have read I agree. FYI I am also not saying give him a pass, I am saying his culpability is next to last on the list. It's like saying you have 5 symptoms of a disease, 4 could kill you one is just a runny nose but you want to talk about a runny nose not the ones that can kill you. Makes no sense. My biggest issue with Rw right now is not ignoring Bevel and running what works.