Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Official Seahawks Forum, for the 12th man, by the 12th man.

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Wed Jul 01, 2015 6:56 pm

MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:Future,

I'm still on a wait and see from two guys that are coming back from ACL tears; Dockett is 290 pounds and in the trenches and Bowman's injury, again, was just nasty. Maybe they come back 100% and last the whole season, and I hope they do just from a personal goodwill standpoint; this is their livelihood, but I've got to see it to believe it. The others stepping up could do a great job as starters, but then, if your depth last year is stepping up, who's your depth this year?

You've got guys returning from injury, last year's depth starting this year, and untested depth behind them as well as major losses in coaching staff. I'm not writing them off, I'm just not as optimistic about them.


That's where I disagree; Aldon Smith, Tramaine Brock, Glenn Dorsey and Ian Williams are not depth stating. They are all starters returning. Last yr was the yr depth started in place of these guys. And that is not even counting Bowman, who we both agree must be seen in live action to assess.

In terms of Bowman, by the time he hits the field it'll have been 1 yr and 8 mo since his injury. He's clicked a 4.5 40 and demonstrated the most important attribute in a knee revovery, and that is great lateral movement. By all reports he was all over the field in OTAs. I think it's reasonable to assume that he'll be a very good LB at the very least.

And we have a ton of young talent. I haven't spouted off about Aaron Lynch because obviously, he hadn't started a full season. But on NN I have posted he's a rising star, and looks to be a dominant wreck all LB. Pair him with Aldon and it's not even close to a stretch to project them as the best pass rushing tandem in the league.

Again, you guys are not considering these things. 2 star pass rushers will win you a lot of games in this league.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby burrrton » Wed Jul 01, 2015 7:23 pm

Popular opinion does carry some weight. You cannot simply discount it completely.


Er, it depends what you're arguing, counsel. You should know that dmn good and well.

[edit- and no, I'm not arguing about how well or bad your team is going to end up- I have no idea and don't give a sht beyond how it affects my team]
User avatar
burrrton
Legacy
 
Posts: 4213
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:20 am

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Wed Jul 01, 2015 10:20 pm

Burrton;

Yes, I agree. As I've said many times here before, any sort of logical analysis should begin with the most widely accepted practice or belief. I can definitely understand the basis for the dismal predictions. I am arguing that previously undisclosed facts to that argument - which are msterial - if considered, may result in the opposite conclusion ;).

This is why the games are settled on the field!
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby burrrton » Wed Jul 01, 2015 10:30 pm

As I've said many times here before, any sort of logical analysis should begin with the most widely accepted practice or belief.


???

Logical analysis *never* begins with group-think.

Maybe I'm mistaken on what I recall you saying you do for a living- do you really believe this??

This is why the games are settled on the field!


Regardless of anything else, on this we agree.
User avatar
burrrton
Legacy
 
Posts: 4213
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:20 am

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby RiverDog » Thu Jul 02, 2015 1:50 am

Old but Slow wrote:I don't want to feel sorry for the Forty-Niners, I want to hate them.


My feelings exactly, and it is for this reason why I am going to really miss Jim Harbaugh. This season is going to be like Monday Night Football without Howard Cosell.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Thu Jul 02, 2015 7:37 am

Hey, you guys are the new standard. You have the coach, the D and the QB. About 12 wins is my guess. I am just showing the opposite side of the coin. I'm still excited for the season, and I think my optimism is based on solid reasoning.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby RiverDog » Thu Jul 02, 2015 9:01 am

Futureite wrote:Hey, you guys are the new standard. You have the coach, the D and the QB. About 12 wins is my guess. I am just showing the opposite side of the coin. I'm still excited for the season, and I think my optimism is based on solid reasoning.


Missed the playoffs the previous year, a Murderer's Row schedule this year, and having what is almost unanimously reported as one of the worst offseasons in recent memory? All I can say is that you have a very wide definition of the term "solid reasoning."

But 12 wins for us is probably pretty reasonable. I can even see reasons for dropping a prediction down to 11 or even 10 wins.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Thu Jul 02, 2015 11:11 am

River;

Well, again, lost in that analysis is the players who are returning and who barely played last yr. Just like an accounting equation, you look at what left, what came in and the net is the overall value. I've tried to break all of that down, with logical analysis. I mean people are pounding the exit of 34 yr old Justin Smith who admitted himself he was not the same player last yr, and completely ignoring the return of one of the top 3 pass rushers in the entire league in 26 yr old Aldon Smith.

I think the analysis is completely one sided, to the point where it's not even analysis but national fluff click piece work. I mean, some of these articles are projecting Arik Armstead to start LOL. Seems like the bay is the only area that has any sort of handle on the actual roster and what had happened to it last yr.

And I know this is entirely impossible here, but what if in some crazy world Dontae' Johnson, Aaron Lynch, Carlos Hyde, Marcus Martin and Brandon Thomas et al are studs? LOL it's as if you guys have ruled out them even being capable NFL starters. I guess that only happens with Seahawks draft picks, right? I haven't even included any of these guys (with the possible exception of Lynch) in my analysis, but what "if" they are good?

There's a LOT missing in these projections. In fact, literally half of the equation.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby kalibane » Mon Jul 06, 2015 5:25 am

No Future nothing is getting lost in the analysis. You pretending that Aldon Smith "barely played" last year and thus is a "returning" player that should be almost counted as an addition is ridiculous. Aldon Smith played 7 games last year and was practically a non-factor in those 7 games. He came back when the Niners were still in contention for the division (and was actually cited by you as why the Niners were still poised to make a run last year). He wasn't off due to injury so you can't blame his poor performance on being trying to recover. If your contention is he was out of shape and thus not himself then he's just lazy and that hardly counts in your favor.

Aldon Smith is not a "returning" player. He was there last year and while I don't believe he'll be as big a non factor as he was last year, he's been accounted for in the analysis, you're just trying to delude yourself into thinking that he wasn't there just because he didn't produce while he was. The other guys you keep talking about are Glen Dorsey and Ian Williams who 1. play the same position and 2. Are not dynamic playmakers. You're not getting Cortez Kennedy back here... You're talking about 2 decent 3-4 nose tackles one of whom has 1 good season out of 7 in the NFL where he actually played well.

Bowman is the only impact player who you are getting back and he's been accounted for.

Does that mean the Niners are all of a sudden going to be the Chicago Bears on Defense? No... but I don't see them being the dominant unit they were the last 3-4 years and since your offense is challenged to say the least (and has also suffered its own losses) there really isn't a good case for them to be improved.
kalibane
Legacy
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:42 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby RiverDog » Mon Jul 06, 2015 5:50 am

Futureite wrote:River;

Well, again, lost in that analysis is the players who are returning and who barely played last yr. Just like an accounting equation, you look at what left, what came in and the net is the overall value. I've tried to break all of that down, with logical analysis. I mean people are pounding the exit of 34 yr old Justin Smith who admitted himself he was not the same player last yr, and completely ignoring the return of one of the top 3 pass rushers in the entire league in 26 yr old Aldon Smith.

I think the analysis is completely one sided, to the point where it's not even analysis but national fluff click piece work. I mean, some of these articles are projecting Arik Armstead to start LOL. Seems like the bay is the only area that has any sort of handle on the actual roster and what had happened to it last yr.

And I know this is entirely impossible here, but what if in some crazy world Dontae' Johnson, Aaron Lynch, Carlos Hyde, Marcus Martin and Brandon Thomas et al are studs? LOL it's as if you guys have ruled out them even being capable NFL starters. I guess that only happens with Seahawks draft picks, right? I haven't even included any of these guys (with the possible exception of Lynch) in my analysis, but what "if" they are good?

There's a LOT missing in these projections. In fact, literally half of the equation.


As Kalibane pointed out, the Niners had a worse W/L record with Smith in the lineup for 7 games vs. without him for 9. In addition, we've all seen how his production fell off a cliff when the Cowboy was out with an injury a couple of years ago. Who do you guys have along the DL that's going to demand double teams like the Cowboy did?
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Mon Jul 06, 2015 7:30 am

kalibane wrote:No Future nothing is getting lost in the analysis. You pretending that Aldon Smith "barely played" last year and thus is a "returning" player that should be almost counted as an addition is ridiculous. Aldon Smith played 7 games last year and was practically a non-factor in those 7 games. He came back when the Niners were still in contention for the division (and was actually cited by you as why the Niners were still poised to make a run last year). He wasn't off due to injury so you can't blame his poor performance on being trying to recover. If your contention is he was out of shape and thus not himself then he's just lazy and that hardly counts in your favor.

Aldon Smith is not a "returning" player. He was there last year and while I don't believe he'll be as big a non factor as he was last year, he's been accounted for in the analysis, you're just trying to delude yourself into thinking that he wasn't there just because he didn't produce while he was. The other guys you keep talking about are Glen Dorsey and Ian Williams who 1. play the same position and 2. Are not dynamic playmakers. You're not getting Cortez Kennedy back here... You're talking about 2 decent 3-4 nose tackles one of whom has 1 good season out of 7 in the NFL where he actually played well.

Bowman is the only impact player who you are getting back and he's been accounted for.

Does that mean the Niners are all of a sudden going to be the Chicago Bears on Defense? No... but I don't see them being the dominant unit they were the last 3-4 years and since your offense is challenged to say the least (and has also suffered its own losses) there really isn't a good case for them to be improved.


That's just ridiculous. The same EXACT thing happened in 2013 when Aldon sat. He really did not even get going until the postseason, and he was again dominant. He pressured Wilson that entire game and started it with a strip/sack/recovery. Someone as analytical as you obviously knows a player cannot come in cold more than halfway through a season and perform at the same level. Even Michael Jordan struggled after he returned to Basketball.

Yes, Aldon Smith struggled when Justin was out. It's also true that Aldon played that entire time with a torn labrum. We've all seen pkayers struggle with injuries, including several of your own Seahawks.

The guy is proven to be one of the best (if not THE best) pass rushers in the entire league. He set the freaking record for sacks over his first 3 yrs. The TE game where Justin grabbed the tackle and Aldon looped under is what people are referring to when they attribute Aldon's production to Justin, and it's been greatly exagerated. There's plenty of highlight reels you can pull up where he is destroying one on one matchups or beating double teams opposite Justin. You'd have to literally be blind not to see how takented he is.

And do you know our system?? Dorsey and Williams are not expected to be dynamic players. Isaac Sopoaga wasn't dynamic in 2011 when our D was its most dominant. These guys are just suppose to eat up blockers and plug holes so guys like Aldon, Aaron Lynch snd Bowman CAN br dynamic.

And speaking of Lynch, you're obviously clueless about the roster, as you're citing Ahmad Brooks, who many around here believe may not even be on the ream this entire season. LOL and you guys will be posting how effed we are losing another player if/when it happens.

Post again about week 12 when our D is still one of the top 5 in the league.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby kalibane » Mon Jul 06, 2015 8:49 am

Future,

If you weren't making the case that the return of Williams and Dorsey were going to bolster your defensive I wouldn't be talking about how much dynamism they lack. They have been serviceable to good. Not bad. But in the context of a 3-4 (not that they'd make a big difference in the 4-3 either) NONE of those guys is going to have the type of impact that will reshape the defense like say Haloti Ngata or Casey Hampton. Even Hampton wasn't all that dynamic but he was far more impactful than any of your nose tackles are. They are damn near replacement level talent. You talking up Dorsey and Ian Williams would be like me hypothetically saying "Just wait until Tony McDaniels gets back"... Dude stop. We wouldn't be talking about this in the first place if you weren't continuing to bring up Dorsey and Williams like them coming back are going to represent some kind of massive upgrade. You don't even see us talking about how Mebane is going to make a big impact on our defense and he's measurably better in that two gap role than any of your guys.

And please don't deign to tell me what I do and don't know about your roster. YOU were the one who brought up Ahmad Brooks in this thread and citing him as an asset not me. My response was that Ahmad Brooks looks done, essentially conceding that Lynch will probably be starting. (If he's not that ain't good news) You are assuming Lynch is going to better than Brooks in a full time role based on his flash plays as a back up just like the Browns did with Paul Kruger Remind me how that worked out again? Or again to use a Seahawk example, it'd be like us pretending that Malcolm Smith was the next great inside LB because he played well in and replacing injured players.

And sorry bruh... it doesn't take half the season to round into form especially when you have no injuries. One or two games where he didn't show up fine... 7 games? He didn't miss two years... he missed 9 weeks and went through training camp so save that Jordan garbage. That's not rust and the implication that it was is completely laughable. And the funny thing is I never dismissed Aldon Smith (although the idea that he's the best pass rusher in a league where JJ Watt plays is pure hyperbole). I count Aldon Smith and Bowman (if his knee is good) as the two players that you do have that can be truly dynamic with Bethea (assuming he maintains last year's level of play) being another actual asset. Everywhere else is either nothing special, flat out bad or a question mark. And your depth is completely gutted. And again you LOST almost your entire coaching staff. Your new coordinator the "Mangenius" has never even produced a defense that ranked higher than 16 in the league in yards per game.

Like I said... in a league where the Cowboys did what they did last year... never say never but to project it happening based on the current state of your roster and coaching staff is just walking through life with a red and gold filter over everything.

Right now with your roster and no depth but assuming they get good coaching despite your DC following in the great tradition of overhyped coaches from NE who fell on their face after leaving I see the Niners ranking somewhere between 10-15 in team defense and your offense isn't going to be able to stay in games unless Hyde explodes.

At least Hyde exploding is in the realm of possibility unlike your previous jock riding of Kendall Hunter.... but that is ultimately what this boils down to. This is your pattern. You grab a bunch of young bench players pretend you have all this inside knowledge about them to claim they are just awesome players in waiting. We saw it with Kendall Hunter, Kyle Williams, Dan Skuta, that 2nd round WR that got traded to the Chiefs who I can't even remember. Now you're doing it with Aaron Lynch et. al... And if he is great but acting like people have faulty logic or taking the most negative view based on what we've seen to this point is just asinine there is not enough of a sample size to determine is Lynch is an asset or a downgrade from Brooks circa 2012/2013, although the safe bet is he's at least a slight downgrade.

P.S. It has not been lost on me how you just completely ignore the elephant in the room which is the loss of damn near your entire coaching staff. Going from Harbaugh to Tomsula is probably the biggest coaching downgrade of the year which is quite ironic considering your entire argument is based on player development.
kalibane
Legacy
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:42 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Mon Jul 06, 2015 10:28 am

kalibane wrote:Future,

If you weren't making the case that the return of Williams and Dorsey were going to bolster your defensive I wouldn't be talking about how much dynamism they lack. They have been serviceable to good. Not bad. But in the context of a 3-4 (not that they'd make a big difference in the 4-3 either) NONE of those guys is going to have the type of impact that will reshape the defense like say Haloti Ngata or Casey Hampton. Even Hampton wasn't all that dynamic but he was far more impactful than any of your nose tackles are. They are damn near replacement level talent. You talking up Dorsey and Ian Williams would be like me hypothetically saying "Just wait until Tony McDaniels gets back"... Dude stop. We wouldn't be talking about this in the first place if you weren't continuing to bring up Dorsey and Williams like them coming back are going to represent some kind of massive upgrade. You don't even see us talking about how Mebane is going to make a big impact on our defense and he's measurably better in that two gap role than any of your guys.

And please don't deign to tell me what I do and don't know about your roster. YOU were the one who brought up Ahmad Brooks in this thread and citing him as an asset not me. My response was that Ahmad Brooks looks done, essentially conceding that Lynch will probably be starting. (If he's not that ain't good news) You are assuming Lynch is going to better than Brooks in a full time role based on his flash plays as a back up just like the Browns did with Paul Kruger Remind me how that worked out again? Or again to use a Seahawk example, it'd be like us pretending that Malcolm Smith was the next great inside LB because he played well in and replacing injured players.

And sorry bruh... it doesn't take half the season to round into form especially when you have no injuries. One or two games where he didn't show up fine... 7 games? He didn't miss two years... he missed 9 weeks and went through training camp so save that Jordan garbage. That's not rust and the implication that it was is completely laughable. And the funny thing is I never dismissed Aldon Smith (although the idea that he's the best pass rusher in a league where JJ Watt plays is pure hyperbole). I count Aldon Smith and Bowman (if his knee is good) as the two players that you do have that can be truly dynamic with Bethea (assuming he maintains last year's level of play) being another actual asset. Everywhere else is either nothing special, flat out bad or a question mark. And your depth is completely gutted. And again you LOST almost your entire coaching staff. Your new coordinator the "Mangenius" has never even produced a defense that ranked higher than 16 in the league in yards per game.

Like I said... in a league where the Cowboys did what they did last year... never say never but to project it happening based on the current state of your roster and coaching staff is just walking through life with a red and gold filter over everything.

Right now with your roster and no depth but assuming they get good coaching despite your DC following in the great tradition of overhyped coaches from NE who fell on their face after leaving I see the Niners ranking somewhere between 10-15 in team defense and your offense isn't going to be able to stay in games unless Hyde explodes.

At least Hyde exploding is in the realm of possibility unlike your previous jock riding of Kendall Hunter.... but that is ultimately what this boils down to. This is your pattern. You grab a bunch of young bench players pretend you have all this inside knowledge about them to claim they are just awesome players in waiting. We saw it with Kendall Hunter, Kyle Williams, Dan Skuta, that 2nd round WR that got traded to the Chiefs who I can't even remember. Now you're doing it with Aaron Lynch et. al... And if he is great but acting like people have faulty logic or taking the most negative view based on what we've seen to this point is just asinine there is not enough of a sample size to determine is Lynch is an asset or a downgrade from Brooks circa 2012/2013, although the safe bet is he's at least a slight downgrade.

P.S. It has not been lost on me how you just completely ignore the elephant in the room which is the loss of damn near your entire coaching staff. Going from Harbaugh to Tomsula is probably the biggest coaching downgrade of the year which is quite ironic considering your entire argument is based on player development.


And was I right, or wrong?? Did our D not end up in the top 5 again with players like Skuta, Willhoite, Tony Jerod Eddie et all playing significant time last year? I've never insinuated that these players are pro bowl level talent, ever. But christ dude, look up and down the league at all of the players that have left SF and either started or received huge contracts. Ricky Jean Franciou barely saw the field here, and he received a big pay day and now starts in Tennessee. Marcus Cooper didn't even make our team, and he started an entire season in KC. This has been true, we have had an extremely deep team and I don't need to do much massaging to "make" anyone believe it. By the way, did you see Demarcus Dobbs out on the field in the SB this February in Seahawk Blue? Guess which team cut him?

I bring up Dorsey and Williams dude because we were starting our entire backup Dline rotation for a good portion of last year. So YES, sorry, but having starters return that anchored what was clearly one of the top Ds in the entire league in 2013 is a big deal. Look at how bad your D tanked when you lost just a couple freaking players, and yet here you are yapping. I heard everyone from your own radio guys (when I visited) to ESPN talking about how much getter you D was with Wagner. And he's just a freaking middle line backer. Some of what you post is hard to believe, honestly.

You can hold your opinion on Aldon, that's fine. You'll find detractors for any great player. I can go to NFL.Com right now and find people claiming Aaron Rodgers is grossly overrated, that he can only function under X, Y and Z conditions, look at his 178 YD 2 Int performance in the Championchip game, etc. I take it with a grain of salt. I could tell Aldon was going to be a great player just by watching his film at Mizzou when we drafted him. Even if you ignored his production or discounted it completely because of who he plays with, it's fairly easy to see that he is a freak athlete with a ridiculous motor. It's not exactly a stretch to say he's one of the most dominant players in the NFL.

On Lynch, when have I ever asserted any of our backups had the potential that he does? Yes, Kendall Hunter is a quality backup that has broken off quite a few explosive runs and TDs. I never insinuated he's an all pro caliber player. He definitely hasproven that he's a great change of pace back who can pick up yds and make big plays. If you deny that, you're denying reality. Those type of players do in fact make a huge difference in the overall performance of a team. Lynch is clearly a next level athlete though, and his ability was born out through the pressure that he brought last year. If not for questions about his character, it was widely acknowledged he'd have been a high 1st RD pick. If you want my prediction, yes, "he" will be a star in this league. Not a Hunter or Skuta who are capable backups, but a star.

Last, who is ignoring the elephant in the room? I did in fact acknowledge our staff. I loved our former staff. But it's also a reality that our O had a near historically bad performance last yr in many facets. What I stated was, if our D performs at near the same level as it did last yr - and one would expect that with the net change on D - then we should be a better team. Why? Because we should be better on O. It would be hard to be much worse than last yr. We have more speed on O now, more dynamic players, more options. On top of that, one would logically expect that a change in scheme from the stuck in quicksand antiquated temp/play calling to an O with pace and rhythm will help the O in some respects. It's hard to argue that it wouldn't.

You have an agenda, and I get it. You don't like our team, every player cannot do what he did in years past, everything good was a result of something else that cannot be duplicated, on and on. Remember, I heard this from most of your board in 2011, all yr. Then I read some of it in 2013 when we started 1-2. Because I am a homer, I expect a SB contender. But even logically speaking, you look at the net losses and net gains and its a 10 win team at least.

Like I said, we will see!
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Mon Jul 06, 2015 11:00 am

kalibane;

PS, you are an intelligent guy and you state your augments well. I enjoy posting with you, River and others. I acknowledge Hawks are the team to beat in the division and probably the NFL. But don't expect me to ever give up on my team.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby kalibane » Tue Jul 07, 2015 5:07 am

Future why do you think people scooping up your scraps for depth means those scraps are actually good players? It means they are replacement level at best. The fact that the Cleveland Browns claimed Michael Bowie off waivers from the Seahawks is not proof that the Seahawks have back up OTs that are ready to step in and replace Russell Okung.

Demarcus Dobbs was scooped up because the Seahawks were desperate for DT help after losing Mebane, Jordan Hill and Jesse Williams not because he was so good that he couldn't be on the street. He barely has a minimum contract and will be at the bottom of the depth chart if he even makes the final roster. Ricky Jean Francios was widely considered one of the worst contracts of that free agent year and the Colts (not Titans) were ridiculed mercilously. He has since been released and was now signed by the Redskins. Dan Skuta is a depth player and isn't even projected to start for the Jaguars (although he might be forced due to injuries). When you have team success people inevitably overpay for your cast offs... look at the contract Byron Maxwell just got or the contract O'Brien Schofield got from the Giants after 2013.

There is a big difference from bringing these kind of guys in the game when you're in a pinch and having a talented coaching staff scheming around them to hide their weaknesses and relying on these guys to be your starters. You're now in a position where you are looking at latter and the next person that gets hurt you're playing street free agent level guys.

Your entire belief is based on every single thing working out... the corners develop to be better than last year's even though they couldn't beat out last year's corners and one of them (Ward) was kind of an embarrassment and got buried, Dorsey and Williams play at the level of Dorsey's career year rather than their typical level of play for their collective careers. Darnell Docket not only comes back 100% from ACL surgery at 34 but rejuvenates his game to mirror his production 2-3 years ago, adapts to a new role and is able to match what Justin Smith did for you. Lynch takes over for Brooks at OLB and plays at or above his level from 2011-2013 over 16 games. Navarro Bowman makes a complete recovery and is an all-pro LB again. Antoine Bethea shows no slippage in his play even though it's above the level he has typically played at and is aging. You somehow are able to mask the absence of Patrick Willis for 16 games with replacement level talent. None of your key players suffer injuries. And a vastly overhyped defensive coordinator who hasn't actually ever fielded a dominant defense does so for the first time in his career. I mean you can't even bank on the fact that Mangini was a holdover from last year because he was coaching TEs.

Those are the things that need to happen for the 49ers to be one of the best defenses in the league this year. If that's what you're betting on, you might as well be buying lottery tickets.
kalibane
Legacy
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:42 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby HumanCockroach » Tue Jul 07, 2015 6:16 pm

But it's also a reality that our O had a near historically bad performance last yr in many facets.


Something pointed out to you last off season by may, and was summarily dismissed, as was Seattle's rise also dismissed ( and to be absolutely honest the list is long from Tates ability, to Wilsons, from Sherman's oncoming dominance, to the viability of the read option, etc) at what point do you grow tired of looking the fool, and accept that many people know what the F they are talking about? How many times are you going to put your hand in the fire before you stop?
User avatar
HumanCockroach
Legacy
 
Posts: 5133
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: Woodinville, Wa

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby obiken » Tue Jul 07, 2015 7:01 pm

Just leave em where they are. Just leave Brittany Spears Seahawks alone!
obiken
Legacy
 
Posts: 3962
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:50 pm
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon 97070

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby c_hawkbob » Wed Jul 08, 2015 5:31 am

obiken wrote:Just leave em where they are. Just leave Brittany Spears Seahawks alone!


Uh, what?
User avatar
c_hawkbob
Legacy
 
Posts: 7440
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 3:34 pm
Location: Paducah Kentucky, 42001

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:16 am

kalibane wrote:Future why do you think people scooping up your scraps for depth means those scraps are actually good players? It means they are replacement level at best. The fact that the Cleveland Browns claimed Michael Bowie off waivers from the Seahawks is not proof that the Seahawks have back up OTs that are ready to step in and replace Russell Okung.

Demarcus Dobbs was scooped up because the Seahawks were desperate for DT help after losing Mebane, Jordan Hill and Jesse Williams not because he was so good that he couldn't be on the street. He barely has a minimum contract and will be at the bottom of the depth chart if he even makes the final roster. Ricky Jean Francios was widely considered one of the worst contracts of that free agent year and the Colts (not Titans) were ridiculed mercilously. He has since been released and was now signed by the Redskins. Dan Skuta is a depth player and isn't even projected to start for the Jaguars (although he might be forced due to injuries). When you have team success people inevitably overpay for your cast offs... look at the contract Byron Maxwell just got or the contract O'Brien Schofield got from the Giants after 2013.

There is a big difference from bringing these kind of guys in the game when you're in a pinch and having a talented coaching staff scheming around them to hide their weaknesses and relying on these guys to be your starters. You're now in a position where you are looking at latter and the next person that gets hurt you're playing street free agent level guys.

Your entire belief is based on every single thing working out... the corners develop to be better than last year's even though they couldn't beat out last year's corners and one of them (Ward) was kind of an embarrassment and got buried, Dorsey and Williams play at the level of Dorsey's career year rather than their typical level of play for their collective careers. Darnell Docket not only comes back 100% from ACL surgery at 34 but rejuvenates his game to mirror his production 2-3 years ago, adapts to a new role and is able to match what Justin Smith did for you. Lynch takes over for Brooks at OLB and plays at or above his level from 2011-2013 over 16 games. Navarro Bowman makes a complete recovery and is an all-pro LB again. Antoine Bethea shows no slippage in his play even though it's above the level he has typically played at and is aging. You somehow are able to mask the absence of Patrick Willis for 16 games with replacement level talent. None of your key players suffer injuries. And a vastly overhyped defensive coordinator who hasn't actually ever fielded a dominant defense does so for the first time in his career. I mean you can't even bank on the fact that Mangini was a holdover from last year because he was coaching TEs.

Those are the things that need to happen for the 49ers to be one of the best defenses in the league this year. If that's what you're betting on, you might as well be buying lottery tickets.


Are you aware that Ricky Jean Franciou recieved $30+ mil from the Colts, and Marcus Cooper started an entire seasoon for the Chiefs? Delaney Walker received a big payday from the Titans. These guys were not "scrubs pulled by other teams"; all of them were backups here and they all got paid like starters and did start. The only reason I brought Dobbs into the mix was to illustrate how biased your logic is. If the Hawks were as deep you've stated and conversely we were not, they'd not have pulled one of our backups in the 2nd biggest game in their franchise's history, period.

You claim guys had career yrs and need to do it again for us to have any shot at doing anything. No, what we have is a system and a defensive philosophy which maximizes player's talents. They only need to do their job for us to be successful. It's no different than Seattle, who has a group of "good" players who perform outstanding in a particular system which maximuzes their skillset. Bennett - average apart from Carrol. Thurmond? Less rhan average apart from Carroll. And you guys do not want to admit it, but Sherman would only be a decent corner on a team which asked him to do more. We only need our blue collar guys to do what they are good at for pur D to succeed.

Your lottery assessment is a joke. Look at ypur own O top to bottom, look at ours. As long as our D holds serve to where it can and should, we'll be right in the mix.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby burrrton » Wed Jul 08, 2015 9:49 am

And you guys do not want to admit it, but Sherman would only be a decent corner on a team which asked him to do more.


Yes. Because Eye Test™.

LOL. Futureite, if you didn't exist, we'd have to invent you for entertainment.

Never change.
User avatar
burrrton
Legacy
 
Posts: 4213
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:20 am

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:39 am

HC;

Yes, your assessments were right, mine were wrong last yr. Still, I have witnessed enough outstanding and terrible play in preseason which forshadowed nothing to put any stock in it whatsoever.

I do not get tired of looking like a fool. I embrace it. It's never good to fear other's opinions.

Enjoy your day!
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby kalibane » Wed Jul 08, 2015 11:21 am

Future,

Am I aware that they gave Ricky Jean a $30 million dollar contract? No because it was 22 million. Are you aware (and you should be since I just mentioned it) that the league collectively laughed at that contract and then he promptly went out and got benched and released two years into said contract?

THE NUMBER DOESN'T MATTER. What matters is that he played how pretty much everyone except the Colts thought he'd play... like a rotation back up who is passable for the sole purpose of giving your starters a blow without completely embarrassing himself.

You bringing up Dobbs doesn't prove any kind of bias because I have never once said Dobbs was good. Dobbs was a desperation signing based on injury and the fact that the trade deadline has passed and he actually was in game shape but not on an NFL Roster in the middle of November.

No, what we have is a system and a defensive philosophy which maximizes player's talents.

News flash... your system is GONE!!!!! Jim Harbaugh is in Michigan and Vic Fangio is in Chicago. They took their entire staff with them. Eric Mangini does not run the same system and the system he does run really hasn't been all that impressive once you actually start looking at his actual performance.

I'm not going to even address Sherman, that's just bait... you sound like a moron saying a guy who was just tabbed as #11 in the NFL 100 is only average. But I will say this since you think you are calling out bias...

If you think Michael Bennett has only been good under Carroll you obviously missed his last two years in Tampa.. particularly his last year in Tampa which was arguably the best season of his career. See that's the difference between you and I Future. I actually pay attention to the entire league and knew about Michael Bennett when he was in Tampa. I actually knew how people were snickering about Ricky Jean's contract, that he signed in Indy and not the Titans, that he got benched and released because he sucked.

You don't... You never heard of Bennett until he came to Seattle because Tampa was terrible you just assumed everyone on their team was bad instead of actually having some kind of factual basis upon which to base your opinion. Or you find a media narrative you like (e.g. Richard Sherman isn't asked to do much) and glom onto it. You look at the contract Ricky Jean got and the fact that he was miscast as a starter and think that validates his ability. It doesn't... All your backups are not good, in fact most of them are just that... backups... you don't have a plug and play system. And the depth that you did have has been ransacked.
kalibane
Legacy
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:42 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:14 pm

kalibane wrote:Future,

Am I aware that they gave Ricky Jean a $30 million dollar contract? No because it was 22 million. Are you aware (and you should be since I just mentioned it) that the league collectively laughed at that contract and then he promptly went out and got benched and released two years into said contract?

THE NUMBER DOESN'T MATTER. What matters is that he played how pretty much everyone except the Colts thought he'd play... like a rotation back up who is passable for the sole purpose of giving your starters a blow without completely embarrassing himself.

You bringing up Dobbs doesn't prove any kind of bias because I have never once said Dobbs was good. Dobbs was a desperation signing based on injury and the fact that the trade deadline has passed and he actually was in game shape but not on an NFL Roster in the middle of November.

No, what we have is a system and a defensive philosophy which maximizes player's talents.

News flash... your system is GONE!!!!! Jim Harbaugh is in Michigan and Vic Fangio is in Chicago. They took their entire staff with them. Eric Mangini does not run the same system and the system he does run really hasn't been all that impressive once you actually start looking at his actual performance.

I'm not going to even address Sherman, that's just bait... you sound like a moron saying a guy who was just tabbed as #11 in the NFL 100 is only average. But I will say this since you think you are calling out bias...

If you think Michael Bennett has only been good under Carroll you obviously missed his last two years in Tampa.. particularly his last year in Tampa which was arguably the best season of his career. See that's the difference between you and I Future. I actually pay attention to the entire league and knew about Michael Bennett when he was in Tampa. I actually knew how people were snickering about Ricky Jean's contract, that he signed in Indy and not the Titans, that he got benched and released because he sucked.

You don't... You never heard of Bennett until he came to Seattle because Tampa was terrible you just assumed everyone on their team was bad instead of actually having some kind of factual basis upon which to base your opinion. Or you find a media narrative you like (e.g. Richard Sherman isn't asked to do much) and glom onto it. You look at the contract Ricky Jean got and the fact that he was miscast as a starter and think that validates his ability. It doesn't... All your backups are not good, in fact most of them are just that... backups... you don't have a plug and play system. And the depth that you did have has been ransacked.


So, just to clarify:

Seahawks run a 4-3 D, lose Quinn, Bradley, promote from within. Of course that's fine, system is in tact.

49ers run a 3-4 D, lose Fangio, promote Mangini from within. We on the otherhand are totally effed because of it.

There you have it, Kalibane 101. Class in session. If the Seahawks do it, it works. If the 49ers do it, it does not work.

The "system" is a 3-4, and Baalke has consistently drafted or signed a specific type of player over and over agsin to fit it. Huge, 5 Tech DTackles, extraordinarily rangy, 6'5 inch huge wingspan athletic OLBs in Aaron and Aldon, physical SSs. It has not changed, and Mangini was OBVIOUSLY hired with a future promotion to DC in mind.

I still wonder if you believe half of what you post, or you're just effing with me. You cite Mangini's marginal results, but are you even aware of Vic's prior D rankings before coming here?? Some of his Ds were horrendous. Obviously you did not know that, or you'd not have made such an asenine assertion. Unless of course yoi are F'ing with me.

And what "league" was laughing? RJF got paid because the league determined that value. That's how a free market works my friend. The Colts would not have paid that if they could have paid less. Other backups of ours started on other teams because teams in the league determined they were good emough to start, period.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:12 pm

Kalibane;

And btw, Michael Bennett was NOT a star player at Tampa, and as I posted, your own team initially cut him. He put up good numbers in Tampa for one FN season and was paired with one of the better DTackles in the league in McCoy that yr. Yes, he was probably the most highly coveted FA the yr Seattle signed him OF THOSE AVAILABLE that yr FOR HIS POSITION, but nothing close to what he's been in his 2nd term in Seattle, where he's now worth top dollar IN YOUR SYSTEM. If he was the player you're embelishing him to be in Tampa, he'd not have signed for a pittance deal of 1 yr and less than $2 mil guaranteed in 2012 or whenever it was.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby kalibane » Thu Jul 09, 2015 6:12 am

:lol: :lol:

I could waste more energy tearing your argument to shreds about how Mangini was on your offensive staff and runs a different 3-4 than Fangio and not a single defensive coach from last year is remaining on your coaching staff, compared to the Seahawks who have lost a couple of coaches the last couple years but the vast majority of their staff remains intact running the same exact system. Not to mention, who's to say Kris Richard will be as good as Dan Quinn? I didn't hear anyone say that.

Or keep talking about how obvious it is that you talk out of your ass, considering your evaluation of Michael Bennet as "average" in a year where he logged 9 sacks and 3 forced fumbles while grading out as one of the best run stopping DEs in the league.

But I'm just going to leave you with this, which basically sums up you, your lack of consistency and laughably bad analysis:

You spent the last few days arguing that the 9ers defense was plug and play and had all these good players, and the proof of this was good players like Ricky Jean Francios getting a contract with the Tita... err Colts and starting games (even though he wound up getting released due to poor play). Now all of a sudden your proof that Michael Bennett wasn't good until Pete Carroll got ahold of him was that Tim Ruskell released him, a rookie undrafted free agent at the time, (even though Tampa Bay immediately picked him up and he went on to become a starter for them playing at a level far higher than Ricky Jean has ever played).

This more than anything summarizes the poster that is Futurite. At the same time putting on display that you absolutely do not actually watch the NFL and completely lack the ability to maintain a consistent argument. Your "logic" changes every time you need it to in order to hang onto the ideas that you wish were true.
kalibane
Legacy
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:42 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby NorthHawk » Thu Jul 09, 2015 10:04 am

Yah, the big difference with us is this is Pete's Defense and the DC runs it the way Pete wants it run, so we can replace DCs and not change the Defensive philosophy or strategies.
NorthHawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 11330
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:57 am

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Thu Jul 09, 2015 6:30 pm

kalibane wrote::lol: :lol:

I could waste more energy tearing your argument to shreds about how Mangini was on your offensive staff and runs a different 3-4 than Fangio and not a single defensive coach from last year is remaining on your coaching staff, compared to the Seahawks who have lost a couple of coaches the last couple years but the vast majority of their staff remains intact running the same exact system. Not to mention, who's to say Kris Richard will be as good as Dan Quinn? I didn't hear anyone say that.

Or keep talking about how obvious it is that you talk out of your ass, considering your evaluation of Michael Bennet as "average" in a year where he logged 9 sacks and 3 forced fumbles while grading out as one of the best run stopping DEs in the league.

But I'm just going to leave you with this, which basically sums up you, your lack of consistency and laughably bad analysis:

You spent the last few days arguing that the 9ers defense was plug and play and had all these good players, and the proof of this was good players like Ricky Jean Francios getting a contract with the Tita... err Colts and starting games (even though he wound up getting released due to poor play). Now all of a sudden your proof that Michael Bennett wasn't good until Pete Carroll got ahold of him was that Tim Ruskell released him, a rookie undrafted free agent at the time, (even though Tampa Bay immediately picked him up and he went on to become a starter for them playing at a level far higher than Ricky Jean has ever played).

This more than anything summarizes the poster that is Futurite. At the same time putting on display that you absolutely do not actually watch the NFL and completely lack the ability to maintain a consistent argument. Your "logic" changes every time you need it to in order to hang onto the ideas that you wish were true.


Eh, you don't have to get personal. Like I said, I reply to you because you do make good points and you are an intelligent guy.

That said, the main points I was making is that on D, both teams have maximized the talents of good players by putting them in position to pkay great. Bennet did have one good yr, but even the Seahawks were skeptical when they signed him. He's not a great player. He's great in your system. Same holds true with PLENTY of past Niners. Dashon Goldson is a prime example. Bottom line is thus far (including last yr), both teams have done a great job finding players with unique talents for their scheme.

Will Mangini's scheme be identical to Vic's? Of course not. What we do know is that he def knows D (I know you hate anecdotal evidence, but his D mind has been lauded by everyone, hense "Mangenius"), and Baalke has his Dick in everyone's ass and has been handpicking these scheme specific players since he started. He basically did Tomsula's intro presser for him, interupting to him to say "we're going to run the football". So I am about 100% positive he handpicked Mangini and grilled him as to how he'd use those same players in a base 3-4.

Bottom line, in my personal opinion, there are way too many really good, instinctual players on this D for it to fall apart. Reid, Bethea, Brock, Dorsey, Docket, Bowman, Ian Williams, Aldon Smith. These guys have won, they know how to play D in any system, and most importantly they are all very talented. And that is not even considering how Lynch, Tank, Ward, Harold etc may develop and contribute. A couple of them could be busts OR stars. We don't know.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Thu Jul 09, 2015 6:35 pm

NorthHawk wrote:Yah, the big difference with us is this is Pete's Defense and the DC runs it the way Pete wants it run, so we can replace DCs and not change the Defensive philosophy or strategies.


That's a valid point. He's a proven D mind, while we have a former Dline coach running the show.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby kalibane » Fri Jul 10, 2015 5:11 am

Your mistake Future is that you are treating this as a 49ers vs. Seahawks debate. It's not. If you want discuss the Seahawks we can discuss the Seahawks but this discussion is about the state of the 49ers it doesn't really matter how it compares to the Seahawks situation. You keep throwing the Seahawks into the discussion as if I'm engaging in some kind of double standard but I haven't even shared what my opinion of the Seahawks situation is so it's impossible to make that determination.

P.S. There is nothing personal about calling you out when you engage in a blatant contradiction in logic. I'd call out anyone who did the same thing. And you know this... you may not like my tone but you can't ever say it's personal. You have options. 1. Get thicker skin. 2. Don't engage with me. 3. Stop making really bad logical gaffes.
kalibane
Legacy
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:42 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby kalibane » Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:06 am

Mangini's defense was lauded and got the label of Mangenius based on his association with New England where he actually only had 1 year as DC... just like Romeo Crennel was lauded for his defense and Charlie Weis and Josh McDaniels were lauded for their offense.

The problem is once those coaches were outside of New England they were not anywhere near as good as their New England press. All of them failed miserably as head coaches and even when they went back to coordinators they were never top shelf guys. Even Josh McDaniels who is starting to get buzz again since he's been back in New England, really hasn't done anything without Tom Brady and Belichek. He failed miserably in Denver and was a disaster in St. Louis as O-Coordinator. Funny how having one of the top 5 QBs of all time makes you look like an offensive genius. In Mangini's case he fell so out of favor with the league he couldn't even find a coordinator position after Cleveland. How genius of a defensive mind does he have if he's been relegated to coaching TEs for the last two seasons? Plus even when you go and look at the year he coached in New England... his defense wasn't great by any stretch... good? sure... but not great. The idea that he's going to come in and replace Fangio and his staff who produced a truly elite defense, year in and year out is really optimistic. There is also the whole problem that pretty much none of his ex-players on NY and Cleveland liked or respected him. Even if all your guys came back I would have predicted a bit of a slip.

As for Bennett... you had no point for him. He has improved some IMO but his improvement from Tampa has been marginal. The only real difference is he got more recognition for his play because he was on a Super Bowl contender instead of basement dweller. He was a really good player in Tampa in his last year there and he was a good player the year before as well after he took the starting job mid season. The only reason he didn't get top dollar in free agency is because there were a glut of guys who were considered pure/edge pass rushers and Bennett was more of a hybrid. These were the other guys out there:

Paul Kruger
Michael Johnson
Osi Umenyiora
John Abraham
Cliff Avril
Dwight Freeney
Elvis Dumervil
Connor Barwin

Because Bennett was a hybrid no 3-4 was even going to consider him. And with all those other guys who at the time were either thought to be better pure pass rushers with a longer resume (Freeney/Umenyiora) or higher ceiling (Kruger/Johnson)... or just flat out better (Dumervil) Bennett wasn't on the top of anyone's list during the first tier of free agency. So when all that first tier money dried up Bennett decided to bet on himself and take a one year contract with a team where he had the best situation to showcase his talents.

Bennett was not a question mark for the Seahawks... he fell into our laps and it was immediately considered one of the best two or three signings of the offseason. The only reason he didn't get bigger money was the salary cap... the Seahawks gladly would have signed him to bigger money on a longer term deal but their money was already spent on Harvin and Avril and Bennett wasn't going to sign a long term deal at $5 million which was way under market.

As far as: "there are way too many really good, instinctual players on this D for it to fall apart. Reid, Bethea, Brock, Dorsey, Docket, Bowman, Ian Williams, Aldon Smith"

They have won... Dorsey and Williams are not "really good"... they have been okay to solid. I'm not sure I would rate Williams that much above replacement level. Bowman and Docket are rebounding major knee injuries that even when recovering successfully usually take 2 seasons to get back to 100% and again... Dockett is 34. I do like Reid and Bethea is solid. Brock has potential and shows good instincts but he's moving from the slot where he has safety help deep every play to outside full time so who's to say how that transition goes? Aldon Smith is Aldon Smith no questions there except for his 10 cent head.

The other guys you keep bringing up ... look I am not saying Lynch can't be good but you don't know, you're just guessing based on flash plays. Like I said it sounds an awful lot what we heard from you about Kendall Hunter and Dan Skuta ... who are not full time starting material, though I do give Lynch a better chance to be a good starter than either of those two. I really don't know why you keep bringing up Ward. That's a guy that based on last year I wouldn't even want on the field and if I were a QB I'd go after him as often as possible. He was a straight up liability.

But here you are acting like it's a given that they'll be a top 5 defense and acting like with all that my predicting them to fall to around #10-#12 is a clear sign Seahawk bias coming through. Ridiculous.
kalibane
Legacy
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:42 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:47 am

kalibane wrote:Mangini's defense was lauded and got the label of Mangenius based on his association with New England where he actually only had 1 year as DC... just like Romeo Crennel was lauded for his defense and Charlie Weis and Josh McDaniels were lauded for their offense.

The problem is once those coaches were outside of New England they were not anywhere near as good as their New England press. All of them failed miserably as head coaches and even when they went back to coordinators they were never top shelf guys. Even Josh McDaniels who is starting to get buzz again since he's been back in New England, really hasn't done anything without Tom Brady and Belichek. He failed miserably in Denver and was a disaster in St. Louis as O-Coordinator. Funny how having one of the top 5 QBs of all time makes you look like an offensive genius. In Mangini's case he fell so out of favor with the league he couldn't even find a coordinator position after Cleveland. How genius of a defensive mind does he have if he's been relegated to coaching TEs for the last two seasons? Plus even when you go and look at the year he coached in New England... his defense wasn't great by any stretch... good? sure... but not great. The idea that he's going to come in and replace Fangio and his staff who produced a truly elite defense, year in and year out is really optimistic. There is also the whole problem that pretty much none of his ex-players on NY and Cleveland liked or respected him. Even if all your guys came back I would have predicted a bit of a slip.

As for Bennett... you had no point for him. He has improved some IMO but his improvement from Tampa has been marginal. The only real difference is he got more recognition for his play because he was on a Super Bowl contender instead of basement dweller. He was a really good player in Tampa in his last year there and he was a good player the year before as well after he took the starting job mid season. The only reason he didn't get top dollar in free agency is because there were a glut of guys who were considered pure/edge pass rushers and Bennett was more of a hybrid. These were the other guys out there:

Paul Kruger
Michael Johnson
Osi Umenyiora
John Abraham
Cliff Avril
Dwight Freeney
Elvis Dumervil
Connor Barwin

Because Bennett was a hybrid no 3-4 was even going to consider him. And with all those other guys who at the time were either thought to be better pure pass rushers with a longer resume (Freeney/Umenyiora) or higher ceiling (Kruger/Johnson)... or just flat out better (Dumervil) Bennett wasn't on the top of anyone's list during the first tier of free agency. So when all that first tier money dried up Bennett decided to bet on himself and take a one year contract with a team where he had the best situation to showcase his talents.

Bennett was not a question mark for the Seahawks... he fell into our laps and it was immediately considered one of the best two or three signings of the offseason. The only reason he didn't get bigger money was the salary cap... the Seahawks gladly would have signed him to bigger money on a longer term deal but their money was already spent on Harvin and Avril and Bennett wasn't going to sign a long term deal at $5 million which was way under market.

As far as: "there are way too many really good, instinctual players on this D for it to fall apart. Reid, Bethea, Brock, Dorsey, Docket, Bowman, Ian Williams, Aldon Smith"

They have won... Dorsey and Williams are not "really good"... they have been okay to solid. I'm not sure I would rate Williams that much above replacement level. Bowman and Docket are rebounding major knee injuries that even when recovering successfully usually take 2 seasons to get back to 100% and again... Dockett is 34. I do like Reid and Bethea is solid. Brock has potential and shows good instincts but he's moving from the slot where he has safety help deep every play to outside full time so who's to say how that transition goes? Aldon Smith is Aldon Smith no questions there except for his 10 cent head.

The other guys you keep bringing up ... look I am not saying Lynch can't be good but you don't know, you're just guessing based on flash plays. Like I said it sounds an awful lot what we heard from you about Kendall Hunter and Dan Skuta ... who are not full time starting material, though I do give Lynch a better chance to be a good starter than either of those two. I really don't know why you keep bringing up Ward. That's a guy that based on last year I wouldn't even want on the field and if I were a QB I'd go after him as often as possible. He was a straight up liability.

But here you are acting like it's a given that they'll be a top 5 defense and acting like with all that my predicting them to fall to around #10-#12 is a clear sign Seahawk bias coming through. Ridiculous.


All very good points. I will say we can probably agree Mangini at least knows his Xs and Os very well. Whether it translates to success on the field or the talent is good as I believe remains to be seen. You could be 100% correct on all accounts.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby HumanCockroach » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:52 pm

The only reason he didn't get top dollar in free agency is because there were a glut of guys who were considered pure/edge pass rushers and Bennett was more of a hybrid.


Hell, Avril fell into our laps as well, I wonder if he is also an "average" player. Bennett and Avril were both considered booms, because well, they were, no matter how some try to twist it.
User avatar
HumanCockroach
Legacy
 
Posts: 5133
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: Woodinville, Wa

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Fri Jul 10, 2015 2:53 pm

Avril is solid, good, whatever adjective you want to use. He wasn't a dominant pass rusher in Detroit by any stretch, and that's where he makes his living. He and Venadenboch made a good pair. Prob equivalent to what Ray McDonald was for us. Very important for our particular system and held a higher value than he would have elsewhere for that reason.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby obiken » Fri Jul 10, 2015 4:02 pm

AFC titles won 0
NFC titles won 3
Any questions Just say no to this.
obiken
Legacy
 
Posts: 3962
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:50 pm
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon 97070

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby HumanCockroach » Fri Jul 10, 2015 5:33 pm

Futureite wrote:Avril is solid, good, whatever adjective you want to use. He wasn't a dominant pass rusher in Detroit by any stretch, and that's where he makes his living. He and Venadenboch made a good pair. Prob equivalent to what Ray McDonald was for us. Very important for our particular system and held a higher value than he would have elsewhere for that reason.


Avril in 2013 was considered the "best proven pass rusher in his prime on the market." And was coming off 11 sacks and 6 FF the year prior.
That year Seattle signed two of the top five rated pass rushers in their prime. Don't believe me, I'll give you the link .

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100000 ... ss-rushers
User avatar
HumanCockroach
Legacy
 
Posts: 5133
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: Woodinville, Wa

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby burrrton » Fri Jul 10, 2015 5:37 pm

HC, you're obviously neglecting to apply the Eye Test™. C'mon...
User avatar
burrrton
Legacy
 
Posts: 4213
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:20 am

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:30 pm

HC;

He's talented. A good player. Better in a certain scheme. 11 sacks is decent. He's had several yrs where he did not even break double digits. Hard to say he's anything more than a good player who is paired with a number of other good players in the perfect scheme for his skill set. Just like Whitner, Goldson, McDonald, prob quite a few Niners I could name.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby NorthHawk » Sat Jul 11, 2015 8:03 am

Players success is largely determined by the players around him and the coaches he has.
Some people say that Archie Manning was the best of the Manning QBs. I saw him play a little, but he had nobody around him to help so although people would say he's a great QB, he never really got the chance to play for a solid team.
There are a few players that can shine even with bad teams, but they are a rarity and usually end up in the HoF.

It remains to be seen whether the players on the 49ers will fit the scheme and philosophy of the SF Defense under Mangini or if he can push the right buttons.
History shows us that when there are changes to those ideals, some players either don't fully buy in or are asked to do things that don't maximize their talents.
It happens with draft choices as well when evaluation mistakes are made and it's why the games are played on turf, not paper.
NorthHawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 11330
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:57 am

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby Futureite » Sat Jul 11, 2015 8:15 am

NorthHawk wrote:Players success is largely determined by the players around him and the coaches he has.
Some people say that Archie Manning was the best of the Manning QBs. I saw him play a little, but he had nobody around him to help so although people would say he's a great QB, he never really got the chance to play for a solid team.
There are a few players that can shine even with bad teams, but they are a rarity and usually end up in the HoF.

It remains to be seen whether the players on the 49ers will fit the scheme and philosophy of the SF Defense under Mangini or if he can push the right buttons.
History shows us that when there are changes to those ideals, some players either don't fully buy in or are asked to do things that don't maximize their talents.
It happens with draft choices as well when evaluation mistakes are made and it's why the games are played on turf, not paper.


Great points man! I think that was all I was saying, that it's not the slam dunk certain flop everyone is expecting. I mean, Hawks are the obvious favorite and sure, we could win less games than last yr. We just have to see.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Possible Divisional Relalignment for Hawks?

Postby RiverDog » Sat Jul 11, 2015 8:45 am

NorthHawk wrote:Players success is largely determined by the players around him and the coaches he has.
Some people say that Archie Manning was the best of the Manning QBs. I saw him play a little, but he had nobody around him to help so although people would say he's a great QB, he never really got the chance to play for a solid team.
There are a few players that can shine even with bad teams, but they are a rarity and usually end up in the HoF.

It remains to be seen whether the players on the 49ers will fit the scheme and philosophy of the SF Defense under Mangini or if he can push the right buttons.
History shows us that when there are changes to those ideals, some players either don't fully buy in or are asked to do things that don't maximize their talents.
It happens with draft choices as well when evaluation mistakes are made and it's why the games are played on turf, not paper.


To a lesser degree, David Carr fits into that category, too. Poor guy never had a chance.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Previous

Return to Seahawks Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests