savvyman wrote:Russell Wilson is Being Greedy & Selfish.
HumanCockroach wrote:Even IF that were the case, I always side with the player, and always will. It's the way America is run, get what you can, while you can. Owners certainly are not paying guys they deem to expensive, two signatures on those contracts not just one, yet fans often turn on the players for their "greed", while accepting it's a "business" for the billionaires, well, it is for the players as well, and as with ANY business, you attempt to maximize your potential profit, the SAME as the billionaires .
(Edit - According to Clayton this Morning Seahawks have offered Russell More money than Aaron Rodgers and this is still not good enough
savvyman wrote:Russell Wilson is Being Greedy & Selfish.
NorthHawk wrote:I don't know if savvy really means it or is just impatient and frustrated. I hope the latter.
There seems to be some people out there who don't take the players viewpoint at all.
They expect them to take the first offer given for the betterment of the team, but if that player gets a career ending injury their the first to shout "Next man up!" and forget about them by the next game. Comments like it's part of the game or injuries happen roll off their tongues like they are talking about what to order at a drive thru.
I don't have a problem with any of the players trying to get as much money as they can because it's a short term dangerous game and they have but a single shot to grasp the brass ring no matter how long their career is.
NorthHawk wrote:I don't know if savvy really means it or is just impatient and frustrated. I hope the latter.
There seems to be some people out there who don't take the players viewpoint at all.
They expect them to take the first offer given for the betterment of the team, but if that player gets a career ending injury their the first to shout "Next man up!" and forget about them by the next game. Comments like it's part of the game or injuries happen roll off their tongues like they are talking about what to order at a drive thru.
I don't have a problem with any of the players trying to get as much money as they can because it's a short term dangerous game and they have but a single shot to grasp the brass ring no matter how long their career is.
They expect them to take the first offer given for the betterment of the team
Comments like it's part of the game or injuries happen roll off their tongues like they are talking about what to order at a drive thru.
savvyman wrote:There are numerous reports including Russell's agent who says that he is trying to make Russell the Highest paid QB in the NFL.
For those who are coming in late - this means Russell is trying to be the Highest Paid Player in the NFL.
Paying Russell this much money will have a serious impact on the Financial Structure of the Seahawk's salary cap for them to be able to pay for enough supporting talent at other positions that are necessary for a championship team.
Sherman took less then what he could have ultimately pushed for - same with Thomas, Bennett, Kam, Averil etc. Russell always talks about the team this or that. Yet he (through his agent) is demanding a contract so high that it puts the organization ability to field and pay for a championship quality team in Jeopardy.
Seahawk's by all accounts are willing to pay him top 5 and maybe even top 3 QB money. He will be making near $100 million no matter what over the next 5 years. If the Seahawks continue their winning ways (which will much more difficult with the most expensive contract in the NFL to pay) Russell will make double figure millions more in endorsements during that time.
(Edit - According to Clayton this Morning Seahawks have offered Russell More money than Aaron Rodgers and this is still not good enough) http://sea.247sports.com/Bolt/Clayton-Sense-of-urgency-for-Seahawks-to-get-Wilson-deal-done-37952412
Again - this is the NFL which has a unique "Salary Pie" where each team get the same total amount of Salary to divide up among their 53 man roster - the larger the salary slice of the pie that one player takes - the less that is available for the other 52 players.
As I said - Russell is being selfish and greedy. You can spin it in your own mind any other way you see fit.
NorthHawk wrote:You sound a little sensitive about my comments, Burrrton.
I hear and read those comments all the time across all professional sports by people who forget these guys are people,
Sure, they make a lot of money in a short period of time, but like any businessman, they seek to capitalize on their talents. It's no different from any contracted employee or business person with the exception that it could all end the first time they step on the field and their career doesn't last 30 years or more.
Nobody's looking at NFL players like they are class victims. Rather they have to get as much as they can whenever possible.
By the way, we're talking within the context of Wilsons contract, not breaking existing deals. That's why the comment about taking less for the betterment of the team.
'
Edit.
People have died earlier than they otherwise would as a direct result of injury.
Darryl Stingley is one example to show you that it is a dangerous profession.
By the way, we're talking within the context of Wilsons contract, not breaking existing deals.
People have died earlier than they otherwise would as a direct result of injury.
It's no different from any contracted employee or business person with the exception that it could all end the first time they step on the field and their career doesn't last 30 years or more.
Hawktawk wrote:Wilson is shrewd, not greedy. Asking for what you are worth is intelligent, self confident, everything we already know he is.Allowing yourself to be underpaid is stupid and submissive, everything we know he is not. Whatever deal he signs will be dwarfed when Luck and Rodgers re-up, not to mention they, as well as Newton and Tannehill already were on first round deals. RW and his agent understand this and aren't going to lowball themselves. And as has been mentioned many times Wilson has played the most prolific first 3 seasons in NFL history for a total of what Hauschka will make this year alone. If Seattle signs Wilson to a 5 year 20 million dollar a year deal they really got him for 8 years for 103 million, an average of 12 million over his first 8 seasons. Wilson want some payback in the new deal for his production the first 3 years playing for a pittance. I agree. The proof is in the pudding, the hardware is in the case already. This isn't like drafting some first rounder and handing the moon to him. This is the most Danger Russ player in the NFL.
Mark my words, the Hawks would rue the day they slap a non exclusive F tag on Wilson because the teams would be lining up with their 2 first rounders' and a boatload of cash to bring this dynamic superstar to their franchise. He's worth it.
burrrton wrote:By the way, we're talking within the context of Wilsons contract, not breaking existing deals.
I know, but the only situation in which players take the kind of criticism you're talking about is when they want teams to tear up their contracts.
People have died earlier than they otherwise would as a direct result of injury.
Oh for pete's sake, North- just stop.
Nobody has to play NFL football. It's a high-risk-high-reward job that most people would give their left nut to have.
It's no different from any contracted employee or business person with the exception that it could all end the first time they step on the field and their career doesn't last 30 years or more.
It could end the first time they step on the field... then you know what happens, North? They move on from making more in a season than the average worker sees in a lifetime and get regular jobs, just like you and I and everyone else had to do, but without a few million bucks in the bank.
Stop weeping for them- they're as blessed a group of people as the world has ever seen outside of maybe the royal family.
Not everyone is a selfish prick like you, burrrton.
Of course nobody forces players to play the game, but it also doesn't mean we shouldn't have some compassion and understanding when they want to be compensated for that risk.
Hawktawk wrote:I employ people. Its BS to say you don't pay them as a reward for what they have already done for you. If you don't they go work for someone else.
And let me tell you something else. Wilson would be starting and starring for whoever he was drafted by. PC and JS (along with long suffering fans) are by far the greatest beneficiaries of this draft pick. I don't want to hear about what a big favor they did Wilson. He has taken the bull by the horns in an unprecedented way.
NorthHawk wrote:Not everyone is a selfish prick like you, burrrton.
Some of us care about our fellow man and have some feelings when people get seriously injured when providing simple entertainment for our enjoyment.
Just because you don't care if someone has a life changing injury so you can walk around with your chest puffed out claiming "WE" performed at a certain level doesn't mean we all do.
Of course nobody forces players to play the game, but it also doesn't mean we shouldn't have some compassion and understanding when they want to be compensated for that risk.
Hawktawk wrote:To be fair, past performances do enter into the equation in contracting as it is a predictor of future performance, but it's not to be confused with rewarding an individual or company for past work.
Again RD, as you say its apples and oranges. But that's comparing RWs situation to almost any other player in the league too. Nobody has done so much so fast while making so little money doing it as Wilson. The only guy even in the ballpark is Brady. And also the dynamic way in which RW makes plays is very unique. I think he deserves to be paid keeping in mind what he has already done for this franchise, regardless of what the NFL thought process is. He's earned it. IMO JS screwed around and the Newton and especially Tannehill deals happened and Wilson is saying no way I'm taking their money, I'm better than them. And he is.
Waiting has cost the Hawks money. Waiting longer will cost them lots more money. Waiting too long will cost them the best QB in franchise history.
The price isn't going down for Mr. Wilson.
Hawktawk wrote:I forgot about Warner. He was another one of those guys for sure, although he shuffled around a couple rosters before getting the job in ST Lois due to injuries. Brady got his shot due to injury as well. Russ has been the guy from day 1 and has never missed a snap.As for Sherm he got paid very well, top CB type of money. And no way any corner in the league is as important as the starting QB of our team. Name me a player or players on our team you would keep instead of Wilson if you had to choose. My answer is ZERO. Whats yours?
RiverDog wrote:
Of course, there's no other player on our team that I'd rather keep than Russell. But that doesn't mean that I'm willing to blow up the team in order to keep him.
Waiting has cost the Hawks money. Waiting longer will cost them lots more money. Waiting too long will cost them the best QB in franchise history. The price isn't going down for Mr. Wilson
.Anthony wrote:"Of course, there's no other player on our team that I'd rather keep than Russell. But that doesn't mean that I'm willing to blow up the team in order to keep him."
It depends on your definition of blowing up the roster. It if means in stead of being 3 deep beyond starters at every positions and being 2 deep I am fine with that. If it means relying on the draft and cheap FAs for depth again I am fine with that. Given all the main people, Et, Kam, Sherm, Lynch, Graham, are all signed for several years who would we really be giving up?
RiverDog wrote:
I edited out the blowing up the roster portion and replaced it with remaining competitive.
The players already signed aren't the issue. The issue is future signings. Giving Russell a huge, long term deal might not hinder us this season, but in the seasons to come, it could loom large. Say players like Sweezy and Marsh really blossom, and with no viable replacements available, we really want to keep them. If Russell's contract eats up a disproportionate amount of the pie, it could have an unwanted effect on our roster.
SalmonBB wrote:My prediction: RW goes to the Chargers in 2016. A lot of little indicators that seem to add up for me (e.g., practicing in San Diego, childhood memories of San Diego, QB situation in San Diego, likelihood of Chargers going to big market and celebrity-studded LA, etc.). If he is made the highest paid QB, then I see him in Seattle. Anything outside of that, I see him in SoCal. Of course, I hope I'm wrong. Going to make the most of watching him play for the Seahawks this next year.
GO SEAHAWKS!!!
Anthony wrote:Dude at that point there blossoming will make others replaceable and it will even out. Also that is an If, we cannot run a team on "ifs". Also the cap goes up a lot every year and of course there are always cheap backups available.
RiverDog wrote:
Cheap backups? To replace Pro Bowlers (assuming players like Marsh, Sweeney, et al blossom)?
Teams run on 'if''s' all the time. They speculate more than the most aggressive Wall Street trader.
Anthony wrote:OKay lets play the assuming and what iof game or replacing guys who under performed like Marsh, Sweeney, okung etc. you are really stretching with this one, but if we want to play IFs I would put my IFs into Wilson who ahs proven it than 2 guys who have proven nothing. What if the guys behind them are better and cheaper, what if they draft people in the next 2 years wh90o are better and cheaper etc. okay want to keep playing If. We can but it is really a waste of time. The reality is the starters will not be the issue the 3rd teamers are were we will se the biggest issue.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests