Bucs/Packers game

Official Seahawks Forum, for the 12th man, by the 12th man.

Re: Bucs/Packers game

Postby obiken » Sun Feb 07, 2021 2:35 am

Aseahawkfan wrote:Brady is the total package. I'm not sure why it's getting argued. Championships combined with regular season and post-season performance is what forms the best. Brady has performed at a high level in every area of the game except rushing. He has the rings with the regular season stats and the insane longevity.

Not sure how else you would rate a QB other than that combination of rings and personal stats that put them at a level above everyone else.



I am not a Brady Hater ASHF, No doubt IF you think titles define greatness then he is numero Uno! I think teams win Championships. In the Salary Cap era, no one compares to Tommy.
obiken
Legacy
 
Posts: 3962
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:50 pm
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon 97070

Re: Bucs/Packers game

Postby NorthHawk » Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:22 am

So he's top 5 in some stats, top 30 in others, 7th in passer rating, and has done all of this across two decades of football with changing rules and is number one in Super Bowls won, NFC Conference Championships, and Super Bowls made.

So tell me, you estimate it, how many Super Bowls does Belichick win and get to without Brady? I want to hear your estimate. We literally have a massive number of comparisons of other extraordinary teams that couldn't even win 1 Super Bowl. As well as the crazy dynasties that dominated their era that did not equal Brady.

Yet somehow Brady was just the luckiest QB in history because he had the best teams and coaching? No other QBs had equally good teams and coaching over the years to be able to equal what he did? Chuck Knoll 20 years in Pitt? Tom Landry in Dallas? Bill Walsh in Frisco? But somehow it's just Brady's lucky teams that somehow won even though no one else has been able to replicate this with other supposedly better QBs? Or were they all just worse coaches than Belichick?

You can toss this thinking around all you want. Brady has done something unprecedented. And your "luck" or coaching or defense argument doesn't hold much water because plenty of players had extraordinary coaching, players, luck, and the like around them, but still couldn't get done what Brady got done.

No. You don't need to be number one in any QB category. Dan Fouts had the passing yards record for years. Not one Super Bowl. Troy Aikman barely rates as a QB, yet he's a Hall of Famer who was a great QB for his time. He knew how to lead.

That's Brady. He knows how to win and lead a team to a Super Bowl if you put quality pieces around him better than any QB in history. Most even amazing QBs can barely get it done even with far superior teams around them.

It's a weak argument on your part. I wish we had a magic machine because I'd bet money you take Rodgers or Peyton or Elway and put them with Belichick and the Patriots during the same period, they don't win as often as Brady. Brady has excellent regular and post-season stats. But what he seems to have more than the others is a knack for winning tight games and an absolutely never die attitude, never break, never give up drive to win. Patriots have literally never won a Super Bowl by big points. But the one thing they've always had that has put them over others more often than not is Tom's ability to take the lead and close games.

Anyway, it doesn't matter what you think. As far as the the NFL is concerned, Brady is the best to ever do it. He's untouchable in that position at this point. He's pretty much set the standard for QB greatness for future generations. You want to be the best, you gotta match Tom Brady. His stats and his championships.


I've always said Brady is a very good QB. There's no question and I give him his due. But he's not the best ever. The stats don't bear it out. For my money, there are a few QBs that are/were better and you mentioned them, namely Rodgers and
Manning for sure. QB's these days don't call their own plays, so we can't compare to those days, but that leaves us with only TD's, INT ratios, and TD/INT ratios plus some others. If he was the GOAT, he would lead in a number of those categories I listed above. He does not, but others are rated higher and Rodgers is the best ALL TIME in a couple of them and much nearer the top in others.

Winning championships is a team accomplishment, not a QB accomplishment. The QB gets the glory, but it's the team/coaches around him that make it work and give him the chance to be successful.
It IS luck for any player to land in the perfect situation for him to achieve at the highest level. It was luck that teams passed on him 198 times for him to be selected by NE. That's not planning or skill, it's BS luck and nothing else.
He's had great Defenses that bailed him out and/or set him up with a short field for the team to win throughout his career and they won SB's because of them. It was his good luck that they beat us. Luck that our OC called a bonehead play when
we were on the goal line. It wasn't Brady who won it, but the Defense that did.
The old saying the Defense wins championships is true to a large degree and Brady has been the beneficiary of playing on teams with good Defenses most of his career.
NorthHawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 11453
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:57 am

Re: Bucs/Packers game

Postby Aseahawkfan » Sun Feb 07, 2021 4:53 pm

obiken wrote:I am not a Brady Hater ASHF, No doubt IF you think titles define greatness then he is numero Uno! I think teams win Championships. In the Salary Cap era, no one compares to Tommy.


Teams do win. But everything around Brady changed but Belichick. They kept on going to Super Bowls and winning. No one really admits that Brady changed WRs, RBs, TEs, O-lines, and everything else multiple times, yet he still went back to the Super Bowl. That is pretty rare to have everything around you change multiple times and keep getting back and winning. They changed defenses multiple times.

At first you're wondering if it is Belichick, but then Brady goes to Tampa Bay. He's the main change. Now they're going to the Super Bowl.

When a guy is the main component of multiple Super Bowls with everything changing around him including multiple players, then he even goes to a new team and does it, at that point you have to give the man his due. Brady for whatever reason is the best combination of traits to play QB in NFL history. He's not the single best at any particular thing. He's not much of an athlete. But his combination of traits has led to unprecedented success at QB in an era where the next closest QB has what 2 Super Bowls and been to 3? Even taking into account the non-salary cap era, the next best guy has 4 Super Bowls?

The entire historical Cowboys and Pittsburgh Franchises have been to the Super Bowl 9 or 10 times in their history? Literally, the two best championship franchises in NFL history have been equaled by single QB, mostly with New England.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/784497/teams-ranked-by-super-bowl-appearances-in-nfl-history/

Brady's Super Bowl appearances and wins are literally one of the most insane stats in NFL history. It may be one of the most insane stats in sports history given the way football works. Brady's ability to lead a team to a Super Bowl and win is an unprecedented feat in NFL history. It was supposed to not be possible in the salary cap era.

Salary cap started in 1994, 26 years ago. These dynasties weren't supposed to happen.

But Brady has done what no one thought could ever be done with rotating teams, players, and now coach. It's pretty crazy.

Never in a million years did I think I would see dominance like this in the NFL, especially in the salary cap era.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8326
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Bucs/Packers game

Postby Aseahawkfan » Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:03 pm

7 of 10 Super Bowls. Unreal. 43 years old. Sickening.

Was the Tampa defense really this good? I don't recall them being this good.

And now everyone is saying Gronk at his age is better than Kelce. Nothing to do with the guy throwing to him of course.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8326
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Bucs/Packers game

Postby obiken » Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:28 pm

Aseahawkfan wrote:7 of 10 Super Bowls. Unreal. 43 years old. Sickening.

Was the Tampa defense really this good? I don't recall them being this good.

And now everyone is saying Gronk at his age is better than Kelce. Nothing to do with the guy throwing to him of course.


It goes deeper than that as you know, Brown couldnt play for Tomlin, or Carroll, his career was done~ Tommy rehabilitated it!
obiken
Legacy
 
Posts: 3962
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:50 pm
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon 97070

Re: Bucs/Packers game

Postby Aseahawkfan » Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:32 pm

obiken wrote:It goes deeper than that as you know, Brown couldnt play for Tomlin, or Carroll, his career was done~ Tommy rehabilitated it!


Obi, you been watching football for like 4 decades now or more? You ever seen someone do this.

I have been watching football for nearly 4 decades. I thought Joe Montana was the best playoff and Super Bowl QB I'd ever seen. And Elway was probably the best athlete playing QB I'd ever seen. Now Brady has won 7 of 10 Super Bowls. I don't even know what to think about it. It's so freakish in the NFL where your career can end in a heartbeat from too many hits. He even took a year off due to a torn ACL. Brady took a beating from the Giants in their two Super Bowls. Somehow this dude just kept coming back. Now he's 7 of 10 winning one at 43 with a 130 QB rating.

It doesn't even seem real.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8326
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Bucs/Packers game

Postby mykc14 » Sun Feb 07, 2021 10:13 pm

This was a very similar game to our own win vs. the Broncos the only real differences were defensive and return TD’s for the Hawks. Other than those the games were very similar. If you look at almost every important stat they line-up with our SB win. Of course Brady won the MVP in this one but Russ’ stats were similar to Brady’s.
mykc14
Legacy
 
Posts: 2759
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 8:45 am

Re: Bucs/Packers game

Postby RiverDog » Mon Feb 08, 2021 4:29 am

mykc14 wrote:This was a very similar game to our own win vs. the Broncos the only real differences were defensive and return TD’s for the Hawks. Other than those the games were very similar. If you look at almost every important stat they line-up with our SB win. Of course Brady won the MVP in this one but Russ’ stats were similar to Brady’s.


I didn't get that kind of feeling at all. In SB 48, we were up 29-0 at few seconds into the 2nd half. The score at the same point yesterday was 21-6. Being down two TD's isn't in the same realm as a 29-0 whitewash. We were up 36-0 before the Broncos scored their only TD enroute to a final score of 43-8.

The stat line yesterday was closer than you would have thought. The Chiefs actually outgained the Bucs in total yardage, 350-340 and ran more offensive plays, 69-63. 3rd/4th down efficiency was about the same, and factor out the penalties and the first downs were almost the same. The difference was a 2-0 turnover margin, QB efficiency, and of course the penalties.

I didn't think that KC ran the ball nearly enough, especially in the first half. They ended up with just 17 rushing attempts for just 107 yards with 5 of those carries and 33 yards coming from Mahomes scrambles. Tampa Bay, on the other hand, got 150 yards rushing out of their two RB's.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Bucs/Packers game

Postby Uppercut » Mon Feb 08, 2021 11:05 am

I bet Pete nearly had an orgasm watching the Bucs play and how they did it.
Uppercut
Legacy
 
Posts: 594
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 6:23 pm

Re: Bucs/Packers game

Postby NorthHawk » Mon Feb 08, 2021 11:17 am

No kidding. It probably reinforced his perception of a stifling Defense wins games, but just maybe he also appreciated that the Tampa Offense was allowed to wind it up to create breathing room.
I'm surprised Lavonte David didn't win MVP. On a dominating Defense he stood out with something like 12 tackles, a sack, and an interception. He played like Wags this year and may be up for
a good pay raise as his contract is up.
NorthHawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 11453
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:57 am

Previous

Return to Seahawks Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests

cron