savvyman wrote:Yep - The Un-Sayable is now being said by the 12th Man.
https://twitter.com/johnmarkrodgers/status/615743046752206848
Sorry Russell you are being Selfish & Greedy.
HumanCockroach wrote:Even IF that were the case, I always side with the player, and always will. It's the way America is run, get what you can, while you can. Owners certainly are not paying guys they deem to expensive, two signatures on those contracts not just one, yet fans often turn on the players for their "greed", while accepting it's a "business" for the billionaires, well, it is for the players as well, and as with ANY business, you attempt to maximize your potential profit, the SAME as the billionaires .
Vegaseahawk wrote:I like Danny's take on this subject.
http://bleacherreport.com/tb/dgWPV?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=seattle-seahawks
RiverDog wrote:I don't completely agree. I do think that loyalty should be factored in, particularly with Russell, who may never have seen the light of day had it not been for Pete Carroll and John Schneider putting their trust in him, first in selecting him well above where he was projected to go, and second by giving him the opportunity to start. I'm not saying that he should sign for a huge discount, only that he would be very disingenuous to those who put their own careers on the line to give him his opportunity if he were to simply put himself out to the highest bidder ala Alex Rodriguez.
Anthony wrote:Some truth to what you say but we do know Philly was going to take him if we did not, and judging by what happened there the odds are pretty good he would have gotten his chance. Also lets not forget JS and PC benefited form Wilson as well.
RiverDog wrote:
We KNOW that Philly was going to take him? How do we KNOW this?
The fact is that Russell was rated as no higher than a 5th round pick and that our selection of him in the 3rd was widely viewed as a reach. I know that I was initially upset that we burned a 3rd on him and felt that we could have had him for at least a round lower.
Obviously PC and JS benefited greatly from Russell's contributions, as they have from a very large number of current and former players, and they owe Russell a great deal. Loyalty is a two way street.
Anthony wrote:Ahh dude their then head coach came out and said it shortly after the draft
burrrton wrote:Nobody's paying him anything approaching $25M/season to play SS/2B. He's not playing effing baseball.
RiverDog wrote:
He's not a very good baseball player. I think his career batting average in Class A, which is professional baseball's equivalent of NCAA Division III, was something like .230.
RiverDog wrote:
Yea, dude, you're exactly right. We all know with 100% certainty that head coaches always tell the truth about everything all the time.
mykc14 wrote:That translates to a .175 in the majors. He could hold down a utility infield position on the M's with that.
Hawktown wrote:I'll just have to reply... DON'T BREAK THE BANK FOR THE GUY! There is MUCH, MUCH more to it than OVERpaying one guy.
PAY THE MAN BUT KEEP IT TO WHERE THE TEAM CAN COMPETE!!!
obiken wrote:I give up, not only I am disillusioned on RW as a person, I am at the point that we just carry him to the end of contract and tag him next year after we win our 2nd SB. IF we don't, see ya.
obiken wrote:I give up, not only I am disillusioned on RW as a person, I am at the point that we just carry him to the end of contract and tag him next year after we win our 2nd SB. IF we don't, see ya.
obiken wrote:If we were talking 15 20 million it would be a done deal. Sorry we are talking stratosphere numbers here.. NO, I don't hate RW, I just move him to normal class of PRO athlete. MY heart hasn't been broken since Drexler went to Houston to get a ring, which I understood 100%, but then he goes into the Hall as a Rocket, really?? A rocket. Screw these athletes. 100 million here, a 150 there, and our leaders are bitching about giving the average guy 15 bucks an hour.
obiken wrote:IF IT WASNT FOR THE CAP, I WOULD GIVE A RIP if he made 1 billion. But I don't want to become like the Ravens where it could take years to get back to the SB. My question is will we ever know the numbers IF he leaves. Neither side will want to be the bad guy. The Times backs me up his rep has taken a hit period.
HumanCockroach wrote:Hell, if he played catcher he could start with that.
HumanCockroach wrote:Did I say he was? Truth is, plenty MLB players don't put up eye popping stats in less than a single season of baseball, Wilson was good enough to be drafted twice. Basing an assessment on 300 at bats in the minors is comparable to saying after a bad series in pre-season, a QB can never play football.
Wilson IS a QB, but if you believe that his work ethic would remain constant ( which I personally have zero reason to believe wouldn't be the case) claiming he could not be a MLB player is silly. Baseball is indeed a sport that requires repetition to improve, most minor league players have between 3500 and 5000 ab's before sniffing the majors, ( and indeed MANY major league all stars and HOF players performed comparably to Wilson)Wilson had less than a tenth of that. I don't see him doing so, nor do I want to see him do so, but I'm not foolish enough to claim he " can not" play baseball, OBVIOUSLY he can, or he would not have been drafted once, much less twice.
HumanCockroach wrote:And you are assuming that Wilson would only do so part time. My point is simply that if he had stayed with baseball, worked as diligently as he has at football, he could indeed have been as successful playing baseball as football. By all means, continue to infer things that are not intended or said into my posts, but at the very least se me the RD baseball scout cliff notes. Wilson did NOT play "two full seasons" of baseball, you know that, as do I, and anyone else who knows anything about the man.
Users browsing this forum: 4XPIPS and 7 guests