savvyman wrote:RiverDog wrote:So is Carpenter now officially a bust?[/quote
As much as I hate to think so - the answer appears to be yes.
JS - Yes Carpenter and Moffit are both "Cable Guys" - -
Zorn76 wrote:I agree that Carpenter ain't cuttin' it, and doesn't fit long terms plans for the future.
Relieved we won.
But Clearly, we need some new draft picks for OL. It's easily the biggest problem on passing downs (though WR drops don't help), because over half the time RW is runnin' for his life.
Better step it up next week, 'cause that game is gonna be tougher than this one was.
Seahawks4Ever wrote:That's what I would call JC, a BUST.
I do believe HawkShack is deleting some of my posts. I made a comment on this thread essentially saying what RD said and now it is gone.
That is B.S. of you Mr. moderator and very heavy handed, I did NOT say anything wrong.
Eaglehawk wrote:Seahawks4Ever wrote:That's what I would call JC, a BUST.
I do believe HawkShack is deleting some of my posts. I made a comment on this thread essentially saying what RD said and now it is gone.
That is B.S. of you Mr. moderator and very heavy handed, I did NOT say anything wrong.
Why would moderator pick on you? Sure it isn't software related? I have experienced some glitches myself. Just sayin.
savvyman wrote:I just heard Schneider on the radio - James Carpenter will not be suiting up for the game. When asked why Carpenter would not be suting up for todays game Schneider did not address Carpenter directly just kept on saying how well Bowie and McQusitan have been playing.
Carpenter is not injured. It looks like he has been moved down the depth chart.
Eaglehawk wrote:savvyman wrote:I just heard Schneider on the radio - James Carpenter will not be suiting up for the game. When asked why Carpenter would not be suting up for todays game Schneider did not address Carpenter directly just kept on saying how well Bowie and McQusitan have been playing.
Carpenter is not injured. It looks like he has been moved down the depth chart.
That info was huge. And happy for Bowie. I saw the improved play immediately. Bowie was moving some bodies today.
On the second td, Kearse contained the edge very very well.
NorthHawk wrote:Eaglehawk wrote:savvyman wrote:I just heard Schneider on the radio - James Carpenter will not be suiting up for the game. When asked why Carpenter would not be suting up for todays game Schneider did not address Carpenter directly just kept on saying how well Bowie and McQusitan have been playing.
Carpenter is not injured. It looks like he has been moved down the depth chart.
That info was huge. And happy for Bowie. I saw the improved play immediately. Bowie was moving some bodies today.
On the second td, Kearse contained the edge very very well.
It speaks to the commitment this team has to the philosophy that the best player starts regardless of draft position or contract.
Eaglehawk wrote:savvyman wrote:I just heard Schneider on the radio - James Carpenter will not be suiting up for the game. When asked why Carpenter would not be suting up for todays game Schneider did not address Carpenter directly just kept on saying how well Bowie and McQusitan have been playing.
Carpenter is not injured. It looks like he has been moved down the depth chart.
That info was huge. And happy for Bowie. I saw the improved play immediately. Bowie was moving some bodies today.
On the second td, Kearse contained the edge very very well.
savvyman wrote:Eaglehawk wrote:savvyman wrote:I just heard Schneider on the radio - James Carpenter will not be suiting up for the game. When asked why Carpenter would not be suting up for todays game Schneider did not address Carpenter directly just kept on saying how well Bowie and McQusitan have been playing.
Carpenter is not injured. It looks like he has been moved down the depth chart.
That info was huge. And happy for Bowie. I saw the improved play immediately. Bowie was moving some bodies today.
On the second td, Kearse contained the edge very very well.
I agree - from what I saw Bowie played well - I recorded the game and will watch later - interesting to see how Bowie did in pass protection.
From what I have seen I agree.
Pete comments on Bowie and his decision to play him at around the 5:30 mark of his post game press conference.
http://www.seahawks.com/videos-photos/videos/Pete-Carroll-Divisional-Press-Conference-vs-Saints/8b0889b6-4379-4e6b-bd4d-827234254326
Zorn76 wrote:Not much of a risk by Pete, IMO, even under these (playoff) circumstances.
Carpenter stinks, so it'd be difficult for Bowie to do any worse in the first place.
Eaglehawk wrote:Zorn76 wrote:Not much of a risk by Pete, IMO, even under these (playoff) circumstances.
Carpenter stinks, so it'd be difficult for Bowie to do any worse in the first place.
First rounder at that. Rare to see a player play himself off a starting spot after being the starter all season. What in god's Earth would cause someone to play as bad as he did is beyond me. You'd think he would be dying to be part of this front line. He's now inactive. Are you kidding me?
A long long drop down Snoquamie Falls. Carpenter is rock bottom.
savvyman wrote:
Today's decision to bench Carpenter more than likely reflects the coaching staff opinion of his attitude and efforts that Carp has expended throughout this year.
People would not remember but I issued a mid-season report card on the Seahawks on the PI thread. I gave Carpenter an F (he was the only player to grade so low) and I commented at that time that his performance was so disappointing that he needed to look into the mirror and really do some soul searching.
[/b]
What is most disappointing about Carp is he has all the physical tools to be our most dominating lineman. Apparently though he does not have the will, drive or love of the game to match his physical tools.
Eaglehawk wrote:savvyman wrote:
Today's decision to bench Carpenter more than likely reflects the coaching staff opinion of his attitude and efforts that Carp has expended throughout this year.
People would not remember but I issued a mid-season report card on the Seahawks on the PI thread. I gave Carpenter an F (he was the only player to grade so low) and I commented at that time that his performance was so disappointing that he needed to look into the mirror and really do some soul searching.
[/b]
What is most disappointing about Carp is he has all the physical tools to be our most dominating lineman. Apparently though he does not have the will, drive or love of the game to match his physical tools.
If you gave Carpenter an F at mid-season you have my respect Savvy! I was bamboozled. Sure he played like crap, but I gave him way more deference due to him being a first rounder than I should have. It's amazing how much you give guys respect just because they are a "first rounders". Now I understand the chip on Sherman's, Wilson's, and the rest of our no name receiving corp's shoulders.
Eaglehawk wrote:Seahawks4Ever wrote:That's what I would call JC, a BUST.
I do believe HawkShack is deleting some of my posts. I made a comment on this thread essentially saying what RD said and now it is gone.
That is B.S. of you Mr. moderator and very heavy handed, I did NOT say anything wrong.
Why would moderator pick on you? Sure it isn't software related? I have experienced some glitches myself. Just sayin.
RiverDog wrote:I didn't like the Carpenter pick when we made it, but what really turned me against him was the way he came into his first training camp. He was so far out of shape that he couldn't go two plays without breathing like a vacuum cleaner. Horrible work ethic. There were a lot of posters that made excuses for him, saying that the lockout hurt him as players couldn't go into team facilities, but there was nothing from stopping him from going into a Gold's Gym and hitting a Stairmaster. Supposedly his coach at Alabama, Nick Saban, was very surprised that we took Carpenter as high as we did.
And if Harvin doesn't produce, it would make 3 wasted #1's in a row, plus our first pick last year, Cristine Michael, hasn't played hardly at all. That doesn't bode well for the long term health of our franchise to be striking out with our top picks. You have to make those top picks count. It was his failure to do so that led to Tim Ruskell's demise.
And I hate to say it, but our following #1 pick, Bruce Irvin, doesn't appear to be getting any better, either, and seems to have hit a plateau. I took a lot of heat for that one, too.
I didn't like the Carpenter pick when we made it
NorthHawk wrote:I've said a number of times that our FO doesn't get Offense the same way it does Defense.
Regarding Carpenter, how do you know it's an attitude or effort issue? Do you have contacts within the organization?
From my position on the couch it looks like a lack of ability. He's big and strong enough, but still can't dominate early in games which leads me to believe its a lack of talent or ability to learn the proper techniques rather than effort.
RiverDog wrote:NorthHawk wrote:I've said a number of times that our FO doesn't get Offense the same way it does Defense.
Regarding Carpenter, how do you know it's an attitude or effort issue? Do you have contacts within the organization?
From my position on the couch it looks like a lack of ability. He's big and strong enough, but still can't dominate early in games which leads me to believe its a lack of talent or ability to learn the proper techniques rather than effort.
Of course I don't "know". I'm going off my own impression, that and the lack of an enthusiastic endorsement from his college coach. As I stated, I don't accept some of the excuses made up for his coming into his first pro football camp in the type of shape that he did. His lack of conditioning could have been a factor in his inability to stay healthy, too. From the day he was selected, he should have been working out 8 hours a day, and it was apparent to me that he had not.
I could never see what our brain trust saw in him that would make them think that he could be a successful NFL offensive tackle. I thought that he was going to be a decent offensive guard, and indeed, he is pretty fair at the point of attack. But he's not quick enough to take on a linebacker, make effective trap blocks, or get into the second level and cut off pursuit.
savvyman wrote:I had wanted us to take Dave DeCastro in the draft with our 15th pick - But I understand the coaches reasoning for taking Irvin - we needed pass rush help in the worst way - especially as Pete knew that in order to win a championship you have to be able to neutralize the great QB's of this league. And the only way to do that is with a defensive line that can generate pressure.
Next year will be Irvin's Show me year - He will have the off season to continue to relearn his new position - we know he has the athletic tools - now can he get the mental understanding of the position and how to execute the proper decision making at the speed of the game?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests