Russell Wilson

Official Seahawks Forum, for the 12th man, by the 12th man.

Re: Russell Wilson

Postby River Dog » Tue Dec 24, 2024 3:35 pm

trents wrote:Yep, you're correct. My bad. Georg Pickens. But I didn't get him confused with Slim Pickens. George has been out the last three games with a concussion.


Slim Pickens? Now that dates you! A couple days ago, I referred to Joe Buck as Jack Buck. Boy, if that doesn't date me!

And hey look! We now have 29 pages of Russell Wilson posts!
River Dog
Legacy
 
Posts: 1031
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2024 6:38 pm

Re: Russell Wilson

Postby River Dog » Thu Jan 16, 2025 1:05 pm

It was an up and down year for our former signal caller, but it ended on a downer. The Steelers lost their last 5 games in a row, including last weekend's wild card loss to their division rival Ravens. Russell's stat line was nothing to write home about. He had a very respectable TD:INT ratio, throwing 16 touchdowns to just 5 picks, but his completion percentage was on the low side at 63.7%, his passer rating a lackluster 95.6, and he's still taking a lot of sacks, averaging 3 per game, one of the highest sack rates in the league.

What the Steelers will do in the offseason is a bit of a mystery. Russell has said that he wants to stay with them....but of course, he said the same thing in Seattle just before he waived his no-trade clause to become a Bronco. There are rumors of friction between Russ and OC Authur Smith, and HC Mike Tomlin has kept his cards close to his vest about the QB position, whether the team keeps Russ, Justin Fields, or if they let both go. And Smith could end up as the HC with someone else. He has interviews lined up with both the Jets and the Bears.

Thoughts?
River Dog
Legacy
 
Posts: 1031
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2024 6:38 pm

Re: Russell Wilson

Postby trents » Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:06 pm

Opponents at the end of the season started double teaming George Pickens and took the deep ball away from Russ, which is his forte. Russ was forced to rely on the short passing game which he has never been good at. I think his stature hurts him in the short pass game. At the same time, taking away the deep threat allowed opponents to pack the box and take away the Steeler's run game. And the Steeler's O line struggled to protect. It all imploded. It's hard to say how much of all that can be laid on Russ.
trents
Legacy
 
Posts: 1311
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:26 pm
Location: Centralia, WA

Re: Russell Wilson

Postby 4XPIPS » Tue Mar 25, 2025 4:24 pm

The beat goes on! Russell now a Giant. Interesting he got signed before Aaron.
User avatar
4XPIPS
Legacy
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:59 am
Location: Ahwatukee, AZ

Re: Russell Wilson

Postby River Dog » Tue Mar 25, 2025 5:36 pm

4XPIPS wrote:The beat goes on! Russell now a Giant. Interesting he got signed before Aaron.


I'm not sure why it would be surprising that Russ signed before Rodgers. The Giants obviously felt that they were the odd man out in the Aaron Rodgers sweepstakes.
They're a rebuilding team that isn't expected to contend, and Rodgers will likely end up with either the Vikings or Steelers, both playoff teams from a year ago.

The deal is pretty paltry as far as NFL QB's goes and significantly lower than the $20-30M Russ was looking for. It's a one-year deal is worth $10.5m with incentives that could push it to $21M.
River Dog
Legacy
 
Posts: 1031
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2024 6:38 pm

Re: Russell Wilson

Postby 4XPIPS » Tue Mar 25, 2025 6:06 pm

River Dog wrote:
I'm not sure why it would be surprising that Russ signed before Rodgers. The Giants obviously felt that they were the odd man out in the Aaron Rodgers sweepstakes.
They're a rebuilding team that isn't expected to contend, and Rodgers will likely end up with either the Vikings or Steelers, both playoff teams from a year ago.

The deal is pretty paltry as far as NFL QB's goes and significantly lower than the $20-30M Russ was looking for. It's a one-year deal is worth $10.5m with incentives that could push it to $21M.


Then it poses the question. Knowing full well this probably would never happen, but the pieces were there to make it happen. Bear with me.. why didn't the Hawks just sign Russell to $21m per year, and use him as a bridge for the future? I believe most of the beef was between Pete and him, and John was the guy who pounded the table to draft him after we had signed Matt Flynn.

If we weren't a contender, and signing Darnold doesn't make us a contender immediately and he appears to be the bridge for the future..... then why didn't we just do it with Russ? If one can see that Russ and Darnold will probably give you the same output next season, why not save the money and make it a homecoming of sorts. Most of the locker room has flipped since then, or did he burn the bridge that bad that reunion would have been off the table? Clearly Russ has to realize by now he isn't close to the elite QB he once was, but if given the magic wand and I was given the choice between Russ for $21 m per year vs Darnold round $30 m per year, hmmm I may go with Russ, but that's me.
User avatar
4XPIPS
Legacy
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:59 am
Location: Ahwatukee, AZ

Re: Russell Wilson

Postby River Dog » Tue Mar 25, 2025 6:26 pm

4XPIPS wrote:Then it poses the question. Knowing full well this probably would never happen, but the pieces were there to make it happen. Bear with me.. why didn't the Hawks just sign Russell to $21m per year, and use him as a bridge for the future? I believe most of the beef was between Pete and him, and John was the guy who pounded the table to draft him after we had signed Matt Flynn.

If we weren't a contender, and signing Darnold doesn't make us a contender immediately and he appears to be the bridge for the future..... then why didn't we just do it with Russ? If one can see that Russ and Darnold will probably give you the same output next season, why not save the money and make it a homecoming of sorts. Most of the locker room has flipped since then, or did he burn the bridge that bad that reunion would have been off the table? Clearly Russ has to realize by now he isn't close to the elite QB he once was, but if given the magic wand and I was given the choice between Russ for $21 m per year vs Darnold round $30 m per year, hmmm I may go with Russ, but that's me.


Bringing Russell back to the Hawks would be out of the question IMO. If you heard the reception he received when he returned to Seattle, there is a significant part of the fan base that can't stand him. And how do we know that most of the beef was between Russ and Pete didn't include JS? Rumor is that Russell lobbied ownership to fire both JS as well as Pete. There's also rumors that JS and Russell's agent don't see eye to eye. It would have been a huge distraction that our young coaching staff doesn't need.

Besides, now that Metcalf is gone, we don't have that big, fast deep threat that plays to Russell's biggest attribute. He does not excel in the short passing game, which seems to be the direction we're heading.
River Dog
Legacy
 
Posts: 1031
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2024 6:38 pm

Re: Russell Wilson

Postby NorthHawk » Wed Mar 26, 2025 8:22 am

I don't think it's that complicated. Schneider and Wilson's agent Mark Rogers (I think) hate each other so they wouldn't even get to the negotiating stage.
NorthHawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 11292
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:57 am

Previous

Return to Seahawks Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aseahawkfan, c_hawkbob, River Dog, Stream Hawk and 5 guests