Hawk Sista wrote:Hi there, Obi
The POPE wrote:Pretty weak call for offensive PI, cmon man
burrrton wrote:We have got to be the *worst* 'draw the D offsides' team in history.
Now let's see if our vaunted D can keep the Rams offense from ramming it up their butts.
c_hawkbob wrote:Wow. Gritty game.
Cooper Kupp coulda left us all with an entirely different taste in our mouths about it ...
Hawk Sista wrote:Good win. A win is a win. A win against a division rival who has bested us in even our best seasons (after roaring out to take the division lead this season) is like a double win. There are a lot of positives to take from this. I’m happy and proud.
burrrton wrote:Yeah, I'm not going to look the gift-horse in the mouth over this one. Not the most satisfying, but fretting can wait a few weeks after this.
Old but Slow wrote:This was a coaches win. Statistically, we lost. Defense and turnovers won this game. And the scheme that ran this game was effective.
It has been fashionable to blame coaches, but they deserve credit for this one.
Old but Slow wrote:This was a coaches win. Statistically, we lost. Defense and turnovers won this game. And the scheme that ran this game was effective.
It has been fashionable to blame coaches, but they deserve credit for this one.
Largent80 wrote:Winning by defense and turnovers is the way we won the entire year we won the super bowl (including the super bowl). I'm ecstatic about this win. Yeah we left points out there, but give credit to the way the Rams play defense anainst US.
Largent80 wrote:Actually we are not tied because we beat them. We own the top spot
How about Earl Thomas?...He saved the game although the dropped pass by Kupp was his man as he was trying to bait Goff and chose the wrong player to cover.
Largent80 wrote:Actually we are not tied because we beat them. We own the top spot
How about Earl Thomas?...He saved the game although the dropped pass by Kupp was his man as he was trying to bait Goff and chose the wrong player to cover.
RiverDog wrote:Owning the top spot in the division by virtue of a head-to-head result in early October is as irrelevant as setting the high temperature for the year in February.
c_hawkbob wrote:Nonsense. Owning the tiebreaker against the primary division foe is relevant no matter what time of year it is.
You've been around long enough to see division titles and playoff births won and lost on the strength of tiebreakers. Go ahead and point out that there's a lot of season left, and even that a division lead this early is not much to crow about (though far preferable to the alternative), but the head to head tie breaker is important no what time of year it is.
There are only 2 head to head games, getting the first one matters.
Users browsing this forum: 4XPIPS and 10 guests