Hawktawk wrote:It demonstrates the utter contempt China and Russia have for the POTUS. It’s a dangerous time
Hawtalk said: "It demonstrates the utter contempt China and Russia have for the POTUS. It’s a dangerous time"
Idahawkman said: "Get a grip. They had just as much contempt for Obama. Remember him telling Putin "cut it out"? Wow, how forceful he was...
Largent80 wrote:Look at the bright side. If Rump doesn't kill us all in the next 3 years, he's gone.
But as Steven Colbert said so accurately Trump is Putin’s expletive holder .
The only thing that I will say, and it's the same thing I've said about all incumbants, is that for them to get re-elected that the country has to have been doing quite well, and no one should hate him to the point that they're willing to sacrifice something like a healthy economy just to get him out of office.
burrrton wrote:I'm afraid to say it, but if we have another three years like the year we just had, I think he can *easily* be re-elected.
Now in rebuttal, you can do what Trump does and dismiss the polls as fake news.
Any of that concern you ?
burrrton wrote:LOL. Nah, I believe you and them.
You may be right about the approval rating being the better predictor. I guess I just think that approval rating won't stay there if we have another 3 years like we just had?
burrrton wrote:
A little- I just don't freak the F out, nor do I read "THIS IS THE MOST PERIL THIS UNIVERSE HAS BEEN IN SINCE THE BIG BANG!!!!!!11" into a few critiques of a dopey politician.
In short, he seems to be pretty much who I thought he was.
burrrton wrote:I'm afraid to say it, but if we have another three years like the year we just had, I think he can *easily* be re-elected.
RiverDog wrote:
Anytime an incumbent President's job approval rating drops below 45%, they're in deep trouble. Ford, Carter, and Bush 41 all had sub 45% approval ratings prior to their re-election bids. Trump's current average for his term is 38%. Now if the Dems go and nominate a reptile like they did the last time around, then you might be right. But easily re-elected? If he does get re-elected, it will be in another close election like the past one.
Now in rebuttal, you can do what Trump does and dismiss the polls as fake news.
He's just a fat, white rich, blowhard that doesnt give a effing f*** about YOU or Me.
idhawkman wrote:NOTE: There is a Rassmussen poll out that shows Trump's approval rating of 46% (Yes you read that correctly) and disapproval of 57% is one percent off from Obama's approval and disapproval of 47% and 56% respectively at the same point in his first year of office. Also NOTE: Obama didn't have the MSM, Alt Left, RHINO Never Trumpers and so much more against him every day. So for him to have sustained all of that rhetoric and to still be standing just one percentage point off of Obama's approval rating is an amazing feat in and of itself.
By the way, this is not the most dangerous time in the history of the world, that was probably the Cuban missle crisis, not this little tiff. "IF" we ever went to war against N. Korea, it would be over in less than a month and they wouldn't get a shot off toward our homeland. So rest easy tonight, Gen Maddis and Kelly are on the wall and all is well. Sleep safe tonight because they will not let a maniac on the other side of the globe disturb your snow globe world.
burrrton wrote:He's just a fat, white rich, blowhard that doesnt give a effing f*** about YOU or Me.
Sox-n-hawks wrote:Trump is quite the loudmouth, but I have to wonder what it would be like if we could hear conversations from each president through out history. Somewhere theres a hilarious phone recording of LBJ talking about his balls to a seamstress.
Not sure if sarcasm or serious because there was none of that in anything I said.
I just spoke the truth and it's the way most Americans feel whether you like it or not.
Largent80 wrote:I just spoke the truth and it's the way most Americans feel whether you like it or not.
Yeah I'm Archie bunker.
Largent80 wrote:Yeah I'm Archie bunker. What a bunch of ultra maroons.
I live in rural Texas and people here, in this red state can't stand him. I don't need a stat or poll to validate anything.
chris98251 wrote:LBJ was exactly what the stereo typed Texan was all about, both in mannerism and opinions and demeanor. They had a hell of a time keeping him out of trouble with how he spoke and acted. These days I don't think we would see a lot of difference between how he and Trump act if LBJ had Twitter and all the cameras on him the way it is today, where society can tune into almost anywhere.
I don't know who voted for Trump in the first place. I usually vote Republican and I didn't vote for him.
I have no idea what Trumper's think. I lost a lot of money believing polls the last election.
I wouldn't bet on Trump winning or losing since it's far too hard to call. Some people keep making it seem like Hilary's status caused her to lose and I don't buy it. She wasn't Obama, but the first female candidate with strong support from her party, the female vote, and the Clinton lovers that still exist should have made her a near shoe-in Also Trump beat highly established and politically powerful Republicans in the primaries backed by more money and grassroots than Trump with better names. Trump is a wild card. I don't care how many polls people pull out of their behinds to support him losing or winning, I wouldn't put any money on it. That's for sure.
Sorry for those that want to hate the man or think of him as a dolt that somehow got lucky and won the presidency. I don't buy any of that crap. Just sour grapes by those against him. I admire highly successful people that get what they want against all odds. It's one of the reasons I admire FDR and Obama, just to be sure it isn't along party lines. Some men just have such a will, drive, and ability to get what they want, it's hard not to admire it. I'd love to have that level of ambition and drive.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests