River Dog wrote:
I'm not sure why it would be surprising that Russ signed before Rodgers. The Giants obviously felt that they were the odd man out in the Aaron Rodgers sweepstakes.
They're a rebuilding team that isn't expected to contend, and Rodgers will likely end up with either the Vikings or Steelers, both playoff teams from a year ago.
The deal is pretty paltry as far as NFL QB's goes and significantly lower than the $20-30M Russ was looking for. It's a one-year deal is worth $10.5m with incentives that could push it to $21M.
Then it poses the question. Knowing full well this probably would never happen, but the pieces were there to make it happen. Bear with me.. why didn't the Hawks just sign Russell to $21m per year, and use him as a bridge for the future? I believe most of the beef was between Pete and him, and John was the guy who pounded the table to draft him after we had signed Matt Flynn.
If we weren't a contender, and signing Darnold doesn't make us a contender immediately and he appears to be the bridge for the future..... then why didn't we just do it with Russ? If one can see that Russ and Darnold will probably give you the same output next season, why not save the money and make it a homecoming of sorts. Most of the locker room has flipped since then, or did he burn the bridge that bad that reunion would have been off the table? Clearly Russ has to realize by now he isn't close to the elite QB he once was, but if given the magic wand and I was given the choice between Russ for $21 m per year vs Darnold round $30 m per year, hmmm I may go with Russ, but that's me.