NorthHawk wrote:I was under the impression that most contracts restrict activities that players can do that would put their health in danger.
As I don't know much about this show, it might be benign in it's risk.
burrrton wrote:It's just an extremely difficult test of agility, strength, and endurance. It's not dangerous in the least, or at least no more so than virtually any other form of training this side of a light jog on even pavement.
NorthHawk wrote:I was under the impression that most contracts restrict activities that players can do that would put their health in danger.
As I don't know much about this show, it might be benign in it's risk.
It's absolutely more dangerous than a light jog on even pavement.
burrrton wrote:But missing a swinging ring and falling into a pool of water 6' below is hardly Russian roulette.
burrrton wrote:Bob- would you characterize gymnastics (by gymnasts, not a goof like me), or beach volleyball, as "dangerous" activities?
The National Center for Catastrophic Sports Injury Research found that cheerleading accounted for 70.5 percent of catastrophic injuries -- fatal, disabling or serious -- suffered by college athletes.
HumanCockroach wrote:RD, it isn't most players, it's some players, typically stars that have enormous guarantees.Ryan Isn't that guy, just like Okung, and numerous other players.
Volleyball no, especially beach volleyball.
Gymnastics yes
There are hundreds of activities, snow skiing, horseback riding, even riding a bicycle that could be considered dangerous if they're calling things like pickup basketball dangerous.
burrrton wrote:
Why not? They twist ankles all the time.
Yeah, the locker room after a gymnastics match looks like a M.A.S.H. unit...
How about Track and Field?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 18 guests