burrrton wrote:I read somewhere he blew a 0.03- he must have been smoking weed.
EmeraldBullet wrote:Accused of DUI. He only blew a 0.03. A conviction is not a sure thing.
burrrton wrote:If he was reasonably sauced I could see them charging with something, but at 0.03? That's called sober. Unless they found something else to attribute his "intoxication" to, he's off.
burrrton wrote:I read somewhere he blew a 0.03- he must have been smoking weed.
jshawaii22 wrote:Ahhh soooo... you win the prize today. He as much as admitted it the PD at the time. So, it's legal, but you can't smoke while driving or admit to have smoked ahead of driving. Kind of limits the fun.
chris98251 wrote:They now have a breathilizer for Pot as well, seen it on the news a while back. may not be binding yet but it can raise reasonable doubt which is all the cops need.
Rambo2014 wrote:Teams in legal Pot states like WA and CO are losing now cause they are high before, during, and after the games. Thats why you lose at home now and do better on the road unless you play the broncos
Stream Hawk wrote:Lane probably was stoned. They can do a simple swab of saliva to test for THC levels. In Washington State that was a sort of concession for its legalization victory in 2012. I was close to voting against it back then due to such a concession. Being stoned is simply in another ballpark than being drunk, especially when it comes to operating a motor vehicle. I am not even a smoker (any more at least), but believe that smoking pot should be legal with certain age restrictions.
The driving under the influence infraction should be a different sort of crime for being high vs. drunk. Not sure where I'm going with this; sort of wish I could go take a toke!
Rambo2014 wrote:Teams in legal Pot states like WA and CO are losing now cause they are high before, during, and after the games. Thats why you lose at home now and do better on the road unless you play the broncos
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests