politicalfootball wrote:c_hawkbob maybe its just me but I have never seen the it factor from TJ. He is a place holder who can win a game or two but it would come from the whole team not just the QB position. I want us never to see TJ in a game so the point is moot. Definitly need more good prime grade A beef along the Oline maybe in FA.
politicalfootball wrote:I heard RW wants to be the highest paid QB. Is this true or just BS.
Hawktawk wrote:RW has also said more recently that although he wants to be in Seattle and hopes to be in Seattle he has "had to move around before". He cited the move from NC to Wisconsin as an example. On the flip side he has said he will not hold out and has been a leader in offseason workouts so that dispenses with all the "selfish and greedy" talk. I think he would play his guts out for 1.5 million this year, he really would. But if he does Seattle will never sign him to a long term deal. He will find a way out.
RiverDog wrote:You don't have to hold out in order to be selfish and greedy.
c_hawkbob wrote:
You need to separate selfish and greedy.
If someone is asking above their value it may indicate being greedy (though at this point it's still just negotiations, everybody starts farther away from their actual target than they expect to settle for, on both sides of any such negotiation) or it may indicate an agent that has misjudged the market. In this case it's to early to make that determination.
But selfish? Holing out, to the detriment of the team or other players on the team, is the only thing you can really point to as being selfish. Even then there are to many other thing to consider to say selfishness was at the root of it.
Many people here called Walt selfish and greedey during his many hold outs, but in retrospect does that seem to be accurate now?
And Russ is nowhere near holding out and has said he won't. Call him greedy if you must this early in the game, but not selfish.
c_hawkbob wrote:You need to separate selfish and greedy.
If someone is asking above their value it may indicate being greedy (though at this point it's still just negotiations, everybody starts farther away from their actual target than they expect to settle for, on both sides of any such negotiation) or it may indicate an agent that has misjudged the market. In this case it's to early to make that determination.
But selfish? Holing out, to the detriment of the team or other players on the team, is the only thing you can really point to as being selfish. Even then there are to many other thing to consider to say selfishness was at the root of it.
Many people here called Walt selfish and greedey during his many hold outs, but in retrospect does that seem to be accurate now?
And Russ is nowhere near holding out and has said he won't. Call him greedy if you must this early in the game, but not selfish.
c_hawkbob wrote:And I'm disagreeing, I think it's out of line to call anyone selfish for anything short of holing out, and even then it may not be fair.
c_hawkbob wrote:Point taken.
Selfishness on the field is a bit of a different thing, but still ... walking off the field, or refusing to take the field because things aren't going the way you want them to is indeed selfish.
c_hawkbob wrote:See I don't think Russ owes us a thing. I think his play and his leadership have repaid any debt he may have owed us many times over. We as a team have benefited every bit as much from his play elite level play at dime store prices as he has benefited from our giving him his early shot.
His greatness would have made itself evident sooner or later no matter who took him and he'd still be in line for a big contract either now or next year. Meanwhile, would we have had this same level of success without him?
I'm not saying we owe him more than he owes us, I'm saying the situation has been mutually beneficial and we move forward as a great team negotiating with it's most important player.
c_hawkbob wrote:See I don't think Russ owes us a thing. I think his play and his leadership have repaid any debt he may have owed us many times over. We as a team have benefited every bit as much from his play elite level play at dime store prices as he has benefited from our giving him his early shot.
His greatness would have made itself evident sooner or later no matter who took him and he'd still be in line for a big contract either now or next year. Meanwhile, would we have had this same level of success without him?
I'm not saying we owe him more than he owes us, I'm saying the situation has been mutually beneficial and we move forward as a great team negotiating with it's most important player.
-- Pete Carroll st the Humanitarian of the year awards Tuesday"We love Russell and we want him back playing for us forever. There’s a lot of work being done. It’s underway right now and maybe it happens, I don’t know. We’re hoping for it."
"It'll all work out. I love Seattle, it's a great city," said Wilson, who's also hosting tonight's Kids' Choice Sports Awards. "I'm going to play my butt off every day. That's all I know, and we'll see what happens."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests