trents wrote:DK's behavior has undermined his market value. There were warning signs of these tendencies coming out of college and they proved to be true.
4XPIPS wrote:goodness... all the fun happens when I am away, I was freedom camping the north of the South Island, it was quite nice to be disconnected to the digital world for 14 days. Well well DK got traded, and as I had predicted two things were going to happen with him, either a trade or extension. Not upset about the trade, just wish we got more in return, but they way overpaid for him. So in the end we got something, and we don't have to pay $30 mil per year for a skill position.
c_hawkbob wrote:As usual this conversation has gone way overboard on what a poor receiver DK was, led of course by Riv, who seems to have a never ending axe to grind with the guy.
First, as to his value; DK wouldn't have gotten the contract he landed with the Steelers if he were dog food. And we wouldn't have offered him the same contract if we didn't see in him the same thing they did. He never was Largent or Lockett as far as his precise rout running but he still can take the top off a defense as well as anyone in the NFL.
Second as to his attitude, he didn't complain at all when we went to using him as the double and triple team draw in the 4 by 1 formation to spring JSN and Lockett and our TE's for all the yards and all the credit, but I have no doubt that's what propelled him to ask for a trade this offseason. Football during the season and business during the offseason, isn't that how all prefer it to be?
For myself I'm sad to see him go, he was one of my favorites, and still will be even though I'll never be able to root for his new team. I wish him luck.
I'm also happy we landed Kupp, who I don't see as a replacement for DK but think he'll go a long way towards lessening the loss of Lockett. I don't think our WR's are the strength they were last year, but we're not destitute in the WR room either.
c_hawkbob wrote:As usual this conversation has gone way overboard on what a poor receiver DK was, led of course by Riv, who seems to have a never ending axe to grind with the guy.
First, as to his value; DK wouldn't have gotten the contract he landed with the Steelers if he were dog food. And we wouldn't have offered him the same contract if we didn't see in him the same thing they did. He never was Largent or Lockett as far as his precise rout running but he still can take the top off a defense as well as anyone in the NFL.
c_hawkbob wrote:Second as to his attitude, he didn't complain at all when we went to using him as the double and triple team draw in the 4 by 1 formation to spring JSN and Lockett and our TE's for all the yards and all the credit, but I have no doubt that's what propelled him to ask for a trade this offseason. Football during the season and business during the offseason, isn't that how all prefer it to be?
c_hawkbob wrote:For myself I'm sad to see him go, he was one of my favorites, and still will be even though I'll never be able to root for his new team. I wish him luck.
I'm also happy we landed Kupp, who I don't see as a replacement for DK but think he'll go a long way towards lessening the loss of Lockett. I don't think our WR's are the strength they were last year, but we're not destitute in the WR room either.
River Dog wrote:No one said that Metcalf was "dog food", and certainly not me. My position was, and still is, that he's not a top 10 receiver worth market setting money. Given that there are 64 starting WR's in this league, saying that he's not top 10 isn't derogatory. It means that he could start for damn near any team.
The other part of that equation is that I have made it very well known for a number of years that I think wide receivers in general are overrated, that they're a dime a dozen, yada yada yada. Of course, I have had a "never ending axe to grind" with him due to the position he plays.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Then again very few teams have QBs with the arm talent to use DK well. Most QBs are dink and dunkers hoping the team can win keeping turnovers down and playing good defense. You don't need a Corvette receiver for that. You're better off with your Toyota Corolla steady, reliable receivers for that type offense to go with your Toyota Corolla QBs who keep the dink and dunk offense going while keeping turnovers reasonable.
River Dog wrote:Which is one of the reasons why I devalued him. He was not a versatile receiver who could be inserted into a variety of offenses and be fully utilized. He couldn't be utilized on jet sweeps or bubble screens, for example. You have to have a quarterback, like Russell, who could throw a good deep ball, and Russell throws one of the prettiest moon balls in the league.
NorthHawk wrote:According to this article DK has made previous trade requests. Kudos to be he and the team for keeping it under wraps.
https://www.profootballrumors.com/2025/ ... triots-fit
NorthHawk wrote:I don't think he's that bad as WRs go. As a group there seem to be a lot more Prima Donna's at WR and his pouting is small potatoes compared to others we've seen in the NFL in the past.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I sympathize with DK. I would hate being on a team where my talents were wasted and I could not reach my potential and there was nothing I could do about it. It would irritate me. You're this 6'4' inch speed demon and you gotta play dink and dunk ball on a team going nowhere with a backup QB as your QB because the All Pro you were looking forward to play with fell off hard and the high energy coach was cooked. That would be super frustrating.
That is the life of an athlete who can't pick where they go.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests