Largent80 wrote:So Suh me already.
c_hawkbob wrote:Fingers crossed!
NorthHawk wrote:I just heard Kirwan on NFLRadio and he was saying no way Suh dictates how much he makes this time and wouldn't spend $10m/year on him. He would spend maybe $7m.
Not that his opinion means a whole lot, but I thought it was interesting.
Suh's Dolphin Cap hit was something like $22m so no wonder they let him go.
Seahawks4Ever wrote:So, that's what it boils down to Seahawk fans so jaded that they now drool over the possibility of having that piece of excrement Suh on their team? Not my kind of fans. Bunch of sell outs if you ask me.
I once turned my back on the Sonics when they had lost their way. I walked away from the Tom Flores Seahawks with that idoit owner from Oakland who tried to move the team. I can wait until Paul Allen either comes to hi senses and fires Pete Carroll or he sells the team to someone else who fires Pete.
Pete Carroll is taking the Seahawks straight to MEDIOCRITY!!!!
MARK MY WORDS, Pete is a LOSER who once got lucky.
FOOLS!!!
NorthHawk wrote:The word is he will be released on Wednesday, but if he is just going for the biggest payday he can get, we will be out bid.
In our favor is he needs to go to a team that has strong leadership as he's not one himself and might be considered selfish, but he's a great player on Sunday so teams might consider their own locker rooms before making a big offer.
Zorn76 wrote:Not a fan of the guy, but if he keeps his screwball head on straight and comes cheap, he's worth a flyer.
obiken wrote:I dont know, maybe you and River are right but I have serious doubts about a guy that steps on peoples hands.
Largent80 wrote:Wow. Why even be a Seahawk fan?
c_hawkbob wrote:Suh had 7 penalties last year, Bennett had 12.
http://www.nflpenalties.com/position/de ... ?year=2017
trents wrote:Please, no! Not Suh. He's a penalty machine and an embarrassment to a team.
NorthHawk wrote:I think he's one of the few players available in FA that can legitimately collapse the pocket - or at least put a real strain on it.
He's often double teamed so that provides more opportunities for others as well.
HumanCockroach wrote:Maybe I'm the only one that misses when Seattle went cheap at D tackle, and believes you don't need to pay 12 to 15 million dollars a year for a run stuffer, seemed to work just fine... you know when they were competing for, and winning SBs.... you don't need dominance, you need someone to tie up the lineman, to let your pro bowl, all pro linebackers and safeties to make plays.... while Suh and Richardson serve that purpose, so does a LOT of players that are inexpensive and cheap.
Remember when Mebane was "to expensive" to keep? Now you got Seattle believing they have to overspend to get an Aaron Donald through the draft, trade or free agency, when all they really need is a heavy, active D tackle, and nothing else..
Largent80 wrote:I would say that the Hawks have done pretty well in the last couple drafts with Jones and Reed, that being said both got injured at different points of the season. Richardson was decent last year and wants about 14 to play per year, if we could get Suh for 10 it's a no brainer.
Bradford to AZ. Goff in LA, and Garrapolo in SF means we need to get great push up the middle this year to compete in our own division.
curmudgeon wrote:Minny clearing cap room. Richardson will become a Viking on 3/16/18.....
Suh is far more than a run stuffer. We were hoping Richardson would be more than a run stuffer, but it didn't work out. Suh can collapse the middle and pressure the QB. He's like an ideal for this type of defense. Pete's been looking for his stud interior rusher for ages, though it hasn't had much of an effect on the quality of our defense due to our insanely good secondary.
Aseahawkfan 645 Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am
Top
Re: Suh in Seattle
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests