Seahawks4Ever wrote:Jimmy G. WHAT A WASTE!!! Another Pete Carroll Failure-GET USED TO IT MORONS, all of you Petelovers have hitched your wagon to a LOSER.
Pete is MAD at Sherm 'cause Sherm CALLED OUT Bevell and by calling out Bevell he called out PETE the LOSER. Go Ahead, MARK MY WORDS, in a few seasons you WILL agree the Pete needs to go but by that time I will be LAUGHING at the REST of you LOSERS. Pete took a GREWAT TEAM and DESTROYED IT and youall call THAT competing??? FOOLS, a ship of FOOLS people! Pete is steering straight for an ICE BERG and you fools party on as if nothing is WRONG at the helm.
Aseahawkfan wrote:If that's what you call a loser, I hope Paul Allen continues to hire "losers."
Seahawks4Ever wrote:Jimmy G. WHAT A WASTE!!! Another Pete Carroll Failure-GET USED TO IT MORONS, all of you Petelovers have hitched your wagon to a LOSER.
Pete is MAD at Sherm 'cause Sherm CALLED OUT Bevell and by calling out Bevell he called out PETE the LOSER. Go Ahead, MARK MY WORDS, in a few seasons you WILL agree the Pete needs to go but by that time I will be LAUGHING at the REST of you LOSERS. Pete took a GREWAT TEAM and DESTROYED IT and youall call THAT competing??? FOOLS, a ship of FOOLS people! Pete is steering straight for an ICE BERG and you fools party on as if nothing is WRONG at the helm.
NorthHawk wrote:Pete has never produced a good Offense, though so it will be interesting to see if he can put together one that can provide balance to the team.
NorthHawk wrote:Pete has never produced a good Offense, though so it will be interesting to see if he can put together one that can provide balance to the team.
obiken wrote:Northhawk, I think Cbob and River will back me up that I think Pete is going to spend more money on the Offense now than on the Defense. I could be wrong.
Largent80 wrote:Sick of what????
Graham wasn't going to be a Seahawk. Everyone in the world knew this.
HumanCockroach wrote:Hopefully Seattle will now return to the offense that despite others claims, wasn't just good, but elite. No more limiting outside routes that allow Graham to own from hash to hash( Seattle was truly dangerous when Te' s were an ORGANIC option on offense, not a FOCAL point.... in fact, I pray they don't sign or draft ANY focal point receiver or TE. It isn't conducive to winning SBs, or elite offenses. Teams with the most success, don't HAVE focal points), a return to what it was that had many fooled into believing Wilson was on the cusp of dominance. Short to intermediate crossing routes with a mixture of scrambles and long shots down the field.... instead of the polar opposite of that.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Agreed. If you find a stud receiver in the draft, awesome. I wouldn't go out of my way to find one. Russell works fine with a good group. He can pass anywhere at any time. He doesn't need a focal point, just a very good group. I'd take a group of Doug Baldwins with a Zach Miller TE and a stud run game over an elite receiver or TE.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests