Anthony wrote:Andre Johnson, Frank Gore agree to join Colts together, per report
http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/and ... ar-AA9Bpjy
If this is true, This is how a team puts playmakers around their franchise QB
mykc14 wrote:
So you complain about the Hawks re-signing a MUCH MUCH MUCH better RB in Lynch but all of the sudden Gore is some huge weapon. Come on. The Hawks have TRIED much harder than acquiring an over the hill RB and 34 year old WR to put playmakers around RW, they just haven't done a great job on the WR front.
jshawaii22 wrote:Old Relics of the game... notice that these are two players on the downhill side of their careers? If you bring them in expecting to see 1200 yards from Gore and 1000+ from Andre, you probably overspent and are dreaming.
js
NorthHawk wrote:I think in their Offense, 1000 yards from Johnson isn't a stretch if he stays healthy.
Teams have a choice to make - go heavy on Offense or Defense.
The Colts have gone big on Offense, but their D isn't anything to write home about.
That being said, I think we need more attention to our Offense as our Defense will still be a little banged up to begin the year and probably won't be able to carry the load like they have the last few years.
Anthony wrote:
Dude get a clue, The hawks may have tried but they failed. Johnson would be a huge upgrade to any Wr we have period. Then your focus on Gore is laughable, the point was Indy needed to put weapons around Luck and they did. We need to put weapons around Rw and to date we have not, period not arguable its the truth period. My complaint about resigning Lynch, which I am still waiting to say my feelings, has more to do with our lack of putting receiving weapons around Wilson, and resigning Lynch will hinder that or make the FO feel like they can skate by again. Add in Lynch still had another year left on his contract and yet we did not make him honor it, so what happens after this year and he pulls this crap again, we going to continue to give more and more? I sure hope not.
All that aside Indy is putting weapons around their franchise QB we have not remember they also signed Carters Kid who from all accounts is a beast at WR. Good enough for us to be interested as well. SO as I said they are putting weapons around their Franchise QB we are not. So far
Anthony wrote:
Then your focus on Gore is laughable, the point was Indy needed to put weapons around Luck and they did. We need to put weapons around Rw and to date we have not, period not arguable its the truth period.
NorthHawk wrote:They haven't put many around Wilson until today.
1 (Lynch) isn't many, but adding Graham should help out a lot.
mykc14 wrote:
Using your logic the Hawks should have cut Lynch and then signed Gore and Johnson, thus putting more 'weapons' around him. I'll bet if you were to ask RW which weapon/s he would rather have he would choose Lynch every time. Therefore, (come on follow me here) the Hawks HAVE put weapons around RW.
NorthHawk wrote:They haven't put many around Wilson until today.
1 (Lynch) isn't many, but adding Graham should help out a lot.
mykc14 wrote:
I know Lynch isn't 'many' but the OP was saying Gore + Johnson is. My point was Lynch > Gore & Johnson. Now, obviously, Graham is a big time weapon.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests